Measurement properties of the Swedish Brief Pain Coping Inventory-2 in patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain.

IF 1.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0026
Richard Thompson, Maria Fors, Jessica Andrée, Ann-Sofi Kammerlind, Kajsa Johansson
{"title":"Measurement properties of the Swedish Brief Pain Coping Inventory-2 in patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain.","authors":"Richard Thompson, Maria Fors, Jessica Andrée, Ann-Sofi Kammerlind, Kajsa Johansson","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the two subscales of a Swedish version of the Brief Pain Coping Inventory-2 (BPCI-2:SWE) in a population of patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain (MSKP). The BPCI-2 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) originally developed to measure traditional pain management strategies (TPMS) and psychological flexibility (PF) in populations with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed guidance from the \"COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments-group\" and the stages described by Beaton. The BPCI-2 was translated and cross-culturally adapted from English to Swedish. The BPCI-2:SWE's content validity was evaluated using the face-validity index and qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews in a cohort of 13 patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for MSKP. The BPCI-2:SWE's construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, reliability, and measurement error were evaluated using a test-retest design in a cohort of 124 patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for MSKP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BPCI-2:SWE had excellent content validity, but patients' experiences indicated that the scoring method may benefit from amendment. The PF subscale demonstrated good construct validity on hypothesis testing. However, the TPMS subscale did not reach the <i>a priori</i> threshold for good construct validity, correlating positively with pain intensity and demonstrating low correlation with all other PROMs. Neither subscale demonstrated floor or ceiling effects. The PF subscale had moderate, and the TPMS subscale had good, test-retest reliability. Measurement error was relatively high for both subscales at the individual patient level but low at the group level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BPCI-2:SWE is comprehensible and relevant within a Swedish primary care context. The BPCI-2:SWE demonstrated adequate measurement properties for use as an outcome measure in research studies, but future research should further evaluate the BPCI-2:SWE's reliability, responsiveness, and prognostic utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the two subscales of a Swedish version of the Brief Pain Coping Inventory-2 (BPCI-2:SWE) in a population of patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain (MSKP). The BPCI-2 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) originally developed to measure traditional pain management strategies (TPMS) and psychological flexibility (PF) in populations with chronic pain.

Methods: This study followed guidance from the "COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments-group" and the stages described by Beaton. The BPCI-2 was translated and cross-culturally adapted from English to Swedish. The BPCI-2:SWE's content validity was evaluated using the face-validity index and qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews in a cohort of 13 patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for MSKP. The BPCI-2:SWE's construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, reliability, and measurement error were evaluated using a test-retest design in a cohort of 124 patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for MSKP.

Results: The BPCI-2:SWE had excellent content validity, but patients' experiences indicated that the scoring method may benefit from amendment. The PF subscale demonstrated good construct validity on hypothesis testing. However, the TPMS subscale did not reach the a priori threshold for good construct validity, correlating positively with pain intensity and demonstrating low correlation with all other PROMs. Neither subscale demonstrated floor or ceiling effects. The PF subscale had moderate, and the TPMS subscale had good, test-retest reliability. Measurement error was relatively high for both subscales at the individual patient level but low at the group level.

Conclusions: The BPCI-2:SWE is comprehensible and relevant within a Swedish primary care context. The BPCI-2:SWE demonstrated adequate measurement properties for use as an outcome measure in research studies, but future research should further evaluate the BPCI-2:SWE's reliability, responsiveness, and prognostic utility.

瑞典简短疼痛应对量表-2在寻求初级保健物理治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者中的测量特性。
目的:本研究旨在评估瑞典版简短疼痛应对量表-2 (BPCI-2:SWE)的两个子量表在寻求肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSKP)初级保健物理治疗的患者群体中的效度和可靠性。BPCI-2是一种患者报告的结果测量(PROM),最初用于测量慢性疼痛人群的传统疼痛管理策略(TPMS)和心理灵活性(PF)。方法:本研究遵循“基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准-组”和Beaton描述的阶段。BPCI-2被翻译并跨文化地从英语改编为瑞典语。采用面部效度指数和半结构化访谈的定性内容分析对13例寻求初级保健物理治疗的MSKP患者进行BPCI-2:SWE的内容效度进行评估。BPCI-2:SWE的结构效度、下限和上限效应、信度和测量误差在124名寻求初级保健物理治疗的MSKP患者队列中使用重测设计进行评估。结果:BPCI-2:SWE具有优秀的内容效度,但患者的经验表明,该评分方法可能会受益于修改。经假设检验,该量表具有较好的构念效度。然而,TPMS子量表未达到良好结构效度的先验阈值,与疼痛强度呈正相关,与所有其他PROMs的相关性较低。两个分量表都没有显示出下限或上限效应。PF量表具有中等信度,TPMS量表具有良好的重测信度。两个亚量表在个体患者水平上的测量误差相对较高,但在群体水平上的测量误差较低。结论:BPCI-2:SWE在瑞典初级保健背景下是可理解和相关的。BPCI-2:SWE在研究中表现出足够的测量特性,可作为结果测量,但未来的研究应进一步评估BPCI-2:SWE的可靠性、响应性和预后效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信