Unveiling sex dimorphism in the healthy cardiac anatomy: Fundamental differences between male and female heart shapes.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Beatrice Moscoloni, Cameron Beeche, Julio A Chirinos, Patrick Segers, Mathias Peirlinck
{"title":"Unveiling sex dimorphism in the healthy cardiac anatomy: Fundamental differences between male and female heart shapes.","authors":"Beatrice Moscoloni, Cameron Beeche, Julio A Chirinos, Patrick Segers, Mathias Peirlinck","doi":"10.1113/JP288667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease are well documented, yet the precise nature and extent of these discrepancies in cardiac anatomy remain incompletely understood. Traditional scaling models often fail to capture the interplay of age, blood pressure and body size, prompting a more nuanced investigation. Here we use statistical shape modelling in a healthy subset (n = 456) of the UK Biobank to explore sex-specific variations in biventricular anatomy. We reconstruct 3D meshes and perform multivariate analyses of shape coefficients, controlling for age, blood pressure and various body size metrics. Our findings reveal that sex alone explains at least 25% of morphological variability, with strong discrimination between men and women (AUC = 0.96-0.71) persisting even after correction for confounders. Notably, the most discriminative modes highlight pronounced differences in cardiac chamber volumes, the anterior-posterior width of the right ventricle and the relative positioning of the cardiac chambers. These results underscore that sex has a fundamental influence on cardiac morphology, which may have important clinical implications for differing cardiac structural assessments in men and women. Future work should investigate how these anatomical differences manifest in various cardiovascular conditions, ultimately paving the way for more precise risk stratification and personalised therapeutic strategies for both men and women. KEY POINTS: Men's and women's hearts differ significantly in overall shape and size, but an in-depth quantification of these sex differences in healthy cardiac anatomy is lacking. We used a three-dimensional statistical shape modelling approach that goes beyond standard clinical measurements to capture subtle anatomical features. Our findings show that sex alone accounts for at least 25% of the natural variation in heart structure, even after correcting for age, blood pressure and various body size metric confounders. Female hearts consistently present smaller chambers and different inter-chamber positioning compared with male hearts. Our findings highlight the importance of sex-specific anatomical insights for better diagnosis, treatment and research on heart disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP288667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease are well documented, yet the precise nature and extent of these discrepancies in cardiac anatomy remain incompletely understood. Traditional scaling models often fail to capture the interplay of age, blood pressure and body size, prompting a more nuanced investigation. Here we use statistical shape modelling in a healthy subset (n = 456) of the UK Biobank to explore sex-specific variations in biventricular anatomy. We reconstruct 3D meshes and perform multivariate analyses of shape coefficients, controlling for age, blood pressure and various body size metrics. Our findings reveal that sex alone explains at least 25% of morphological variability, with strong discrimination between men and women (AUC = 0.96-0.71) persisting even after correction for confounders. Notably, the most discriminative modes highlight pronounced differences in cardiac chamber volumes, the anterior-posterior width of the right ventricle and the relative positioning of the cardiac chambers. These results underscore that sex has a fundamental influence on cardiac morphology, which may have important clinical implications for differing cardiac structural assessments in men and women. Future work should investigate how these anatomical differences manifest in various cardiovascular conditions, ultimately paving the way for more precise risk stratification and personalised therapeutic strategies for both men and women. KEY POINTS: Men's and women's hearts differ significantly in overall shape and size, but an in-depth quantification of these sex differences in healthy cardiac anatomy is lacking. We used a three-dimensional statistical shape modelling approach that goes beyond standard clinical measurements to capture subtle anatomical features. Our findings show that sex alone accounts for at least 25% of the natural variation in heart structure, even after correcting for age, blood pressure and various body size metric confounders. Female hearts consistently present smaller chambers and different inter-chamber positioning compared with male hearts. Our findings highlight the importance of sex-specific anatomical insights for better diagnosis, treatment and research on heart disease.

揭示健康心脏解剖中的性别二态性:男性和女性心脏形状的根本差异。
心血管疾病中基于性别的差异已被充分记录,但这些差异在心脏解剖学中的确切性质和程度仍未完全了解。传统的比例模型往往无法捕捉到年龄、血压和体型之间的相互作用,因此需要进行更细致的调查。在这里,我们在英国生物银行的一个健康子集(n = 456)中使用统计形状建模来探索双心室解剖的性别特异性变化。我们重建了三维网格,并对形状系数进行了多变量分析,控制了年龄、血压和各种体型指标。我们的研究结果表明,性别单独解释了至少25%的形态变异,即使在校正混杂因素后,男性和女性之间的强烈歧视(AUC = 0.96-0.71)仍然存在。值得注意的是,最具区别性的模式突出了心室体积、右心室前后宽度和心室相对位置的显著差异。这些结果强调,性别对心脏形态有根本的影响,这可能对男性和女性不同的心脏结构评估具有重要的临床意义。未来的工作应该研究这些解剖差异如何在各种心血管疾病中表现出来,最终为更精确的风险分层和针对男性和女性的个性化治疗策略铺平道路。重点:男性和女性的心脏在整体形状和大小上存在显著差异,但在健康心脏解剖中缺乏对这些性别差异的深入量化。我们使用了一种三维统计形状建模方法,超越了标准的临床测量来捕捉细微的解剖特征。我们的研究结果表明,即使在校正了年龄、血压和各种体型混杂因素后,性别本身至少占心脏结构自然变化的25%。与男性心脏相比,女性心脏始终呈现较小的腔室和不同的腔间位置。我们的研究结果强调了性别特异性解剖学见解对更好地诊断、治疗和研究心脏病的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信