{"title":"Life cycle assessment of pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing: A comparative analysis and systems model integration framework","authors":"Flora Bouchier , Astrid Boje , Gavin Reynolds","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpx.2025.100395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pharmaceutical drug products in the form of tablets are produced via a series of manufacturing steps, transforming powder blends to compacted granules with carefully selected properties such as tensile strength and dissolution time. Typical oral solid dosage form (OSD) manufacturing processes include direct compression (DC), roller compaction (RC), high shear granulation (HSG) and continuous direct compression (CDC). Design of each process step is required to achieve end-product quality for the specific material properties and available equipment, although design decisions are typically made without a quantitative understanding of the impact on product environmental footprint. Using a ‘cradle-to-gate’ life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, a quantitative sustainability comparison has been made between standard OSD manufacturing platforms across different production scales. The results demonstrate that for small batch sizes, DC produces tablets with the lowest carbon footprint, however at larger batch sizes, CDC is the most carbon efficient manufacturing platform. Due to the high carbon footprint of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), formulation process yields had the greatest impact on overall carbon footprint, although emissions from equipment energy, cleaning and facility overheads were also analysed. Data from these LCA models has been combined with systems models of the CDC manufacturing processes. These combined models are used to demonstrate the optimisation of processes to meet robust product quality attribute targets whilst identifying opportunities to minimise the drug product carbon footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14280,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100395"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590156725000805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pharmaceutical drug products in the form of tablets are produced via a series of manufacturing steps, transforming powder blends to compacted granules with carefully selected properties such as tensile strength and dissolution time. Typical oral solid dosage form (OSD) manufacturing processes include direct compression (DC), roller compaction (RC), high shear granulation (HSG) and continuous direct compression (CDC). Design of each process step is required to achieve end-product quality for the specific material properties and available equipment, although design decisions are typically made without a quantitative understanding of the impact on product environmental footprint. Using a ‘cradle-to-gate’ life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, a quantitative sustainability comparison has been made between standard OSD manufacturing platforms across different production scales. The results demonstrate that for small batch sizes, DC produces tablets with the lowest carbon footprint, however at larger batch sizes, CDC is the most carbon efficient manufacturing platform. Due to the high carbon footprint of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), formulation process yields had the greatest impact on overall carbon footprint, although emissions from equipment energy, cleaning and facility overheads were also analysed. Data from these LCA models has been combined with systems models of the CDC manufacturing processes. These combined models are used to demonstrate the optimisation of processes to meet robust product quality attribute targets whilst identifying opportunities to minimise the drug product carbon footprint.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X offers authors with high-quality research who want to publish in a gold open access journal the opportunity to make their work immediately, permanently, and freely accessible.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X authors will pay an article publishing charge (APC), have a choice of license options, and retain copyright. Please check the APC here. The journal is indexed in SCOPUS, PUBMED, PMC and DOAJ.
The International Journal of Pharmaceutics is the second most cited journal in the "Pharmacy & Pharmacology" category out of 358 journals, being the true home for pharmaceutical scientists concerned with the physical, chemical and biological properties of devices and delivery systems for drugs, vaccines and biologicals, including their design, manufacture and evaluation. This includes evaluation of the properties of drugs, excipients such as surfactants and polymers and novel materials. The journal has special sections on pharmaceutical nanotechnology and personalized medicines, and publishes research papers, reviews, commentaries and letters to the editor as well as special issues.