Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Early Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Performance with MDCT and fFOV DWI.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Guodong Song, Guangbin Wang, Leping Li, Liang Shang, Shuai Duan, Zhenzhen Wang, Yubo Liu
{"title":"Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Early Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Performance with MDCT and fFOV DWI.","authors":"Guodong Song, Guangbin Wang, Leping Li, Liang Shang, Shuai Duan, Zhenzhen Wang, Yubo Liu","doi":"10.2174/0115734056390767250917221319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of gastric cancer remains challenging for many of the current imaging techniques. Recent advancements in reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have shown promise in improving the visualization of small anatomical structures. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of rFOV DWI with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and conventional full field of view (fFOV) DWI for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 43 patients with pathologically confirmed EGC. All participants underwent pre-treatment imaging, including CT scans and MRI with a prototype rFOV DWI and conventional fFOV DWI at 3 Tesla. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality) assessments were performed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rFOV DWI demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR compared with fFOV DWI (P < 0.05). Subjective image quality scores were also superior for rFOV DWI (P < 0.05). In lesion detection, rFOV DWI showed higher sensitivity (0.705) than CT (0.636) and fFOV DWI (0.523). ROC analysis revealed that rFOV DWI had a higher AUC (0.829, 95% CI [0.764, 0.882]) than fFOV DWI (0.734, 95% CI [0.661, 0.798], P = 0.02) and a modest improvement over CT (0.799, 95% CI [0.731, 0.856], P = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest that rFOV DWI provides superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy for EGC detection compared with conventional fFOV DWI. While it showed a trend toward better performance than CT, further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rFOV DWI offers improved image quality and diagnostic performance for early gastric cancer detection compared with fFOV DWI, with a potential advantage over CT. This technique may enhance early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056390767250917221319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early detection of gastric cancer remains challenging for many of the current imaging techniques. Recent advancements in reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have shown promise in improving the visualization of small anatomical structures. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of rFOV DWI with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and conventional full field of view (fFOV) DWI for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC).

Methods: This retrospective study included 43 patients with pathologically confirmed EGC. All participants underwent pre-treatment imaging, including CT scans and MRI with a prototype rFOV DWI and conventional fFOV DWI at 3 Tesla. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality) assessments were performed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: rFOV DWI demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR compared with fFOV DWI (P < 0.05). Subjective image quality scores were also superior for rFOV DWI (P < 0.05). In lesion detection, rFOV DWI showed higher sensitivity (0.705) than CT (0.636) and fFOV DWI (0.523). ROC analysis revealed that rFOV DWI had a higher AUC (0.829, 95% CI [0.764, 0.882]) than fFOV DWI (0.734, 95% CI [0.661, 0.798], P = 0.02) and a modest improvement over CT (0.799, 95% CI [0.731, 0.856], P = 0.51).

Discussion: The findings suggest that rFOV DWI provides superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy for EGC detection compared with conventional fFOV DWI. While it showed a trend toward better performance than CT, further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.

Conclusion: rFOV DWI offers improved image quality and diagnostic performance for early gastric cancer detection compared with fFOV DWI, with a potential advantage over CT. This technique may enhance early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer management.

缩小视场扩散加权磁共振成像检测早期胃癌:与MDCT和fFOV DWI诊断性能比较的初步研究。
导读:早期发现胃癌仍然是当前许多成像技术的挑战。缩小视场(rFOV)扩散加权成像(DWI)的最新进展显示出改善小解剖结构可视化的希望。本研究旨在评价和比较rFOV DWI与多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)和常规全视野(fFOV) DWI对早期胃癌(EGC)的诊断价值。方法:对43例经病理证实的胃癌患者进行回顾性研究。所有参与者都进行了预处理成像,包括CT扫描和MRI,并使用了3特斯拉的原型rFOV DWI和传统的fFOV DWI。进行定量(信噪比[SNR],对比噪声比[CNR])和定性(主观图像质量)评估。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估诊断效果。结果:rFOV DWI的信噪比和信噪比均高于fFOV DWI (P < 0.05)。rFOV DWI的主观图像质量评分也高于rFOV DWI (P < 0.05)。rFOV DWI对病变的检测灵敏度(0.705)高于CT(0.636)和fFOV DWI(0.523)。ROC分析显示,rFOV DWI的AUC (0.829, 95% CI[0.764, 0.882])高于fFOV DWI (0.734, 95% CI [0.661, 0.798], P = 0.02),较CT有适度改善(0.799,95% CI [0.731, 0.856], P = 0.51)。讨论:研究结果表明,与传统的fFOV DWI相比,rFOV DWI在EGC检测中提供了更好的图像质量和诊断准确性。虽然它显示出比CT更好的表现趋势,但需要进一步的更大规模的研究来验证这些结果。结论:与fFOV DWI相比,rFOV DWI在早期胃癌检测中具有更高的图像质量和诊断性能,与CT相比具有潜在优势。该技术可提高胃癌的早期诊断和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信