Ethics of AI in healthcare: a scoping review demonstrating applicability of a foundational framework.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1662642
Aaron J Gorelik, Mengyuan Li, Jessica Hahne, Junyi Wang, Yongqi Ren, Lei Yang, Xin Zhang, Xing Liu, Xiaomin Wang, Ryan Bogdan, Brian D Carpenter
{"title":"Ethics of AI in healthcare: a scoping review demonstrating applicability of a foundational framework.","authors":"Aaron J Gorelik, Mengyuan Li, Jessica Hahne, Junyi Wang, Yongqi Ren, Lei Yang, Xin Zhang, Xing Liu, Xiaomin Wang, Ryan Bogdan, Brian D Carpenter","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1662642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being adopted across many industries including healthcare. This has brought forth the development of many new independent ethical frameworks for responsible use of AI within institutions and companies. Risks associated with the application of AI in healthcare have high stakes for patients. Further, the existence of multiple frameworks may exacerbate these risks due to potential differences in interpretation and prioritization in said frameworks. Resolving these risks requires an ethical framework that is both broadly adopted in healthcare settings and applicable to AI. Here, we examined whether a framework consisting of the 4 well-established principles of biomedical ethics (i.e., Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, Respect for Autonomy, and Justice) can serve as a foundation for an ethical framework for AI in healthcare. To this end, we conducted a scoping review of 227 peer-reviewed papers using semi-inductive thematic analyses to categorize patient-related ethical issues in healthcare AI under these 4 principles of biomedical ethics. We found that these principles, which are already widely adopted in healthcare settings, were comprehensively and internationally applicable to ethical considerations concerning use of AI in healthcare. The existing four principles of biomedical ethics can provide a foundational ethical framework for applying AI in healthcare, grounding other Responsible AI frameworks, and can act as a basis for AI governance and policy in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1662642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1662642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being adopted across many industries including healthcare. This has brought forth the development of many new independent ethical frameworks for responsible use of AI within institutions and companies. Risks associated with the application of AI in healthcare have high stakes for patients. Further, the existence of multiple frameworks may exacerbate these risks due to potential differences in interpretation and prioritization in said frameworks. Resolving these risks requires an ethical framework that is both broadly adopted in healthcare settings and applicable to AI. Here, we examined whether a framework consisting of the 4 well-established principles of biomedical ethics (i.e., Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, Respect for Autonomy, and Justice) can serve as a foundation for an ethical framework for AI in healthcare. To this end, we conducted a scoping review of 227 peer-reviewed papers using semi-inductive thematic analyses to categorize patient-related ethical issues in healthcare AI under these 4 principles of biomedical ethics. We found that these principles, which are already widely adopted in healthcare settings, were comprehensively and internationally applicable to ethical considerations concerning use of AI in healthcare. The existing four principles of biomedical ethics can provide a foundational ethical framework for applying AI in healthcare, grounding other Responsible AI frameworks, and can act as a basis for AI governance and policy in healthcare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医疗保健中的人工智能伦理:展示基础框架适用性的范围审查。
包括医疗保健在内的许多行业越来越多地采用人工智能(AI)。这带来了许多新的独立道德框架的发展,在机构和公司内部负责任地使用人工智能。人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用带来的风险对患者来说是高风险的。此外,多个框架的存在可能会加剧这些风险,因为这些框架在解释和优先级方面存在潜在差异。解决这些风险需要一个在医疗保健环境中广泛采用并适用于人工智能的道德框架。在这里,我们研究了由4个公认的生物医学伦理原则(即仁慈、非恶意、尊重自治和正义)组成的框架是否可以作为医疗保健领域人工智能伦理框架的基础。为此,我们对227篇同行评议的论文进行了范围审查,使用半归纳主题分析,根据这四项生物医学伦理原则对医疗人工智能中与患者相关的伦理问题进行了分类。我们发现,这些原则已经在医疗保健环境中被广泛采用,在医疗保健中使用人工智能的伦理考虑方面是全面和国际适用的。现有的四项生物医学伦理原则可以为在医疗保健中应用人工智能提供基本的伦理框架,为其他负责任的人工智能框架奠定基础,并可以作为医疗保健领域人工智能治理和政策的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信