Gamification Strategies in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Protocol.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Raffaele Antonio Elia, Maria Colangelo, Valentina Cerrone, Donato Pace, Vincenzo Andretta
{"title":"Gamification Strategies in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Protocol.","authors":"Raffaele Antonio Elia, Maria Colangelo, Valentina Cerrone, Donato Pace, Vincenzo Andretta","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> In recent years, the use of gamification has been growing in health education. In undergraduate nursing programs, it aims to enhance motivation, engagement, knowledge retention, and professional competencies. However, the evidence often combining nursing students with other disciplines or focusing on specific tools rather than the broader concept. This systematic review will synthesize the impact of gamification strategies on educational outcomes in undergraduate nursing education. <b>Methods:</b> This protocol was written according to PRISMA-P guidelines and is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251117719). Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and observational designs involving undergraduate nursing students exposed to gamification interventions in classroom, online, or clinical training settings. Comparators may include traditional lecture-based instruction or other non-gamified methods. We will search the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, covering January 2010 to July 2025, without language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data, and assess risk of bias using Cochrane RoB-2, ROBINS-I, and JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Where possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted; otherwise, findings will be synthesized narratively. <b>Results:</b> Not applicable; this is a protocol. Findings will be synthesized as specified in the Methods. <b>Conclusions:</b> This review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of gamification's effectiveness in undergraduate nursing education, identifying the most effective strategies and the contexts in which they perform best.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In recent years, the use of gamification has been growing in health education. In undergraduate nursing programs, it aims to enhance motivation, engagement, knowledge retention, and professional competencies. However, the evidence often combining nursing students with other disciplines or focusing on specific tools rather than the broader concept. This systematic review will synthesize the impact of gamification strategies on educational outcomes in undergraduate nursing education. Methods: This protocol was written according to PRISMA-P guidelines and is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251117719). Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and observational designs involving undergraduate nursing students exposed to gamification interventions in classroom, online, or clinical training settings. Comparators may include traditional lecture-based instruction or other non-gamified methods. We will search the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, covering January 2010 to July 2025, without language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data, and assess risk of bias using Cochrane RoB-2, ROBINS-I, and JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Where possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted; otherwise, findings will be synthesized narratively. Results: Not applicable; this is a protocol. Findings will be synthesized as specified in the Methods. Conclusions: This review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of gamification's effectiveness in undergraduate nursing education, identifying the most effective strategies and the contexts in which they perform best.

本科护理教育中的游戏化策略:一项系统评价方案。
背景/目的:近年来,游戏化在健康教育中的应用越来越多。在本科护理课程中,它旨在提高动机,参与,知识保留和专业能力。然而,证据往往将护理专业的学生与其他学科结合起来,或者专注于特定的工具,而不是更广泛的概念。本系统综述将综合游戏化策略对本科护理教育成果的影响。方法:本方案按照PRISMA-P指南编写,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251117719)。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、准实验和观察性设计,涉及在课堂、在线或临床培训环境中接受游戏化干预的本科护理学生。比较对象可能包括传统的基于讲座的教学或其他非游戏化的方法。我们将搜索PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus和谷歌Scholar数据库,涵盖2010年1月至2025年7月,没有语言限制。两名审稿人将独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用Cochrane rob2、ROBINS-I和JBI关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。如有可能,将进行荟萃分析;否则,调查结果将以叙述的方式综合。结果:不适用;这是一个协议。研究结果将按照方法的规定进行综合。结论:本综述将全面综合游戏化在本科护理教育中的有效性,确定最有效的策略和它们表现最佳的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信