ADAMTS13 Activity Testing: Evaluation of Two Automated Platforms for Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

Margot Cornette, Katrien M J Devreese
{"title":"ADAMTS13 Activity Testing: Evaluation of Two Automated Platforms for Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.","authors":"Margot Cornette, Katrien M J Devreese","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by a severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity, typically defined as less than 10 IU/dL. Rapid and reliable measurement of ADAMTS13 activity is crucial for both timely diagnosis and effective long-term patient monitoring. While ELISA-based methods are widely used, automated assays offer potential advantages in terms of turnaround time and standardization. This study evaluates two automated ADAMTS13 activity assays, HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity Assay (Werfen) and TECHNOFLUOR ADAMTS13 Activity (Technoclone), in comparison to the TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13 Activity ELISA (Technoclone).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ADAMTS13 activity was measured in 100 patient samples using three assays: TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13 Activity ELISA, HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity, and TECHNOFLUOR ADAMTS13 Activity. Analytical performance and method comparison were assessed. Additionally, calibration against the WHO standard was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both automated assays demonstrated high precision, with lower coefficients of variation (CV) compared to the ELISA. The HemosIL assay showed CVs ranging from 4.6% to 7.1%, while the TECHNOFLUOR assay exhibited CVs between 3.0% and 3.3%. ADAMTS13 activity measurements obtained with ELISA were significantly higher than those from both automated assays, which showed no statistically significant difference between them. Both automated assays achieved a sensitivity of 100%, with one false-positive TTP classification. The HemosIL assay showed the greatest bias between WHO and manufacturer-based calibrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The automated systems exhibit strong performance and rapid turnaround times, making them well-suited for routine ADAMTS13 determination. Standardization and calibration against international benchmarks, such as the WHO standard, is essential to minimize inter-assay variability and ensure reliable clinical interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by a severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity, typically defined as less than 10 IU/dL. Rapid and reliable measurement of ADAMTS13 activity is crucial for both timely diagnosis and effective long-term patient monitoring. While ELISA-based methods are widely used, automated assays offer potential advantages in terms of turnaround time and standardization. This study evaluates two automated ADAMTS13 activity assays, HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity Assay (Werfen) and TECHNOFLUOR ADAMTS13 Activity (Technoclone), in comparison to the TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13 Activity ELISA (Technoclone).

Methods: ADAMTS13 activity was measured in 100 patient samples using three assays: TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13 Activity ELISA, HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity, and TECHNOFLUOR ADAMTS13 Activity. Analytical performance and method comparison were assessed. Additionally, calibration against the WHO standard was evaluated.

Results: Both automated assays demonstrated high precision, with lower coefficients of variation (CV) compared to the ELISA. The HemosIL assay showed CVs ranging from 4.6% to 7.1%, while the TECHNOFLUOR assay exhibited CVs between 3.0% and 3.3%. ADAMTS13 activity measurements obtained with ELISA were significantly higher than those from both automated assays, which showed no statistically significant difference between them. Both automated assays achieved a sensitivity of 100%, with one false-positive TTP classification. The HemosIL assay showed the greatest bias between WHO and manufacturer-based calibrations.

Conclusion: The automated systems exhibit strong performance and rapid turnaround times, making them well-suited for routine ADAMTS13 determination. Standardization and calibration against international benchmarks, such as the WHO standard, is essential to minimize inter-assay variability and ensure reliable clinical interpretation.

ADAMTS13活性测试:两种诊断和随访血栓性血小板减少性紫癜的自动化平台的评估。
前言:血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)是一种罕见但危及生命的血栓性微血管疾病,其特征是ADAMTS13活性严重缺乏,通常定义为低于10 IU/dL。快速可靠地测量ADAMTS13活性对于及时诊断和有效的长期患者监测至关重要。虽然基于elisa的方法被广泛使用,但自动化分析在周转时间和标准化方面提供了潜在的优势。本研究评估了两种自动化的ADAMTS13活性测定方法,即haemsil AcuStar ADAMTS13活性测定(Werfen)和TECHNOFLUOR ADAMTS13活性测定(Technoclone),与TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13活性ELISA (Technoclone)进行比较。方法:采用三种检测方法测定100例患者样品中的ADAMTS13活性:TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13活性ELISA、haemsil AcuStar ADAMTS13活性和TECHNOFLUOR ADAMTS13活性。评估分析性能和方法比较。此外,根据世卫组织标准进行了校准评估。结果:与ELISA相比,两种自动检测方法均具有较高的准确度,变异系数(CV)较低。haemsil检测的CVs范围为4.6%至7.1%,而TECHNOFLUOR检测的CVs范围为3.0%至3.3%。ELISA获得的ADAMTS13活性测量值显著高于两种自动测定法,两者之间无统计学差异。两种自动检测方法均达到100%的灵敏度,仅有一例TTP假阳性分类。haemsil测定显示在世卫组织和基于制造商的校准之间存在最大偏差。结论:自动化系统表现出强大的性能和快速的周转时间,使其非常适合常规的ADAMTS13测定。根据国际基准(如世卫组织标准)进行标准化和校准对于最大限度地减少测定间的差异和确保可靠的临床解释至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信