Experimental study on combustion and emission characteristics of an ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine under single and double injection strategies

IF 5.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Shouzhen Zhang, Qinglong Tang, Rui Yang, Haifeng Liu, Mingfa Yao
{"title":"Experimental study on combustion and emission characteristics of an ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine under single and double injection strategies","authors":"Shouzhen Zhang,&nbsp;Qinglong Tang,&nbsp;Rui Yang,&nbsp;Haifeng Liu,&nbsp;Mingfa Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.proci.2025.105872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compares the effects of single and double diesel injection strategies on the combustion and emission characteristics of an ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine at medium loads, as well as their potential for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under different ammonia substitution ratios. At a 70% ammonia substitution ratio, single injection with early injection timing enhances the local mixture reactivity, shortens the ignition delay, and strengthens the diesel ignition, thereby improving ammonia combustion efficiency. Under the double injection strategy, the pilot injection of diesel forms a premixed charge with ammonia in the cylinder, accelerating the overall combustion speed and shortening the combustion duration compared to single injection, which benefits thermal efficiency. Overall, at a low ammonia substitution ratio (50%), the double injection strategy shows advantages in terms of indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) and GHG emissions. However, at a higher ammonia substitution ratio (70%), the ITE of both single and double injection strategies is nearly identical, but single injection results in lower emissions of GHG, N<sub>2</sub>O, and unburned NH<sub>3</sub>. At a 70% ammonia substitution ratio, the minimum GHG emissions of the single injection strategy reach 229.9 g/kW·h, representing a 61.5% reduction compared to the pure diesel mode. This demonstrates that the ammonia-diesel dual-fuel mode has significant potential for GHG reduction in internal combustion engines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":408,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 105872"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748925000860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares the effects of single and double diesel injection strategies on the combustion and emission characteristics of an ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine at medium loads, as well as their potential for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under different ammonia substitution ratios. At a 70% ammonia substitution ratio, single injection with early injection timing enhances the local mixture reactivity, shortens the ignition delay, and strengthens the diesel ignition, thereby improving ammonia combustion efficiency. Under the double injection strategy, the pilot injection of diesel forms a premixed charge with ammonia in the cylinder, accelerating the overall combustion speed and shortening the combustion duration compared to single injection, which benefits thermal efficiency. Overall, at a low ammonia substitution ratio (50%), the double injection strategy shows advantages in terms of indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) and GHG emissions. However, at a higher ammonia substitution ratio (70%), the ITE of both single and double injection strategies is nearly identical, but single injection results in lower emissions of GHG, N2O, and unburned NH3. At a 70% ammonia substitution ratio, the minimum GHG emissions of the single injection strategy reach 229.9 g/kW·h, representing a 61.5% reduction compared to the pure diesel mode. This demonstrates that the ammonia-diesel dual-fuel mode has significant potential for GHG reduction in internal combustion engines.
氨柴油双燃料发动机单喷和双喷燃烧与排放特性试验研究
本研究比较了单喷和双喷柴油策略对氨柴油双燃料发动机中负荷燃烧和排放特性的影响,以及在不同氨替代比下减少温室气体排放的潜力。在氨替代比为70%时,单次喷油提前喷油,增强了混合气的局部反应性,缩短了点火延迟,增强了柴油机的点火能力,从而提高了氨燃烧效率。双喷策略下,柴油先导喷与氨在缸内形成预混装药,与单喷相比,整体燃烧速度加快,燃烧时间缩短,有利于热效率的提高。总体而言,在低氨替代比(50%)下,双注入策略在指示热效率(ITE)和温室气体排放方面显示出优势。然而,在较高的氨替代比(70%)下,单次和双次喷注策略的ITE几乎相同,但单次喷注导致GHG、N2O和未燃烧NH3的排放更低。当氨替代率为70%时,单次喷射策略的最小温室气体排放量达到229.9 g/kW·h,比纯柴油模式减少61.5%。这表明氨-柴油双燃料模式在内燃机中具有显著的温室气体减排潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains forefront contributions in fundamentals and applications of combustion science. For more than 50 years, the Combustion Institute has served as the peak international society for dissemination of scientific and technical research in the combustion field. In addition to author submissions, the Proceedings of the Combustion Institute includes the Institute''s prestigious invited strategic and topical reviews that represent indispensable resources for emergent research in the field. All papers are subjected to rigorous peer review. Research papers and invited topical reviews; Reaction Kinetics; Soot, PAH, and other large molecules; Diagnostics; Laminar Flames; Turbulent Flames; Heterogeneous Combustion; Spray and Droplet Combustion; Detonations, Explosions & Supersonic Combustion; Fire Research; Stationary Combustion Systems; IC Engine and Gas Turbine Combustion; New Technology Concepts The electronic version of Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains supplemental material such as reaction mechanisms, illustrating movies, and other data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信