Validation of the Adapted eHEALS Questionnaire for Assessing Digital Health Literacy in Social Media: A Pilot Study.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Lucía Carton Erlandsson, Anna Bocchino, José Luis Palazón-Fernandez, Isabel Lepiani, Elena Chamorro Rebollo, Raúl Quintana Alonso
{"title":"Validation of the Adapted eHEALS Questionnaire for Assessing Digital Health Literacy in Social Media: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Lucía Carton Erlandsson, Anna Bocchino, José Luis Palazón-Fernandez, Isabel Lepiani, Elena Chamorro Rebollo, Raúl Quintana Alonso","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital health literacy is crucial for navigating social media as a primary health information source. However, its interactive and unregulated nature fosters misinformation, requiring critical evaluation skills. Existing tools assess general internet use, but no validated instrument measures competencies specific to social media. This study aimed to adapt and validate the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) for this context. <b>Methods</b>: A content validation process was conducted with 33 experts, who evaluated the clarity, coherence, and relevance of the adapted questionnaire using item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI) content validity indices. A pilot study was then carried out with 250 participants to assess the instrument's reliability and feasibility, measured through Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. <b>Results</b>: The adapted eHEALS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI > 0.90) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92; McDonald's Ω = 0.92). The tool effectively captures key competencies for evaluating and applying health information in social media contexts, with exploratory factor analysis confirming a unidimensional structure that explained over 60% of the variance, supporting its robustness for use in population-based studies. <b>Conclusions</b>: This validated instrument provides a reliable method for assessing digital health literacy in social media, supporting the development of educational interventions to enhance critical appraisal skills and mitigate the impact of misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital health literacy is crucial for navigating social media as a primary health information source. However, its interactive and unregulated nature fosters misinformation, requiring critical evaluation skills. Existing tools assess general internet use, but no validated instrument measures competencies specific to social media. This study aimed to adapt and validate the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) for this context. Methods: A content validation process was conducted with 33 experts, who evaluated the clarity, coherence, and relevance of the adapted questionnaire using item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI) content validity indices. A pilot study was then carried out with 250 participants to assess the instrument's reliability and feasibility, measured through Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. Results: The adapted eHEALS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI > 0.90) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92; McDonald's Ω = 0.92). The tool effectively captures key competencies for evaluating and applying health information in social media contexts, with exploratory factor analysis confirming a unidimensional structure that explained over 60% of the variance, supporting its robustness for use in population-based studies. Conclusions: This validated instrument provides a reliable method for assessing digital health literacy in social media, supporting the development of educational interventions to enhance critical appraisal skills and mitigate the impact of misinformation.

社会媒体中评估数字健康素养的适应性eheal问卷的验证:一项试点研究。
背景:数字卫生素养对于将社交媒体作为主要卫生信息来源至关重要。然而,它的互动性和不受监管的性质助长了错误信息,需要批判性的评估技能。现有工具评估一般的互联网使用情况,但没有经过验证的工具衡量特定于社交媒体的能力。本研究旨在针对这一背景调整和验证电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)。方法:对33名专家进行内容验证,采用项目级(I-CVI)和量表级(S-CVI)内容效度指标对改编问卷的清晰度、连贯性和相关性进行评估。然后进行了一项有250名参与者的试点研究,通过Cronbach's alpha和McDonald's Omega来评估仪器的可靠性和可行性。结果:改编后的eHEALS具有良好的内容效度(S-CVI > 0.90)和较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.92; McDonald’s Ω = 0.92)。该工具有效地捕获了在社交媒体背景下评估和应用健康信息的关键能力,探索性因素分析证实了一维结构,可以解释60%以上的差异,支持其在基于人群的研究中使用的稳健性。结论:这一经过验证的工具为评估社交媒体中的数字健康素养提供了一种可靠的方法,支持制定教育干预措施,以提高关键评估技能并减轻错误信息的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信