Differences in Body Composition and Lower Limb Strength Between Novice and Amateur Marathon Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.3390/sports13090287
Tianxin Shi, Qingzhao Shi, Shuang Ren, Xiaorui Huang, Jun Ren, Xin Gao, Jingxian Zhu
{"title":"Differences in Body Composition and Lower Limb Strength Between Novice and Amateur Marathon Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Tianxin Shi, Qingzhao Shi, Shuang Ren, Xiaorui Huang, Jun Ren, Xin Gao, Jingxian Zhu","doi":"10.3390/sports13090287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the body composition and strength of the lower extremity parameters between novice runners (NRs) and amateur marathon runners (AMRs). A total of 50 NRs (33.84 ± 4.32 years) and 50 AMRs (33.36 ± 5.55 years) were analyzed cross-sectionally. Bioelectrical impedance analysis measured body composition parameters, and isokinetic testing assessed knee muscle strength. The results showed that compared to AMRs, NRs had lower fat-free mass (FFM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and total body water (TBW) (-15, -12, and -5%; all <i>p</i> < 0.01) but higher body fat percentage (PBF) and visceral fat area (VFA) (+27 and +32%; both <i>p</i> < 0.01). They also had 6% lower knee extensor (KE) strength and 31% lower knee flexor (KF) strength on the dominant legs (DLs) and 14% lower KF strength on the non-dominant legs (NDLs). In addition, their hamstring-quadriceps ratio (H: Q) was 24% lower on the DLs and 9% lower on the NDLs. The NRs exhibited significant negative correlations between PBF, VFA, and knee muscle strength (r = -0.54 to -0.42, <i>p</i> < 0.01), while the AMRs had significant negative correlations only for PBF (r = -0.59 to -0.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In conclusion, the NRs exhibited lower FFM and TBW, higher PBF and VFA, and reduced muscle strength. In contrast, the AMRs exhibited the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that NRs with elevated body fat (BF) indicators should prioritize fat reduction and performance enhancement, while those with lower muscle mass require targeted programs to increase muscle capacity and joint stability. This approach may advance them toward the level of AMRs. Future studies should adopt longitudinal designs to explore how training interventions influence the physiological adaptations observed in runners at different experience levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the body composition and strength of the lower extremity parameters between novice runners (NRs) and amateur marathon runners (AMRs). A total of 50 NRs (33.84 ± 4.32 years) and 50 AMRs (33.36 ± 5.55 years) were analyzed cross-sectionally. Bioelectrical impedance analysis measured body composition parameters, and isokinetic testing assessed knee muscle strength. The results showed that compared to AMRs, NRs had lower fat-free mass (FFM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and total body water (TBW) (-15, -12, and -5%; all p < 0.01) but higher body fat percentage (PBF) and visceral fat area (VFA) (+27 and +32%; both p < 0.01). They also had 6% lower knee extensor (KE) strength and 31% lower knee flexor (KF) strength on the dominant legs (DLs) and 14% lower KF strength on the non-dominant legs (NDLs). In addition, their hamstring-quadriceps ratio (H: Q) was 24% lower on the DLs and 9% lower on the NDLs. The NRs exhibited significant negative correlations between PBF, VFA, and knee muscle strength (r = -0.54 to -0.42, p < 0.01), while the AMRs had significant negative correlations only for PBF (r = -0.59 to -0.57, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the NRs exhibited lower FFM and TBW, higher PBF and VFA, and reduced muscle strength. In contrast, the AMRs exhibited the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that NRs with elevated body fat (BF) indicators should prioritize fat reduction and performance enhancement, while those with lower muscle mass require targeted programs to increase muscle capacity and joint stability. This approach may advance them toward the level of AMRs. Future studies should adopt longitudinal designs to explore how training interventions influence the physiological adaptations observed in runners at different experience levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

马拉松新手和业余跑者身体组成和下肢力量的差异:一项横断面研究。
本研究比较了马拉松新手(NRs)和业余马拉松运动员(AMRs)的身体组成和下肢力量参数。对50例NRs(33.84±4.32年)和50例AMRs(33.36±5.55年)进行横断面分析。生物电阻抗分析测量身体组成参数,等速运动测试评估膝关节肌肉力量。结果表明,与AMRs相比,NRs的无脂质量(FFM)、骨骼肌质量(SMM)和全身水分(TBW)(- 15%、- 12%和-5%,p均< 0.01)较低,体脂率(PBF)和内脏脂肪面积(VFA)较高(+ 27%和+32%,p均< 0.01)。他们的优势腿(dl)也有6%的下膝伸肌(KE)强度和31%的下膝屈肌(KF)强度,而非优势腿(ndl)的KF强度低14%。此外,他们的腘绳肌-股四头肌比率(H: Q)在DLs和NDLs上分别低24%和9%。NRs与PBF、VFA和膝关节肌力呈显著负相关(r = -0.54 ~ -0.42, p < 0.01),而AMRs仅与PBF呈显著负相关(r = -0.59 ~ -0.57, p < 0.001)。综上所述,NRs表现出较低的FFM和TBW,较高的PBF和VFA,肌肉力量降低。相比之下,amr表现出相反的模式。这些发现表明,体脂(BF)指标升高的nr应优先考虑减脂和提高性能,而肌肉质量较低的nr则需要有针对性的方案来增加肌肉容量和关节稳定性。这种方法可能会将它们推进到抗菌素耐药性的水平。未来的研究应该采用纵向设计来探索训练干预如何影响不同经验水平的跑步者所观察到的生理适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信