"Gun-holding" surgical posture versus conventional surgical posture in flexible ureteroscopy: a prospective randomized study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Xiaomin Gao, Chaoyue Lu, Qing Chen, Lianguo Chen, Siyu Zhuo, Jianyu Chen, Tianle Zheng, Binhao Du, Fangyi Zhang, Zhixian Yu, Wei Chen, Xiaofeng Gao, Weifang Sun, Fanggui Shao, Yeping Li
{"title":"\"Gun-holding\" surgical posture versus conventional surgical posture in flexible ureteroscopy: a prospective randomized study.","authors":"Xiaomin Gao, Chaoyue Lu, Qing Chen, Lianguo Chen, Siyu Zhuo, Jianyu Chen, Tianle Zheng, Binhao Du, Fangyi Zhang, Zhixian Yu, Wei Chen, Xiaofeng Gao, Weifang Sun, Fanggui Shao, Yeping Li","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05921-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ergonomic aspects of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) remain underexplored, despite their crucial role in minimizing musculoskeletal strain among surgeons and enhancing procedural efficiency. This study introduces a novel \"Gun-holding\" surgical posture for RIRS, aiming to improve surgeons' physical well-being and extend their operative careers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From July 2023 to June 2024, a total of 60 patients were prospectively enrolled from an initial pool of 104 and were randomized into two groups: the \"Gun-holding\" surgical posture group (Group A, n = 30) and the conventional surgical posture group (Group B, n = 30). Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, ergonomic assessments, and torque analysis for surgeons were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics and stone burden were comparable between the two groups. Torque analysis demonstrated a higher upper limb torque ratio in Group A compared to Group B. Ergonomic evaluation revealed a significant advantage for Group A (total score: 16.1 ± 4.1 vs. 22.4 ± 9.1, P = 0.001). Group A also had a significantly shorter mean hospitalization duration (1.7 ± 0.9 days vs. 2.9 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.003). Although the mean operative time for Group A was shorter (49.9 ± 26.1 min vs. 63.0 ± 40.4 min), this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.139). No significant differences were observed in initial stone-free status (SFS), 3-month SFR, postoperative Day 1 hemoglobin drop, or overall complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"Gun-holding\" surgical posture is a feasible, efficient, and safe alternative for performing RIRS, offering significant ergonomic benefits to surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05921-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ergonomic aspects of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) remain underexplored, despite their crucial role in minimizing musculoskeletal strain among surgeons and enhancing procedural efficiency. This study introduces a novel "Gun-holding" surgical posture for RIRS, aiming to improve surgeons' physical well-being and extend their operative careers.

Materials and methods: From July 2023 to June 2024, a total of 60 patients were prospectively enrolled from an initial pool of 104 and were randomized into two groups: the "Gun-holding" surgical posture group (Group A, n = 30) and the conventional surgical posture group (Group B, n = 30). Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, ergonomic assessments, and torque analysis for surgeons were analyzed.

Results: Baseline characteristics and stone burden were comparable between the two groups. Torque analysis demonstrated a higher upper limb torque ratio in Group A compared to Group B. Ergonomic evaluation revealed a significant advantage for Group A (total score: 16.1 ± 4.1 vs. 22.4 ± 9.1, P = 0.001). Group A also had a significantly shorter mean hospitalization duration (1.7 ± 0.9 days vs. 2.9 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.003). Although the mean operative time for Group A was shorter (49.9 ± 26.1 min vs. 63.0 ± 40.4 min), this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.139). No significant differences were observed in initial stone-free status (SFS), 3-month SFR, postoperative Day 1 hemoglobin drop, or overall complication rates.

Conclusion: The "Gun-holding" surgical posture is a feasible, efficient, and safe alternative for performing RIRS, offering significant ergonomic benefits to surgeons.

柔性输尿管镜中“持枪”手术姿势与传统手术姿势的对比:一项前瞻性随机研究。
导读:逆行肾内结石手术(RIRS)的人体工程学方面仍未得到充分研究,尽管它们在减少外科医生的肌肉骨骼劳损和提高手术效率方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究介绍了一种新的RIRS“持枪”手术姿势,旨在改善外科医生的身体健康,延长他们的手术生涯。材料与方法:从2023年7月至2024年6月104例患者中,前瞻性纳入60例患者,随机分为“持枪”手术体位组(a组,n = 30)和常规手术体位组(B组,n = 30)。分析了患者人口统计学、临床结果、人体工程学评估和外科医生的扭矩分析。结果:两组患者的基线特征和结石负担具有可比性。扭矩分析显示,a组的上肢扭矩比高于b组。人体工程学评估显示,a组具有显著优势(总分:16.1±4.1比22.4±9.1,P = 0.001)。A组患者的平均住院时间也显著缩短(1.7±0.9天比2.9±1.9天,P = 0.003)。虽然A组平均手术时间较短(49.9±26.1 min vs. 63.0±40.4 min),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.139)。在初始无结石状态(SFS)、3个月SFR、术后第1天血红蛋白下降或总并发症发生率方面均未观察到显著差异。结论:“持枪”手术体位是一种可行、高效、安全的RIRS手术方式,对外科医生具有显著的人体工程学益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信