Educational attainment and mental health outcomes: A within-sibship Mendelian randomization study.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
María Fernanda Vinueza Veloz, Laxmi Bhatta, Paul R Jones, Martin Tesli, George Davey Smith, Neil M Davies, Ben M Brumpton, Øyvind E Næss
{"title":"Educational attainment and mental health outcomes: A within-sibship Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"María Fernanda Vinueza Veloz, Laxmi Bhatta, Paul R Jones, Martin Tesli, George Davey Smith, Neil M Davies, Ben M Brumpton, Øyvind E Næss","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725101736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies indicate that higher educational attainment (EA) is associated with a lower risk of many mental health conditions (MHC). We assessed to what extent this association is influenced by genetic nurture and demographic factors (i.e., assortative mating and population structure).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a within-sibship Mendelian randomization (MR) study. The sample consisted of 61 880 siblings (27 507 sibships) from the Trøndelag Health Study-HUNT (Norway) and UK Biobank (United Kingdom). MHC outcomes included symptom scores for anxiety, depression, and neuroticism, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, along with self-reported psychotropic medication use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One standard deviation (SD) increase in liability to EA was associated with lower anxiety (-0.20 SD [95% CI: -0.26, -0.14]), depression (-0.11 SD [-0.43, -0.22]), and neuroticism scores (-0.30 SD [-0.53, -0.06]), as well as lower odds of psychotropic medication use (OR: 0.60 [0.52, 0.69]). Within-sibship MR estimates remained consistent with population-based estimates: anxiety (-0.17 SD [-0.33, -0.00]); depression (-0.18 SD [-1.26, 0.89]); neuroticism (-0.29 SD [-0.43, -0.15]); psychotropic medication use (OR, 0.52 [0.34, 0.82]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher EA or genetic liability to education reduces symptoms of anxiety, neuroticism, and psychotropic medication use. These mental health benefits do not seem to be explained by EA-linked genetic nurture or demographic factors. Regarding depression, results were less conclusive due to imprecise estimates, though beneficial effects of genetic liability to higher EA are possible and warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e282"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725101736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Observational studies indicate that higher educational attainment (EA) is associated with a lower risk of many mental health conditions (MHC). We assessed to what extent this association is influenced by genetic nurture and demographic factors (i.e., assortative mating and population structure).

Methods: We conducted a within-sibship Mendelian randomization (MR) study. The sample consisted of 61 880 siblings (27 507 sibships) from the Trøndelag Health Study-HUNT (Norway) and UK Biobank (United Kingdom). MHC outcomes included symptom scores for anxiety, depression, and neuroticism, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, along with self-reported psychotropic medication use.

Results: One standard deviation (SD) increase in liability to EA was associated with lower anxiety (-0.20 SD [95% CI: -0.26, -0.14]), depression (-0.11 SD [-0.43, -0.22]), and neuroticism scores (-0.30 SD [-0.53, -0.06]), as well as lower odds of psychotropic medication use (OR: 0.60 [0.52, 0.69]). Within-sibship MR estimates remained consistent with population-based estimates: anxiety (-0.17 SD [-0.33, -0.00]); depression (-0.18 SD [-1.26, 0.89]); neuroticism (-0.29 SD [-0.43, -0.15]); psychotropic medication use (OR, 0.52 [0.34, 0.82]).

Conclusions: Higher EA or genetic liability to education reduces symptoms of anxiety, neuroticism, and psychotropic medication use. These mental health benefits do not seem to be explained by EA-linked genetic nurture or demographic factors. Regarding depression, results were less conclusive due to imprecise estimates, though beneficial effects of genetic liability to higher EA are possible and warrant further investigation.

受教育程度与心理健康结果:一项兄弟姐妹内孟德尔随机研究。
背景:观察性研究表明,较高的教育程度(EA)与许多心理健康状况(MHC)的风险较低相关。我们评估了这种关联在多大程度上受到遗传培养和人口因素(即,分类交配和人口结构)的影响。方法:我们进行了一项兄弟姐妹内孟德尔随机化(MR)研究。样本包括61 880名兄弟姐妹(27 507名兄弟姐妹),来自挪威Trøndelag Health Study-HUNT和英国生物银行(UK Biobank)。MHC结果包括焦虑、抑郁和神经质的症状评分,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表、7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表、9项患者健康问卷和艾森克人格问卷,以及自我报告的精神药物使用情况进行测量。结果:一个标准差(SD)的增加与较低的焦虑(-0.20 SD [95% CI: -0.26, -0.14])、抑郁(-0.11 SD[-0.43, -0.22])和神经质评分(-0.30 SD[-0.53, -0.06])以及较低的精神药物使用几率(OR: 0.60[0.52, 0.69])相关。兄弟姐妹间MR估计与基于人群的估计保持一致:焦虑(-0.17 SD [-0.33, -0.00]);抑郁(-0.18 SD [-1.26, 0.89]);神经质(-0.29 SD [-0.43, -0.15]);精神药物使用(OR, 0.52[0.34, 0.82])。结论:较高的EA或遗传教育倾向可减少焦虑、神经质和精神药物的使用。这些心理健康益处似乎不能用与ea相关的遗传培养或人口因素来解释。关于抑郁症,由于估计不精确,结果不太确定,尽管遗传倾向对较高EA的有益影响是可能的,值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信