Force in robotic thoracic surgery -a one year analysis of DaVinci 5 force feedback.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Peter J Kneuertz, Robert Mostellar, Robert E Merritt, Elliot L Servais, Brian Mitzman, Nestor R Villamizar, Luis F Tapias, John F Lazar, Desmond M D'Souza, Daniel S Oh, Gretchen P Jackson
{"title":"Force in robotic thoracic surgery -a one year analysis of DaVinci 5 force feedback.","authors":"Peter J Kneuertz, Robert Mostellar, Robert E Merritt, Elliot L Servais, Brian Mitzman, Nestor R Villamizar, Luis F Tapias, John F Lazar, Desmond M D'Souza, Daniel S Oh, Gretchen P Jackson","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02781-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lack of tactile sensation has been a limitation of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). The da Vinci 5 System (launched in 2024) integrates force feedback (FFB), a technology that measures instrument-tip forces and relays them to console hand controllers. This study characterizes forces applied during RATS and evaluates the impact of FFB. Da Vinci 5 system data for all RATS procedures using FFB instruments performed in the US between March 29, 2024 and April 30, 2025 were reviewed. Common thoracic surgeries were analyzed, including lung resections, mediastinal, esophageal, and diaphragmatic procedures. Mean instrument-tip forces (Newtons, N) were compared by procedure and instrument type. Forces and time spent above > 6.5 N were compared across FFB settings. Data from 444 procedures by 73 unique surgeons were analyzed. Median forces during lung resections (1.45 N anatomic resection, 1.42 N wedge) were significantly lower compared to mediastinal procedures (1.61 N), esophageal (1.74 N), and diaphragm surgery (1.59 N) (p < 0.001). Higher forces were measured with the use of retraction (Cadiere or Fenestrated Bipolar) than dissecting (Maryland) instruments (p < 0.001). Median forces decreased progressively with higher FFB settings (off, 1.79 N vs. low, 1.67 N vs. medium, 1.45 N vs. high, 1.32 N, p < 0.001). Proportion of duration at force > 6.5 N similarly declined with increased FFB setting (p < 0.001). FFB technology is associated with reduced average and peak instrument forces during RATS, particularly at medium and high settings. Retraction instruments experienced the highest forces. Further research is needed to define optimal force thresholds and clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"632"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02781-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lack of tactile sensation has been a limitation of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). The da Vinci 5 System (launched in 2024) integrates force feedback (FFB), a technology that measures instrument-tip forces and relays them to console hand controllers. This study characterizes forces applied during RATS and evaluates the impact of FFB. Da Vinci 5 system data for all RATS procedures using FFB instruments performed in the US between March 29, 2024 and April 30, 2025 were reviewed. Common thoracic surgeries were analyzed, including lung resections, mediastinal, esophageal, and diaphragmatic procedures. Mean instrument-tip forces (Newtons, N) were compared by procedure and instrument type. Forces and time spent above > 6.5 N were compared across FFB settings. Data from 444 procedures by 73 unique surgeons were analyzed. Median forces during lung resections (1.45 N anatomic resection, 1.42 N wedge) were significantly lower compared to mediastinal procedures (1.61 N), esophageal (1.74 N), and diaphragm surgery (1.59 N) (p < 0.001). Higher forces were measured with the use of retraction (Cadiere or Fenestrated Bipolar) than dissecting (Maryland) instruments (p < 0.001). Median forces decreased progressively with higher FFB settings (off, 1.79 N vs. low, 1.67 N vs. medium, 1.45 N vs. high, 1.32 N, p < 0.001). Proportion of duration at force > 6.5 N similarly declined with increased FFB setting (p < 0.001). FFB technology is associated with reduced average and peak instrument forces during RATS, particularly at medium and high settings. Retraction instruments experienced the highest forces. Further research is needed to define optimal force thresholds and clinical impact.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人胸外科手术中的力——达芬奇5力反馈的一年分析。
缺乏触觉一直是机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)的局限性。达芬奇5号系统(2024年推出)集成了力反馈(FFB),这是一种测量仪器尖端力并将其传递给控制台手动控制器的技术。本研究表征了rat过程中施加的力,并评估了FFB的影响。回顾了2024年3月29日至2025年4月30日在美国使用FFB仪器进行的所有RATS手术的Da Vinci 5系统数据。我们分析了常见的胸外科手术,包括肺切除术、纵隔手术、食管手术和膈手术。按程序和仪器类型比较平均仪器尖端力(牛顿,N)。在不同的FFB设置中比较在> - 6.5 N以上的力和时间。分析了73位独特外科医生的444例手术数据。与纵隔手术(1.61 N)、食管手术(1.74 N)和横膈膜手术(1.59 N) (p 6.5 N)相比,肺切除术(1.45 N解剖切除,1.42 N楔形切除)的中位力显著降低(p 6.5 N)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信