Bridging structure and selectivity in chaperone-mediated autophagy: towards targeted therapeutics.

IF 4.2
Devid Sahu, Ishwar Patel, Kharishni Lakshman, Koyeli Mapa, Nidhi Malhotra
{"title":"Bridging structure and selectivity in chaperone-mediated autophagy: towards targeted therapeutics.","authors":"Devid Sahu, Ishwar Patel, Kharishni Lakshman, Koyeli Mapa, Nidhi Malhotra","doi":"10.1111/febs.70262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is a pivotal cellular process essential for maintaining homeostasis by selectively degrading damaged or non-essential proteins, and its impairment is associated with numerous diseases. The allure of CMA lies in its selectivity, a trait that holds the potential of revolutionising healthcare, offering superior therapies and paving the way for a future in which drug resistance is conquered. Thus, understanding the factors that dictate selectivity in the pathway is indispensable. CMA degrades only a subset of proteins, and its selectivity is regulated by two key proteins, namely heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (HSPA8; also known as Hsc70) and lysosome-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP2A). However, structural insights into these proteins, which are responsible for CMA functionality, are still in their infancy. We collated literature in search of answering unresolved questions, such as: what unique structural cues mark a protein as a CMA target? How does the Hsc70 along with co-chaperones decipher these cues? Where does Hsc70 bind to its co-chaperone? What is the substrate binding site in Hsc70, and how does the Hsc70-substrate complex bind to LAMP2A? What are the structural secrets governing LAMP2A's assembly into multimers and its role in shuttling substrates to the lysosome? Although direct answers to some of these questions are currently elusive due to the absence of experimental structures of selectively bound complexes, we have collated existing information to assess their potential resolution. Additionally, we review current structural insights into the therapeutic strategies targeting these proteins and the pathway. Comprehension unveils potential avenues for therapeutic innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94226,"journal":{"name":"The FEBS journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The FEBS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.70262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is a pivotal cellular process essential for maintaining homeostasis by selectively degrading damaged or non-essential proteins, and its impairment is associated with numerous diseases. The allure of CMA lies in its selectivity, a trait that holds the potential of revolutionising healthcare, offering superior therapies and paving the way for a future in which drug resistance is conquered. Thus, understanding the factors that dictate selectivity in the pathway is indispensable. CMA degrades only a subset of proteins, and its selectivity is regulated by two key proteins, namely heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (HSPA8; also known as Hsc70) and lysosome-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP2A). However, structural insights into these proteins, which are responsible for CMA functionality, are still in their infancy. We collated literature in search of answering unresolved questions, such as: what unique structural cues mark a protein as a CMA target? How does the Hsc70 along with co-chaperones decipher these cues? Where does Hsc70 bind to its co-chaperone? What is the substrate binding site in Hsc70, and how does the Hsc70-substrate complex bind to LAMP2A? What are the structural secrets governing LAMP2A's assembly into multimers and its role in shuttling substrates to the lysosome? Although direct answers to some of these questions are currently elusive due to the absence of experimental structures of selectively bound complexes, we have collated existing information to assess their potential resolution. Additionally, we review current structural insights into the therapeutic strategies targeting these proteins and the pathway. Comprehension unveils potential avenues for therapeutic innovation.

伴侣介导的自噬的桥接结构和选择性:面向靶向治疗。
伴侣介导的自噬(CMA)是一个关键的细胞过程,通过选择性地降解受损或非必需蛋白来维持体内平衡,其损伤与许多疾病有关。CMA的魅力在于它的选择性,这一特性有可能彻底改变医疗保健,提供更好的治疗方法,并为战胜耐药性的未来铺平道路。因此,了解决定通路选择性的因素是必不可少的。CMA只降解一小部分蛋白,其选择性受两个关键蛋白调控,即热休克同源蛋白71 kDa (HSPA8,也称为Hsc70)和溶酶体相关膜蛋白2A (LAMP2A)。然而,对这些负责CMA功能的蛋白质的结构见解仍处于起步阶段。我们整理文献以寻找尚未解决的问题的答案,例如:哪些独特的结构线索标志着蛋白质是CMA靶标?Hsc70和同伴是如何解读这些线索的?Hsc70在哪里与其伴侣结合?Hsc70的底物结合位点是什么? Hsc70-底物复合物如何与LAMP2A结合?控制LAMP2A组装成多聚体及其在将底物运送到溶酶体中的作用的结构秘密是什么?尽管由于缺乏选择性结合复合物的实验结构,这些问题的直接答案目前难以捉摸,但我们已经整理了现有的信息来评估它们的潜在解决方案。此外,我们回顾了目前针对这些蛋白质和通路的治疗策略的结构见解。综合揭示了治疗创新的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信