The effect of tilt degree and position changes on video ocular counter-roll test performance.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Asya Fatma Men, Ayşenur Küçük Ceyhan
{"title":"The effect of tilt degree and position changes on video ocular counter-roll test performance.","authors":"Asya Fatma Men, Ayşenur Küçük Ceyhan","doi":"10.1177/09574271251382787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe vestibular system is essential for balance and visual stability and relies on the ocular counter-roll (OCR) reflex to regulate torsional eye movements during head tilt.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate how different tilt angles (15° and 45°) and tilt positions (head and body) influence static video Ocular Counter-Rolling (vOCR) responses in healthy individuals.MethodsA total of 30 healthy volunteers (17 females and 13 males), aged between 18 and 30 years, participated in the study. vOCR testing was conducted using the Interacoustics VisualEyes™ 525 video-oculography (VOG) system. Torsional eye movements were recorded at 15° and 45° during both lateral head tilt and body block tilt. Torsion degree, asymmetry, and gain values were analyzed and compared across all conditions.ResultsGain values did not significantly differ based on tilt angle or position (p > 0.05). The degree of torsional eye movement was significantly higher at 45° tilts compared to 15°, and greater during body tilt than head tilt (p < 0.0001). Asymmetry values remained within normal limits under all conditions and showed no significant differences (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThese findings indicate that the angle and position of tilt affect the magnitude of the rotational response, but that gain and asymmetry values remain consistent across conditions. This suggests that comparable gains can be obtained at different angles, such as 15° and 45°, and that low-angle tilts may be sufficient for evaluating otolith-ocular gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"9574271251382787"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271251382787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe vestibular system is essential for balance and visual stability and relies on the ocular counter-roll (OCR) reflex to regulate torsional eye movements during head tilt.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate how different tilt angles (15° and 45°) and tilt positions (head and body) influence static video Ocular Counter-Rolling (vOCR) responses in healthy individuals.MethodsA total of 30 healthy volunteers (17 females and 13 males), aged between 18 and 30 years, participated in the study. vOCR testing was conducted using the Interacoustics VisualEyes™ 525 video-oculography (VOG) system. Torsional eye movements were recorded at 15° and 45° during both lateral head tilt and body block tilt. Torsion degree, asymmetry, and gain values were analyzed and compared across all conditions.ResultsGain values did not significantly differ based on tilt angle or position (p > 0.05). The degree of torsional eye movement was significantly higher at 45° tilts compared to 15°, and greater during body tilt than head tilt (p < 0.0001). Asymmetry values remained within normal limits under all conditions and showed no significant differences (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThese findings indicate that the angle and position of tilt affect the magnitude of the rotational response, but that gain and asymmetry values remain consistent across conditions. This suggests that comparable gains can be obtained at different angles, such as 15° and 45°, and that low-angle tilts may be sufficient for evaluating otolith-ocular gain.

倾斜角度和位置变化对视频眼防滚试验性能的影响。
前庭系统对平衡和视觉稳定性至关重要,它依靠眼反滚反射来调节头部倾斜时的扭转眼运动。目的探讨不同的倾斜角度(15°和45°)和倾斜位置(头部和身体)对健康人静态视频眼反滚动(vOCR)反应的影响。方法选取年龄在18 ~ 30岁的健康志愿者30人,其中女性17人,男性13人。vOCR测试使用Interacoustics VisualEyes™525视频眼图(VOG)系统进行。在头侧倾斜和体块倾斜时,分别记录15°和45°扭眼运动。对所有条件下的扭度、不对称性和增益值进行了分析和比较。结果不同的倾斜角度和位置对增益值无显著影响(p < 0.05)。斜度为45°时的眼扭转运动程度明显高于斜度为15°时的眼扭转运动程度,身体倾斜时的眼扭转运动程度明显高于头部倾斜时的眼扭转运动程度(p < 0.0001)。各条件下不对称值均在正常范围内,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,倾斜的角度和位置影响旋转响应的大小,但增益和不对称值在不同条件下保持一致。这表明在不同角度(如15°和45°)可以获得相当的增益,并且低角度倾斜可能足以评估耳石-眼增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信