Pharmacists' Opinions on the Policy for Controlling the Sale of Drugs That Have Been Abused in Thailand.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-09-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S540234
Thanapong Poophalee, Kornkaew Chanthapasa, Rungpetch Sakulbumrungsil, Nusaraporn Kessomboon, Khunjira Udomaksorn
{"title":"Pharmacists' Opinions on the Policy for Controlling the Sale of Drugs That Have Been Abused in Thailand.","authors":"Thanapong Poophalee, Kornkaew Chanthapasa, Rungpetch Sakulbumrungsil, Nusaraporn Kessomboon, Khunjira Udomaksorn","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S540234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medication abuse is a major global issue due to its health risks. In Thailand, regulation of drug sales is overseen by the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study aimed to examine pharmacists' opinions on policies regarding the control and monitoring of the sales of drug that have been abused in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method design was employed, combining a survey of 440 pharmacy pharmacists and 77 regulatory enforcement pharmacists selected through accidental sampling with in-depth interviews of 17 pharmacists recruited via purposive and snowball sampling until data saturation. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, while interview data were examined using content analysis. Data were collected nationwide in Thailand between April and October 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 80% of respondents understood the policy measures, yet most reported limited effectiveness and unintended consequences. Nearly 90% indicated that maintaining drug sales records drives high-risk buyers to underground markets while increasing workloads and leading some pharmacies to discontinue sales. Respondents favored eliminating or digitalizing records. The FDA Reporter system was viewed as useful, but incomplete and retrospective data limited its effectiveness. Participants recommended real-time integration across the supply chain. Restrictions on retail and wholesale quantities were considered only partially effective, often burdening patients requiring continuous treatment. By contrast, requiring pharmacists to comply with Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) and personally dispense dangerous drugs was regarded as the most effective measure. Interviews also align with the survey and highlighted persistent issues such as \"hanging-license pharmacies\" and emphasized stricter enforcement, intersectoral collaboration, and education for at-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current measures to control drug sales remain ineffective, leading to diversion, increased workloads, and discontinued sales. Enforcing Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) has proven more effective. Policy strengthening should focus on modernizing electronic reporting, eliminating rigid quantity limits, and enforcing pharmacist presence during operating hours for safe, responsible drug distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3129-3142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S540234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Medication abuse is a major global issue due to its health risks. In Thailand, regulation of drug sales is overseen by the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study aimed to examine pharmacists' opinions on policies regarding the control and monitoring of the sales of drug that have been abused in Thailand.

Methods: A mixed-method design was employed, combining a survey of 440 pharmacy pharmacists and 77 regulatory enforcement pharmacists selected through accidental sampling with in-depth interviews of 17 pharmacists recruited via purposive and snowball sampling until data saturation. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, while interview data were examined using content analysis. Data were collected nationwide in Thailand between April and October 2023.

Results: Over 80% of respondents understood the policy measures, yet most reported limited effectiveness and unintended consequences. Nearly 90% indicated that maintaining drug sales records drives high-risk buyers to underground markets while increasing workloads and leading some pharmacies to discontinue sales. Respondents favored eliminating or digitalizing records. The FDA Reporter system was viewed as useful, but incomplete and retrospective data limited its effectiveness. Participants recommended real-time integration across the supply chain. Restrictions on retail and wholesale quantities were considered only partially effective, often burdening patients requiring continuous treatment. By contrast, requiring pharmacists to comply with Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) and personally dispense dangerous drugs was regarded as the most effective measure. Interviews also align with the survey and highlighted persistent issues such as "hanging-license pharmacies" and emphasized stricter enforcement, intersectoral collaboration, and education for at-risk groups.

Conclusion: Current measures to control drug sales remain ineffective, leading to diversion, increased workloads, and discontinued sales. Enforcing Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) has proven more effective. Policy strengthening should focus on modernizing electronic reporting, eliminating rigid quantity limits, and enforcing pharmacist presence during operating hours for safe, responsible drug distribution.

泰国药师对管制滥用药品销售政策的意见。
背景和目标:药物滥用因其健康风险而成为一个重大的全球性问题。在泰国,药品销售的监管是由泰国食品和药物管理局(FDA)监督的。本研究旨在研究药剂师对泰国滥用药物销售的控制和监测政策的意见。方法:采用混合方法设计,通过随机抽样抽取440名药店药师和77名监管执法药师进行调查,并通过目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的方式对17名药师进行深度访谈,直至数据饱和。调查数据采用描述性分析,而访谈数据采用内容分析。数据于2023年4月至10月在泰国全国范围内收集。结果:超过80%的受访者了解政策措施,但大多数人报告的效果有限,并产生了意想不到的后果。近90%的人表示,保留药品销售记录会导致高风险买家进入地下市场,同时增加工作量,导致一些药店停止销售。受访者支持消除或数字化记录。FDA报告系统被认为是有用的,但不完整和回顾性数据限制了其有效性。与会者建议对整个供应链进行实时集成。对零售和批发数量的限制被认为只是部分有效,往往增加了需要持续治疗的患者的负担。相比之下,要求药师遵守《药品管理规范》(GPP),亲自配药是最有效的措施。访谈也与调查结果保持一致,突出了“挂执照药店”等持续存在的问题,并强调了更严格的执法、部门间合作和对风险群体的教育。结论:目前控制药品销售的措施仍然无效,导致分流、工作量增加和销售中断。事实证明,实施良好药房规范(GPP)更为有效。政策的加强应侧重于电子报告的现代化,消除严格的数量限制,并在营业时间内加强药剂师的存在,以确保安全,负责任的药物分发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信