A critical review on the development stages of biorefinery systems for sugarcane processing wastes

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Dongdong Wang , Surendra Sarsaiya , Jiatong Zheng , Jonathan W.C. Wong , Jun Zhou , Jisen Zhang
{"title":"A critical review on the development stages of biorefinery systems for sugarcane processing wastes","authors":"Dongdong Wang ,&nbsp;Surendra Sarsaiya ,&nbsp;Jiatong Zheng ,&nbsp;Jonathan W.C. Wong ,&nbsp;Jun Zhou ,&nbsp;Jisen Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sugarcane processing is a globally significant industrial endeavour that generates an astoundingly large quantity of lignocellulosic waste. Annually, approximately 1.8 billion tons of bagasse alone is produced, representing a substantial by-product of the sugarcane industry. However, current disposal practices, such as landfilling without proper methane capture systems or incineration using outdated technologies, exacerbate the environmental burden. Landfills release methane, a greenhouse gas with over 25 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide over a 100 - year period, whereas sub-standard incineration emits harmful pollutants such as particulate matter and sulfur dioxide. An in-depth review is presented, examining diverse biorefinery pathways for the conversion of these wastes. Bagasse conversion into bioenergy, such as ethanol via enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of cellulose and hemicellulose, and biogas via anaerobic digestion, is a promising approach. Biochemical production from sugarcane waste feedstocks, such as citric acid via microbial fermentation and polylactic acid (PLA), presents considerable potential. Benchmarking apple pomace valorization reveals sugarcane waste's unique utilization potential. Three systemic barriers persist: poor integration (resource inefficiency), economic fragility (feedstock price volatility and high costs), and inadequate life-cycle assessments. AI-driven modular platforms for optimization, dynamic techno-economic models, and region-specific sustainability metrics. These findings position sugarcane waste as a cornerstone of the circular bioeconomy, particularly in sugarcane-growing nations of the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116316"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212500989X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sugarcane processing is a globally significant industrial endeavour that generates an astoundingly large quantity of lignocellulosic waste. Annually, approximately 1.8 billion tons of bagasse alone is produced, representing a substantial by-product of the sugarcane industry. However, current disposal practices, such as landfilling without proper methane capture systems or incineration using outdated technologies, exacerbate the environmental burden. Landfills release methane, a greenhouse gas with over 25 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide over a 100 - year period, whereas sub-standard incineration emits harmful pollutants such as particulate matter and sulfur dioxide. An in-depth review is presented, examining diverse biorefinery pathways for the conversion of these wastes. Bagasse conversion into bioenergy, such as ethanol via enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of cellulose and hemicellulose, and biogas via anaerobic digestion, is a promising approach. Biochemical production from sugarcane waste feedstocks, such as citric acid via microbial fermentation and polylactic acid (PLA), presents considerable potential. Benchmarking apple pomace valorization reveals sugarcane waste's unique utilization potential. Three systemic barriers persist: poor integration (resource inefficiency), economic fragility (feedstock price volatility and high costs), and inadequate life-cycle assessments. AI-driven modular platforms for optimization, dynamic techno-economic models, and region-specific sustainability metrics. These findings position sugarcane waste as a cornerstone of the circular bioeconomy, particularly in sugarcane-growing nations of the Global South.
甘蔗加工废弃物生物精炼系统的发展阶段综述
甘蔗加工是一项全球重要的工业活动,它产生了数量惊人的木质纤维素废物。每年,仅甘蔗渣就生产了大约18亿吨,这是甘蔗工业的重要副产品。然而,目前的处理做法,如没有适当的甲烷捕获系统的填埋或使用过时技术的焚烧,加剧了环境负担。垃圾填埋场释放的甲烷是一种温室气体,在100年的时间里,甲烷的温室效应是二氧化碳的25倍以上,而不符合标准的焚烧会排放有害污染物,如颗粒物和二氧化硫。提出了深入的审查,审查了这些废物转化的各种生物炼制途径。甘蔗渣转化为生物能源,如通过纤维素和半纤维素的酶解和发酵转化为乙醇,以及通过厌氧消化转化为沼气,是一种很有前途的方法。利用甘蔗废原料进行生化生产,如微生物发酵柠檬酸和聚乳酸(PLA),具有相当大的潜力。以苹果渣为标杆,揭示了甘蔗废弃物独特的利用潜力。三个系统性障碍仍然存在:整合不良(资源效率低下)、经济脆弱性(原料价格波动和成本高)和生命周期评估不足。人工智能驱动的模块化平台,用于优化、动态技术经济模型和特定区域的可持续性指标。这些发现将甘蔗废料定位为循环生物经济的基石,特别是在全球南方的甘蔗种植国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信