Determinants of successful smoking cessation in outpatient settings: A comparative analysis of varenicline and free program interventions.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/208449
Yaohong He, Jin Chen, Lihua Zhao, Shuang Qu
{"title":"Determinants of successful smoking cessation in outpatient settings: A comparative analysis of varenicline and free program interventions.","authors":"Yaohong He, Jin Chen, Lihua Zhao, Shuang Qu","doi":"10.18332/tid/208449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking cessation is a significant challenge, and various factors influence the success rates. Understanding the factors affecting cessation outcomes can guide more effective intervention strategies. This study compares the efficacy of a general outpatient cessation program versus a free cessation program, with subgroup analyses based on medication type (bupropion vs varenicline), aiming to identify factors associated with successful smoking cessation in outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 356 patients visiting our smoking cessation clinic between January 2018 and June 2022, with random allocation into two groups via computerized random number table upon enrollment: Group A (general outpatient intervention, n=188) and Group B (free cessation program, n=168). Both groups were further subdivided based on the use of bupropion (A1, B1) or varenicline (A2, B2). Factors such as demographic data, nicotine dependence, smoking cessation confidence, exhaled carbon monoxide, and smoking cessation success (7-day point prevalence abstinence rate [PPAR] and 3-month continuous quitting rate [CQR]) were analyzed. To ensure comprehensive results, we performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, including participants who dropped out or did not complete the study as failures in the smoking cessation outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups A and B in demographics, smoking behavior, or medication, except for occupation and duration of cigarette smoking. Group B had lower nicotine dependence but comparable smoking cessation outcomes to Group A. Factors associated with successful cessation included being older, married, employed full-time, smoking ≤20 cigarettes/day, and using varenicline. The CQR of Group A2 was 9.36% higher than that of Group A1. The PPAR and CQR of Group B2 were 16.66% and 17.93% higher than those of Group B1, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in PPAR and CQR between Group A2 and Group B2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Varenicline use, specific sociodemographic characteristics (aged >50 years, married, full-time employment), and less severe smoking behavior (≤20 cigarettes/day, ≤25 years duration, ≤600 pack-year) are key determinants of successful smoking cessation in outpatient settings. Varenicline use was associated with significantly higher cessation rates compared to bupropion within both intervention models. The free program incorporating varenicline (B2) demonstrated particularly high success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/208449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking cessation is a significant challenge, and various factors influence the success rates. Understanding the factors affecting cessation outcomes can guide more effective intervention strategies. This study compares the efficacy of a general outpatient cessation program versus a free cessation program, with subgroup analyses based on medication type (bupropion vs varenicline), aiming to identify factors associated with successful smoking cessation in outpatient settings.

Methods: We analyzed data from 356 patients visiting our smoking cessation clinic between January 2018 and June 2022, with random allocation into two groups via computerized random number table upon enrollment: Group A (general outpatient intervention, n=188) and Group B (free cessation program, n=168). Both groups were further subdivided based on the use of bupropion (A1, B1) or varenicline (A2, B2). Factors such as demographic data, nicotine dependence, smoking cessation confidence, exhaled carbon monoxide, and smoking cessation success (7-day point prevalence abstinence rate [PPAR] and 3-month continuous quitting rate [CQR]) were analyzed. To ensure comprehensive results, we performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, including participants who dropped out or did not complete the study as failures in the smoking cessation outcome.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in demographics, smoking behavior, or medication, except for occupation and duration of cigarette smoking. Group B had lower nicotine dependence but comparable smoking cessation outcomes to Group A. Factors associated with successful cessation included being older, married, employed full-time, smoking ≤20 cigarettes/day, and using varenicline. The CQR of Group A2 was 9.36% higher than that of Group A1. The PPAR and CQR of Group B2 were 16.66% and 17.93% higher than those of Group B1, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in PPAR and CQR between Group A2 and Group B2.

Conclusions: Varenicline use, specific sociodemographic characteristics (aged >50 years, married, full-time employment), and less severe smoking behavior (≤20 cigarettes/day, ≤25 years duration, ≤600 pack-year) are key determinants of successful smoking cessation in outpatient settings. Varenicline use was associated with significantly higher cessation rates compared to bupropion within both intervention models. The free program incorporating varenicline (B2) demonstrated particularly high success rates.

门诊成功戒烟的决定因素:伐尼克兰和免费项目干预的比较分析。
戒烟是一项重大挑战,各种因素影响成功率。了解影响戒烟结果的因素可以指导更有效的干预策略。本研究比较了普通门诊戒烟计划与免费戒烟计划的疗效,并基于药物类型(安非他酮与伐尼克兰)进行了亚组分析,旨在确定门诊成功戒烟的相关因素。方法:我们分析了2018年1月至2022年6月期间就诊于我们戒烟诊所的356名患者的数据,并在入组时通过计算机随机数字表随机分为两组:A组(普通门诊干预,n=188)和B组(免费戒烟计划,n=168)。两组根据使用安非他酮(A1, B1)或伐尼克兰(A2, B2)进一步细分。分析人口学资料、尼古丁依赖、戒烟信心、呼出一氧化碳、戒烟成功率(7天点流行戒断率[PPAR]和3个月连续戒烟率[CQR])等因素。为了确保全面的结果,我们进行了意向治疗(ITT)分析,包括退出或未完成研究的参与者作为戒烟结果的失败。结果:A组和B组在人口统计学、吸烟行为、用药等方面均无显著差异,除职业和吸烟持续时间外。B组的尼古丁依赖性较低,但戒烟结果与a组相当。与成功戒烟相关的因素包括年龄较大、已婚、全职工作、吸烟≤20支/天和使用伐尼克兰。A2组的CQR比A1组高9.36%。B2组的PPAR和CQR分别比B1组高16.66%和17.93%。而A2组和B2组PPAR和CQR无显著差异。结论:伐尼克兰的使用、特定的社会人口学特征(年龄50 ~ 50岁、已婚、全职工作)和较轻的吸烟行为(≤20支/天、≤25年持续时间、≤600包年)是门诊成功戒烟的关键决定因素。在两种干预模型中,与安非他酮相比,伐尼克兰的使用与显著更高的戒烟率相关。含有伐尼克兰(B2)的免费程序显示出特别高的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信