Nursing Students' Satisfaction and Self-Confidence After Short-Term Clinical Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Asim Abdullah Alhejaili, Bassam Alshahrani, Abdulrahman Muslihi, Paul Reinald Base Garcia, Mark Yuga Roque, Rawan Saud Alharbi, Hammad Ali Fadlalmola
{"title":"Nursing Students' Satisfaction and Self-Confidence After Short-Term Clinical Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Asim Abdullah Alhejaili, Bassam Alshahrani, Abdulrahman Muslihi, Paul Reinald Base Garcia, Mark Yuga Roque, Rawan Saud Alharbi, Hammad Ali Fadlalmola","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The transition from theoretical knowledge to clinical practice poses significant challenges for nursing students globally. This critical period requires comprehensive educational support to build confidence and competence. While short-term preparatory courses have shown promise internationally, their effectiveness within the Saudi Arabian context remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate nursing students' satisfaction and self-confidence following participation in short-term preparatory courses conducted before clinical placements at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from February to April 2025. Data were collected from 117 undergraduate nursing students (response rate: 80.7%) using a validated questionnaire adapted from the National League for Nursing's Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning instrument. The preparatory courses included nursing care plan development, hospital orientation, and infection control procedures delivered over two weeks. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis. <b>Results:</b> Students reported high levels of satisfaction (mean = 4.29 ± 0.92) and self-confidence (mean = 4.31 ± 0.81) scores. The highest satisfaction was with instructor effectiveness (mean = 4.31 ± 1.05) and teaching methods (mean = 4.32 ± 1.01). Students demonstrated strong confidence in personal learning responsibility (mean = 4.44 ± 0.88) and skill development (mean = 4.32 ± 0.95). A strong positive correlation existed between satisfaction and self-confidence (r = 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Short-term preparatory courses effectively enhanced nursing students' satisfaction and self-confidence in the Saudi Arabian context. The strong correlation between these constructions suggests that educational interventions improving one dimension is likely to benefit the other. These findings support integrating structured preparatory programs into nursing curricula to facilitate successful clinical transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The transition from theoretical knowledge to clinical practice poses significant challenges for nursing students globally. This critical period requires comprehensive educational support to build confidence and competence. While short-term preparatory courses have shown promise internationally, their effectiveness within the Saudi Arabian context remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate nursing students' satisfaction and self-confidence following participation in short-term preparatory courses conducted before clinical placements at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from February to April 2025. Data were collected from 117 undergraduate nursing students (response rate: 80.7%) using a validated questionnaire adapted from the National League for Nursing's Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning instrument. The preparatory courses included nursing care plan development, hospital orientation, and infection control procedures delivered over two weeks. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: Students reported high levels of satisfaction (mean = 4.29 ± 0.92) and self-confidence (mean = 4.31 ± 0.81) scores. The highest satisfaction was with instructor effectiveness (mean = 4.31 ± 1.05) and teaching methods (mean = 4.32 ± 1.01). Students demonstrated strong confidence in personal learning responsibility (mean = 4.44 ± 0.88) and skill development (mean = 4.32 ± 0.95). A strong positive correlation existed between satisfaction and self-confidence (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Short-term preparatory courses effectively enhanced nursing students' satisfaction and self-confidence in the Saudi Arabian context. The strong correlation between these constructions suggests that educational interventions improving one dimension is likely to benefit the other. These findings support integrating structured preparatory programs into nursing curricula to facilitate successful clinical transitions.

护生短期临床准备后满意度与自信心的横断面研究。
背景/目的:从理论知识到临床实践的转变对全球护理专业学生提出了重大挑战。这一关键时期需要全面的教育支持,以建立信心和能力。虽然短期预备课程在国际上显示出希望,但其在沙特阿拉伯范围内的有效性仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估护生在沙特Taibah大学临床实习前参加短期预备课程后的满意度和自信心。方法:于2025年2月至4月进行描述性横断面研究。采用全国护理学联盟学生学习满意度与自信心调查问卷,对117名护理本科学生进行问卷调查,问卷回复率为80.7%。预备课程包括护理计划制定、医院介绍和感染控制程序,为期两周。统计分析包括描述性统计和Pearson相关分析。结果:学生满意度(平均= 4.29±0.92)和自信心(平均= 4.31±0.81)得分较高。满意度最高的是教师效能(平均= 4.31±1.05)和教学方法(平均= 4.32±1.01)。学生对个人学习责任(平均= 4.44±0.88)和技能发展(平均= 4.32±0.95)表现出较强的信心。满意度与自信心呈显著正相关(r = 0.79, p < 0.001)。结论:短期预科课程能有效提高沙特背景下护生的满意度和自信心。这些结构之间的强相关性表明,改善一个维度的教育干预可能会使另一个维度受益。这些发现支持将结构化的预备课程纳入护理课程,以促进成功的临床过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信