Microbial synergies in co-digestion of food waste and wastewater sludge: pathways to energy recovery and emission reduction

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Anwar Ahmad , Hamad Almohamadi , Abdullah S. Alnasser , Qazi Nasser , Mohammed Al-Sibani , Amal S. Al-Rahbi , Mohammad S. Mubarak
{"title":"Microbial synergies in co-digestion of food waste and wastewater sludge: pathways to energy recovery and emission reduction","authors":"Anwar Ahmad ,&nbsp;Hamad Almohamadi ,&nbsp;Abdullah S. Alnasser ,&nbsp;Qazi Nasser ,&nbsp;Mohammed Al-Sibani ,&nbsp;Amal S. Al-Rahbi ,&nbsp;Mohammad S. Mubarak","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food waste (FW) and wastewater sludge (WS) from treatment plants require sustainable treatment techniques such as anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD), to generate renewable energy and support climate change mitigation. AcoD offers a benefit; it reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane, and simultaneously produces renewable biogas, which can be converted into electricity and heat, generating revenue and supporting economic growth. The implementation of AcoD is most advanced in regions with supportive waste management and energy recovery incentives, where co-digestion of FW with WS has become a viable pathway for both environmental and economic gains. AcoD operational energy demands exist, the electricity generated from methane combustion significantly offsets these costs, improving the energy balance by approximately ∼93–196 %, and contributing to GHG emission reductions of up to 97 %. This review highlights the economic feasibility and environmental benefits of the AcoD system, emphasizing their role in electricity revenue generation and broader GHG offsetting. Moreover, the findings underscore the importance of a policy framework that supports AcoD deployment through incentives and regulatory mechanisms. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is crucial for quantifying the net environmental impact and informing decisions on AcoD adoption. By advancing AcoD technologies and integration into national climate and waste strategies, policymakers can promote circular economic practices while significantly reducing the global warming potential (GWP) of organic waste treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116333"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food waste (FW) and wastewater sludge (WS) from treatment plants require sustainable treatment techniques such as anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD), to generate renewable energy and support climate change mitigation. AcoD offers a benefit; it reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane, and simultaneously produces renewable biogas, which can be converted into electricity and heat, generating revenue and supporting economic growth. The implementation of AcoD is most advanced in regions with supportive waste management and energy recovery incentives, where co-digestion of FW with WS has become a viable pathway for both environmental and economic gains. AcoD operational energy demands exist, the electricity generated from methane combustion significantly offsets these costs, improving the energy balance by approximately ∼93–196 %, and contributing to GHG emission reductions of up to 97 %. This review highlights the economic feasibility and environmental benefits of the AcoD system, emphasizing their role in electricity revenue generation and broader GHG offsetting. Moreover, the findings underscore the importance of a policy framework that supports AcoD deployment through incentives and regulatory mechanisms. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is crucial for quantifying the net environmental impact and informing decisions on AcoD adoption. By advancing AcoD technologies and integration into national climate and waste strategies, policymakers can promote circular economic practices while significantly reducing the global warming potential (GWP) of organic waste treatments.

Abstract Image

食物垃圾和废水污泥共消化中的微生物协同作用:能源回收和减排途径
来自处理厂的食物垃圾(FW)和废水污泥(WS)需要可持续的处理技术,如厌氧共消化(AcoD),以产生可再生能源并支持减缓气候变化。AcoD提供了一个好处;它减少了温室气体(GHG)的排放,特别是甲烷,同时产生可再生的沼气,可以转化为电力和热能,产生收入并支持经济增长。在具有支持性废物管理和能源回收激励措施的地区,AcoD的实施最为先进,在这些地区,FW与WS共消化已成为一种既能获得环境效益又能获得经济效益的可行途径。AcoD运行能源需求存在,甲烷燃烧产生的电力显著抵消了这些成本,改善了约93% - 196%的能源平衡,并有助于减少高达97%的温室气体排放。这篇综述强调了AcoD系统的经济可行性和环境效益,强调了它们在发电和更广泛的温室气体抵消方面的作用。此外,研究结果强调了通过激励和监管机制支持AcoD部署的政策框架的重要性。生命周期评估(LCA)对于量化净环境影响和为采用acd的决策提供信息至关重要。通过推进AcoD技术并将其纳入国家气候和废物战略,政策制定者可以促进循环经济实践,同时显著降低有机废物处理的全球变暖潜能值(GWP)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信