Implications of case definition selection on traumatic brain injury trends: A controlled interrupted time-series analysis of North Carolina emergency department data.
IF 3 3区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lucas M Neuroth, Yuni Tang, Anna E Waller, Katherine J Harmon
{"title":"Implications of case definition selection on traumatic brain injury trends: A controlled interrupted time-series analysis of North Carolina emergency department data.","authors":"Lucas M Neuroth, Yuni Tang, Anna E Waller, Katherine J Harmon","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2015, the CDC removed unspecified head injuries from its TBI surveillance case definition, complicating the investigation of long-term morbidity trends. We examined the long-term impact of this change on quantifying statewide TBI incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>North Carolina emergency department (ED) visit records were obtained from 2012 to 2024 and classified based on the presence (S09.90+) or absence (S09.90-) of the ICD-10-CM code for \"head injury, unspecified\". Segmented Poisson regression was used to compare slope- and level-changes in monthly TBI visit counts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2012 through September 2015, TBI visits increased at a rate of 14.9 visits per month. TBI visits dropped at the onset of COVID-19, and then rebounded after the relaxation of the state's stay-at-home-order; however, this trend was diminished under the S09.90- definition, with a difference of 75.9 (57.2-94.6) visits per month between the two definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of unspecified head injuries in the TBI surveillance case definition substantially altered statewide trends and their inclusion may better reflect injury burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"82-86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In 2015, the CDC removed unspecified head injuries from its TBI surveillance case definition, complicating the investigation of long-term morbidity trends. We examined the long-term impact of this change on quantifying statewide TBI incidence.
Methods: North Carolina emergency department (ED) visit records were obtained from 2012 to 2024 and classified based on the presence (S09.90+) or absence (S09.90-) of the ICD-10-CM code for "head injury, unspecified". Segmented Poisson regression was used to compare slope- and level-changes in monthly TBI visit counts.
Results: From January 2012 through September 2015, TBI visits increased at a rate of 14.9 visits per month. TBI visits dropped at the onset of COVID-19, and then rebounded after the relaxation of the state's stay-at-home-order; however, this trend was diminished under the S09.90- definition, with a difference of 75.9 (57.2-94.6) visits per month between the two definitions.
Conclusions: The presence of unspecified head injuries in the TBI surveillance case definition substantially altered statewide trends and their inclusion may better reflect injury burden.
期刊介绍:
The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.