Blood Utilization and Waste Following Implementation of Thromboelastography.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Kaitlyn M Shelton, LeeAnn P Walker, Carol A Carman, Daniel González, Sarah Burnett-Greenup
{"title":"Blood Utilization and Waste Following Implementation of Thromboelastography.","authors":"Kaitlyn M Shelton, LeeAnn P Walker, Carol A Carman, Daniel González, Sarah Burnett-Greenup","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thromboelastography (TEG) is a viscoelastic testing platform that monitors real-time coagulation. This study evaluated changes in blood use and waste following TEG implementation, as well as changes in massive transfusion protocol (MTP) blood utilization and returns following TEG implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is a retrospective analysis of blood component transfusion in 3 services (cardiothoracic surgery, emergency department, and trauma surgery) and overall blood waste at a level II trauma center for 104 weeks before and after TEG implementation. Blood utilization and waste were compared by a paired t-test. Additionally, MTP blood utilization and returns were compared for 80 cases pre-TEG and 80 cases post-TEG implementation by an independent t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in weekly mean utilization after implementation of TEG differed among component types. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions increased by 15% (P < 0.01), while plasma transfusions decreased by 26% (P < 0.05). The mean RBC units wasted decreased (P < 0.01), but the mean plasma units wasted increased significantly between the pre- and post-TEG groups (P < 0.001). The weekly mean platelet and cryoprecipitate waste and utilization showed no significant difference between the pre- and post-TEG groups. MTP utilization and returns showed no significant difference between pre- and post-TEG implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In line with previous literature, plasma utilization decreased post-TEG implementation. Plasma waste unexpectedly increased, which may be due to an increase of orders for plasma that were not transfused. RBC utilization and waste showed significant changes, although the impact of blood availability during the COVID pandemic should be considered a confounding variable in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thromboelastography (TEG) is a viscoelastic testing platform that monitors real-time coagulation. This study evaluated changes in blood use and waste following TEG implementation, as well as changes in massive transfusion protocol (MTP) blood utilization and returns following TEG implementation.

Methods: The study is a retrospective analysis of blood component transfusion in 3 services (cardiothoracic surgery, emergency department, and trauma surgery) and overall blood waste at a level II trauma center for 104 weeks before and after TEG implementation. Blood utilization and waste were compared by a paired t-test. Additionally, MTP blood utilization and returns were compared for 80 cases pre-TEG and 80 cases post-TEG implementation by an independent t-test.

Results: Changes in weekly mean utilization after implementation of TEG differed among component types. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions increased by 15% (P < 0.01), while plasma transfusions decreased by 26% (P < 0.05). The mean RBC units wasted decreased (P < 0.01), but the mean plasma units wasted increased significantly between the pre- and post-TEG groups (P < 0.001). The weekly mean platelet and cryoprecipitate waste and utilization showed no significant difference between the pre- and post-TEG groups. MTP utilization and returns showed no significant difference between pre- and post-TEG implementation.

Conclusions: In line with previous literature, plasma utilization decreased post-TEG implementation. Plasma waste unexpectedly increased, which may be due to an increase of orders for plasma that were not transfused. RBC utilization and waste showed significant changes, although the impact of blood availability during the COVID pandemic should be considered a confounding variable in this study.

血栓弹性成像后的血液利用和浪费。
背景:血栓弹性成像(TEG)是一种监测实时凝血的粘弹性测试平台。本研究评估了TEG实施后血液使用和浪费的变化,以及TEG实施后大规模输血方案(MTP)血液利用和回报的变化。方法:回顾性分析某二级创伤中心实施TEG前后104周的3个科室(心胸外科、急诊科和创伤外科)的血液成分输血情况和总体血液浪费情况。采用配对t检验比较血液利用率和浪费。此外,通过独立t检验比较80例teg实施前和80例teg实施后的MTP血液利用率和回报。结果:TEG实施后周平均利用率的变化在不同成分类型之间存在差异。红细胞(RBC)输注量增加15% (P < 0.01),血浆输注量减少26% (P < 0.05)。平均浪费的红细胞单位减少(P < 0.01),但平均浪费的血浆单位在teg前后组之间显著增加(P < 0.001)。teg治疗前后血小板和低温沉淀的周平均浪费和利用率无显著差异。在实施teg前后,MTP的利用率和收益没有显著差异。结论:与先前的文献一致,teg实施后血浆利用率下降。血浆浪费意外增加,这可能是由于未输血血浆订单增加所致。尽管在本研究中应将COVID大流行期间血液供应的影响视为一个混杂变量,但RBC利用率和浪费表现出显着变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信