Khin Chan Myae Win, Huaqiong Zhou, Vicki Patton, Mary Steen, Phillip Della
{"title":"Factors Contributing to Non-Adherence to Treatment Among Adult Patients with Long-Term Haemodialysis: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Khin Chan Myae Win, Huaqiong Zhou, Vicki Patton, Mary Steen, Phillip Della","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adherence of renal patients to a prescribed therapeutic regimen is crucial for the success of haemodialysis and the decreased mortality rates of patients; however, 60% are non-adherent to dialysis, fluid, and dietary allowances. To identify promising interventions aimed at improving treatment adherence, this review aimed to collate research evidence on the prevalence of non-adherence to treatment (fluid, diet, and routine haemodialysis) and to synthesise the factors contributing to non-adherence in long-term haemodialysis patients. <b>Methods:</b> An integrative review was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework (2005). ProQuest, CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched, using the keywords 'haemodialysis' and 'non-adherence'. The review included peer-reviewed quantitative studies published in English from 1 August 2018 to 30 June 2025, focusing on adults over 18 undergoing haemodialysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the quality of the studies. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-nine studies were included, identifying factors across four treatment groups: non-adherence to fluid allowance, dietary allowance, haemodialysis session, and fluid/diet/haemodialysis. These factors were grouped into three themes: social demographics, clinical factors, self-management, and perceptions. Commonly cited factors included age, gender, educational status, health literacy, and perception. <b>Conclusions:</b> This review highlights the complex factors influencing treatment non-adherence, which may vary based on the variables and measurement tools used in each study. Low-level health literacy is the most frequently cited modifiable factor. Therefore, prioritising effective patient education that enhances knowledge and understanding of the importance of adhering to treatment is key to improving compliance in long-term haemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adherence of renal patients to a prescribed therapeutic regimen is crucial for the success of haemodialysis and the decreased mortality rates of patients; however, 60% are non-adherent to dialysis, fluid, and dietary allowances. To identify promising interventions aimed at improving treatment adherence, this review aimed to collate research evidence on the prevalence of non-adherence to treatment (fluid, diet, and routine haemodialysis) and to synthesise the factors contributing to non-adherence in long-term haemodialysis patients. Methods: An integrative review was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework (2005). ProQuest, CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched, using the keywords 'haemodialysis' and 'non-adherence'. The review included peer-reviewed quantitative studies published in English from 1 August 2018 to 30 June 2025, focusing on adults over 18 undergoing haemodialysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the quality of the studies. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included, identifying factors across four treatment groups: non-adherence to fluid allowance, dietary allowance, haemodialysis session, and fluid/diet/haemodialysis. These factors were grouped into three themes: social demographics, clinical factors, self-management, and perceptions. Commonly cited factors included age, gender, educational status, health literacy, and perception. Conclusions: This review highlights the complex factors influencing treatment non-adherence, which may vary based on the variables and measurement tools used in each study. Low-level health literacy is the most frequently cited modifiable factor. Therefore, prioritising effective patient education that enhances knowledge and understanding of the importance of adhering to treatment is key to improving compliance in long-term haemodialysis patients.
背景:肾病患者遵守规定的治疗方案是血液透析成功和降低患者死亡率的关键;然而,60%的患者不坚持透析、补液和饮食。为了确定改善治疗依从性的有希望的干预措施,本综述旨在整理关于治疗不依从(液体、饮食和常规血液透析)患病率的研究证据,并综合导致长期血液透析患者不依从的因素。方法:采用Whittemore和Knafl的五阶段框架(2005)进行综合评价。使用关键词“血液透析”和“不依不从”,对ProQuest、CINAHL、PubMed和Web of Science进行了搜索。该综述包括2018年8月1日至2025年6月30日以英文发表的同行评议定量研究,重点关注18岁以上接受血液透析的成年人。乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)关键评估清单用于评估研究的质量。结果:纳入了29项研究,确定了四个治疗组的因素:不遵守液体补给量、饮食补给量、血液透析时间和液体/饮食/血液透析。这些因素被分为三个主题:社会人口统计、临床因素、自我管理和认知。常被引用的因素包括年龄、性别、教育程度、健康素养和认知。结论:本综述强调了影响治疗不依从性的复杂因素,这些因素可能因每项研究中使用的变量和测量工具而异。卫生知识水平低是最常被提及的可改变因素。因此,优先考虑有效的患者教育,提高对坚持治疗重要性的认识和理解,是提高长期血液透析患者依从性的关键。
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.