Driving Innovation: The Impact of National Health Policies on Optometry Research in East Asia.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jihye Ahn, Moonsung Choi
{"title":"Driving Innovation: The Impact of National Health Policies on Optometry Research in East Asia.","authors":"Jihye Ahn, Moonsung Choi","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the optometric research landscape in three East Asian countries-China, Japan, and Korea-analysing how research trends align with each country's national health strategies. By evaluating published articles and reviews from national journals between 2006 March 2025, we identify key areas of focus, including paediatric optometry, refractive errors, and advanced diagnostic techniques. China's research emphasises pathogenesis and retinal diseases, driven by its aging population and high prevalence of chronic conditions, while Japan prioritises binocular vision and professional practice across all age groups. Korea focuses on accommodation, contact lenses, and the impact of digital technology on vision, reflecting its high prevalence of myopia among children. These variations are shaped by demographic trends and public health strategies. China's targeted health policy, the \"China Five-Year National Plan for Eye Health 2016-2020,\" has directly influenced domestic research, particularly in artificial intelligence and diagnostics. In contrast, Japan's \"Vision Health Care 2035\" and Korea's \"National Health Plan 2030\" have had a more limited effect on shaping optometry research, with trends driven more by societal needs-such as Japan's aging population and Korea's focus on children's digital device use. The findings highlight how China's policy-driven approach directly influences research priorities, while in Japan and Korea, research responds more to demographic shifts. This comparative analysis underscores the importance of targeted national policies in advancing healthcare innovation and shaping research directions in optometry. This study offers actionable insight into how targeted health policies, demographic transitions, and clinical practice models shape national optometric research agendas, providing a framework for aligning future research with healthcare goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the optometric research landscape in three East Asian countries-China, Japan, and Korea-analysing how research trends align with each country's national health strategies. By evaluating published articles and reviews from national journals between 2006 March 2025, we identify key areas of focus, including paediatric optometry, refractive errors, and advanced diagnostic techniques. China's research emphasises pathogenesis and retinal diseases, driven by its aging population and high prevalence of chronic conditions, while Japan prioritises binocular vision and professional practice across all age groups. Korea focuses on accommodation, contact lenses, and the impact of digital technology on vision, reflecting its high prevalence of myopia among children. These variations are shaped by demographic trends and public health strategies. China's targeted health policy, the "China Five-Year National Plan for Eye Health 2016-2020," has directly influenced domestic research, particularly in artificial intelligence and diagnostics. In contrast, Japan's "Vision Health Care 2035" and Korea's "National Health Plan 2030" have had a more limited effect on shaping optometry research, with trends driven more by societal needs-such as Japan's aging population and Korea's focus on children's digital device use. The findings highlight how China's policy-driven approach directly influences research priorities, while in Japan and Korea, research responds more to demographic shifts. This comparative analysis underscores the importance of targeted national policies in advancing healthcare innovation and shaping research directions in optometry. This study offers actionable insight into how targeted health policies, demographic transitions, and clinical practice models shape national optometric research agendas, providing a framework for aligning future research with healthcare goals.

推动创新:东亚国家卫生政策对验光研究的影响。
本研究考察了三个东亚国家(中国、日本和韩国)的验光研究现状,分析了研究趋势如何与每个国家的国家卫生战略相一致。通过评估2006年3月至2025年国家期刊上发表的文章和评论,我们确定了重点领域,包括儿科验光、屈光不正和先进的诊断技术。由于人口老龄化和慢性病的高患病率,中国的研究重点是发病机制和视网膜疾病,而日本的研究重点是双眼视力和所有年龄组的专业实践。韩国主要关注住宿、隐形眼镜、数字技术对视力的影响,这反映了韩国儿童近视率很高。这些变化受到人口趋势和公共卫生战略的影响。中国有针对性的卫生政策《中国眼科健康五年规划(2016-2020)》直接影响了国内的研究,尤其是人工智能和诊断领域的研究。相比之下,日本的“视力保健2035”和韩国的“国家健康计划2030”对塑造验光研究的影响更为有限,趋势更多地受到社会需求的推动,例如日本的人口老龄化和韩国对儿童数字设备使用的关注。研究结果强调了中国政策驱动的方法如何直接影响研究重点,而在日本和韩国,研究更多地响应人口变化。这种比较分析强调了有针对性的国家政策在推进医疗保健创新和塑造验光研究方向的重要性。这项研究为有针对性的卫生政策、人口结构转变和临床实践模型如何塑造国家验光研究议程提供了可行的见解,为使未来的研究与医疗保健目标保持一致提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信