Titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers from a General Hospital in Mexico City.

IF 3 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Nelly Raquel González-Arenas, Mariana Dinazar Chavez-Vargas, Hector Prado-Calleros, Juan Pablo Ramírez-Hinojosa, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Angélica Olivo-Díaz, Pablo Maravilla, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Guillermina Ávila-Ramírez
{"title":"Titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers from a General Hospital in Mexico City.","authors":"Nelly Raquel González-Arenas, Mariana Dinazar Chavez-Vargas, Hector Prado-Calleros, Juan Pablo Ramírez-Hinojosa, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Angélica Olivo-Díaz, Pablo Maravilla, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Guillermina Ávila-Ramírez","doi":"10.3390/diseases13090276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to better understand the antibody concentrations in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a hospital in Mexico City with a high density of COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Up to 243 HCWs were recruited in 2020 and 2022 and were sorted into three groups: hybrid immunity (HI, natural infection plus vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (VI), and unvaccinated but RT-qPCR negative at the beginning of the pandemic (UV). Peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained; additionally, saliva samples were obtained from the UV group. The titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NCP) proteins were assessed using an in-house ELISA, and positivity to the virus was determined via RT-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most HI and VI participants were positive for serum anti-RBD IgG (92.8% and 100%, respectively), while 26.6% (for HI) and 19% (for VI) were positive for anti-NCP IgG. Regarding serum anti-RBD IgA, the VI and HI groups had positive rates of 87.3% and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the UV group showed a rate of 5.7% but the positivity for IgA in saliva was higher (52% for RBD and 35% for NCP). In addition, the highest antibody titers were obtained for anti-RBD IgG and IgA in the HI and VI groups, respectively. In saliva, the IgA antibody titer was higher for the RBD antigen (1:1280).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results strengthen our understanding of antibody concentrations in HCWs during two critical years of the pandemic in a general hospital with many COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13090276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to better understand the antibody concentrations in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a hospital in Mexico City with a high density of COVID-19 patients.

Methods: Up to 243 HCWs were recruited in 2020 and 2022 and were sorted into three groups: hybrid immunity (HI, natural infection plus vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (VI), and unvaccinated but RT-qPCR negative at the beginning of the pandemic (UV). Peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained; additionally, saliva samples were obtained from the UV group. The titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NCP) proteins were assessed using an in-house ELISA, and positivity to the virus was determined via RT-qPCR.

Results: Most HI and VI participants were positive for serum anti-RBD IgG (92.8% and 100%, respectively), while 26.6% (for HI) and 19% (for VI) were positive for anti-NCP IgG. Regarding serum anti-RBD IgA, the VI and HI groups had positive rates of 87.3% and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the UV group showed a rate of 5.7% but the positivity for IgA in saliva was higher (52% for RBD and 35% for NCP). In addition, the highest antibody titers were obtained for anti-RBD IgG and IgA in the HI and VI groups, respectively. In saliva, the IgA antibody titer was higher for the RBD antigen (1:1280).

Conclusions: These results strengthen our understanding of antibody concentrations in HCWs during two critical years of the pandemic in a general hospital with many COVID-19 patients.

墨西哥城某综合医院医护人员抗SARS-CoV-2的IgG、IgM和IgA滴度
目的:本研究的目的是更好地了解来自墨西哥城一家高密度COVID-19患者医院的医护人员(HCWs)的抗体浓度。方法:在2020年和2022年招募了243名卫生保健工作者,并将其分为三组:混合免疫组(HI,自然感染加疫苗接种)、疫苗诱导免疫组(VI)和大流行开始时未接种疫苗但RT-qPCR阴性的组(UV)。采集外周血和鼻咽拭子标本;此外,还采集了紫外线组的唾液样本。采用ELISA检测SARS-CoV-2受体结合域(RBD)和核衣壳(NCP)蛋白的IgG、IgM和IgA滴度,RT-qPCR检测病毒阳性。结果:HI和VI参与者血清抗rbd IgG阳性率分别为92.8%和100%,HI和VI参与者血清抗ncp IgG阳性率分别为26.6%和19%。血清抗rbd IgA阳性率,VI组为87.3%,HI组为66%。相比之下,UV组的阳性率为5.7%,但唾液中IgA的阳性率更高(RBD为52%,NCP为35%)。此外,抗rbd IgG和IgA抗体滴度分别在HI和VI组中最高。唾液中RBD抗原的IgA抗体效价较高(1:1280)。结论:这些结果加强了我们对一家有许多COVID-19患者的综合医院在大流行的两个关键年份中医护人员抗体浓度的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信