Assessing Mental Health Literacy Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in South Africa.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Ernest Peresu, Gladys Kigozi-Male, Michelle Engelbrecht
{"title":"Assessing Mental Health Literacy Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in South Africa.","authors":"Ernest Peresu, Gladys Kigozi-Male, Michelle Engelbrecht","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Amidst a growing shortage of human resources for mental health, concerns persist over the mental health literacy (MHL) and readiness of nursing students to fulfil their future role as non-specialist mental healthcare providers. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the MHL among nursing students enrolled in a four-year nursing programme using the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) adapted and validated for primary health care workers in the South African context. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the factors influencing MHL among the nursing students. <b>Results:</b> Only a third of the 220 respondents (<i>n</i> = 73; 33.2%) expressed interest in specialising in mental health. A one-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in the MHLS scores across year levels, F(3, 216) = 3.225, <i>p</i> = 0.023, though Tukey post hoc analysis found no significant difference between second-year students (with mental health theory only) and third-/fourth-years (with both theoretical and clinical exposure, <i>p</i> = 0.295). Year of study, family history of mental illness, and career aspirations in mental health were significant predictors of MHL. While gender initially appeared significant, a sensitivity analysis suggested that this result may not be robust due to the small number of male participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> The absence of a significant difference in MHL among nursing students across years of study suggests limitations in how the nursing training programme integrates mental health theory with clinical practice. Nursing education stakeholders should review curricula and teaching strategies to ensure that MHL is effectively reinforced throughout training.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amidst a growing shortage of human resources for mental health, concerns persist over the mental health literacy (MHL) and readiness of nursing students to fulfil their future role as non-specialist mental healthcare providers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the MHL among nursing students enrolled in a four-year nursing programme using the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) adapted and validated for primary health care workers in the South African context. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the factors influencing MHL among the nursing students. Results: Only a third of the 220 respondents (n = 73; 33.2%) expressed interest in specialising in mental health. A one-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in the MHLS scores across year levels, F(3, 216) = 3.225, p = 0.023, though Tukey post hoc analysis found no significant difference between second-year students (with mental health theory only) and third-/fourth-years (with both theoretical and clinical exposure, p = 0.295). Year of study, family history of mental illness, and career aspirations in mental health were significant predictors of MHL. While gender initially appeared significant, a sensitivity analysis suggested that this result may not be robust due to the small number of male participants. Conclusions: The absence of a significant difference in MHL among nursing students across years of study suggests limitations in how the nursing training programme integrates mental health theory with clinical practice. Nursing education stakeholders should review curricula and teaching strategies to ensure that MHL is effectively reinforced throughout training.

南非护生心理健康素养评估
背景:在心理健康人力资源日益短缺的情况下,对心理健康素养(MHL)和护理学生是否准备好履行他们未来非专业心理保健提供者的角色的关注持续存在。方法:本研究采用南非初级卫生保健工作者的心理健康素养量表(MHLS)进行了一项横断面研究,以评估参加四年制护理课程的护理学生的心理健康素养。采用多元回归分析确定护生MHL的影响因素。结果:220名受访者中只有三分之一(n = 73; 33.2%)表示有兴趣专攻心理健康。单因素方差分析显示,MHLS得分在各年级水平上存在统计学显著差异,F(3,216) = 3.225, p = 0.023,尽管Tukey事后分析发现,二年级学生(仅学习心理健康理论)和三/四年级学生(同时学习理论和临床知识,p = 0.295)之间没有显著差异。学习年限、精神疾病家族史和心理健康方面的职业抱负是MHL的显著预测因子。虽然性别最初看起来很重要,但敏感性分析表明,由于男性参与者数量少,这一结果可能并不可靠。结论:护生的MHL在不同年限的学习中没有显著差异,这表明护理培训计划在如何将心理健康理论与临床实践相结合方面存在局限性。护理教育利益相关者应审查课程和教学策略,以确保在整个培训过程中有效加强MHL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信