Steven J Rose, Aisaku Nakamura, Md Monir Hossain, Theresa W Guilbert, Rachelle R Ramsey
{"title":"Real world adherence to biologic therapy for severe asthma in children.","authors":"Steven J Rose, Aisaku Nakamura, Md Monir Hossain, Theresa W Guilbert, Rachelle R Ramsey","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic medications improve asthma symptoms, spirometry, and exacerbation rates in patients with severe asthma. However, little is known about adherence to biologic medications in children.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe adherence to biologic medications in pediatric asthma and evaluate cofactors and outcomes related to adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed of patients at a single medical center with severe asthma to calculate adherence during the first year on biologic therapy. The relationship of adherence with method of administration (i.e. home nursing, clinic, or independent), medication dosing frequency, and insurance was examined using multiple regression models. The effect of biologic therapy on asthma outcomes was analyzed using generalized linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients demonstrated 84% adherence to biologic therapies during the first 6 months of therapy (SD = 19, n=186) and 76% over 12 months (SD = 23, n=155). Method of administration, insurance type, and dosing frequency impacted adherence. Outcomes improved on biologic therapy such that asthma exacerbations decreased by 0.8 (SD=1.9) exacerbations per year, FVC z score improved by 0.26 (SD=0.7), and FEV1 z score improved by 0.3 (SD = 0.8). Decreased exacerbations rates and increased FVC and FEV1 were associated with adherence to therapy over the first 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with severe asthma demonstrated higher rates of adherence to asthma biologic medications than has been demonstrated for inhaled corticosteroids. Biologic therapies were associated with decreased asthma exacerbations and improved spirometry, and these changes were associated with adherence. Medication administration strategy, insurance type, and dosing frequency impacted adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Biologic medications improve asthma symptoms, spirometry, and exacerbation rates in patients with severe asthma. However, little is known about adherence to biologic medications in children.
Objectives: To describe adherence to biologic medications in pediatric asthma and evaluate cofactors and outcomes related to adherence.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients at a single medical center with severe asthma to calculate adherence during the first year on biologic therapy. The relationship of adherence with method of administration (i.e. home nursing, clinic, or independent), medication dosing frequency, and insurance was examined using multiple regression models. The effect of biologic therapy on asthma outcomes was analyzed using generalized linear regression models.
Results: Patients demonstrated 84% adherence to biologic therapies during the first 6 months of therapy (SD = 19, n=186) and 76% over 12 months (SD = 23, n=155). Method of administration, insurance type, and dosing frequency impacted adherence. Outcomes improved on biologic therapy such that asthma exacerbations decreased by 0.8 (SD=1.9) exacerbations per year, FVC z score improved by 0.26 (SD=0.7), and FEV1 z score improved by 0.3 (SD = 0.8). Decreased exacerbations rates and increased FVC and FEV1 were associated with adherence to therapy over the first 12 months.
Conclusions: Patients with severe asthma demonstrated higher rates of adherence to asthma biologic medications than has been demonstrated for inhaled corticosteroids. Biologic therapies were associated with decreased asthma exacerbations and improved spirometry, and these changes were associated with adherence. Medication administration strategy, insurance type, and dosing frequency impacted adherence.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.