Saleh Abualhaj, Mosleh M Abualhaj, Mohammad Aljaidi, Anas As'ad, Mohammad Aladaileh, Omar S Mansour, Lina Alshadfan
{"title":"Perceptions and Limitations of Free Flap Procedures Among Surgeons in Jordan: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Saleh Abualhaj, Mosleh M Abualhaj, Mohammad Aljaidi, Anas As'ad, Mohammad Aladaileh, Omar S Mansour, Lina Alshadfan","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Free flap procedures are essential in reconstructive surgery, yet their use is influenced by multiple factors, including infrastructure, training, financial constraints, and surgeon experience. This study explored the perceptions of Jordanian surgeons regarding the limitations of free flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Jordanian surgeons, including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, and vascular surgeons. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, assessing infrastructure, resources, training, education, funding, insurance, and surgeon experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.1, and comparisons between plastic and reconstructive surgeons and other surgical specialists were made using chi-square and independent <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A survey of 120 surgeons revealed that 70% had access to sufficient resources, but 55% had limited access to specialized tools and concerns about institutional budgeting and equipment maintenance. Additionally, 50% had no formal training in free flap procedures, whereas 40% received training during residency. Financial constraints influenced decision-making, with 53% citing affordability and insurance issues. Experience was a key factor, with 45.8% reporting limited exposure to free flaps and 88% recognizing surgeon expertise as critical to success. Plastic surgeons were more likely to have formal training and greater experience with free flap procedures than other specialists (<i>P</i> = 0.04, 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted challenges in the adoption of free flap procedures in Jordan, such as limited access to specialized tools, inadequate training, financial constraints, and disparities in surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for structured training programs, improved institutional support, and improved insurance policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7079"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Free flap procedures are essential in reconstructive surgery, yet their use is influenced by multiple factors, including infrastructure, training, financial constraints, and surgeon experience. This study explored the perceptions of Jordanian surgeons regarding the limitations of free flap procedures.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Jordanian surgeons, including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, and vascular surgeons. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, assessing infrastructure, resources, training, education, funding, insurance, and surgeon experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.1, and comparisons between plastic and reconstructive surgeons and other surgical specialists were made using chi-square and independent t tests.
Results: A survey of 120 surgeons revealed that 70% had access to sufficient resources, but 55% had limited access to specialized tools and concerns about institutional budgeting and equipment maintenance. Additionally, 50% had no formal training in free flap procedures, whereas 40% received training during residency. Financial constraints influenced decision-making, with 53% citing affordability and insurance issues. Experience was a key factor, with 45.8% reporting limited exposure to free flaps and 88% recognizing surgeon expertise as critical to success. Plastic surgeons were more likely to have formal training and greater experience with free flap procedures than other specialists (P = 0.04, 0.002, respectively).
Conclusions: The study highlighted challenges in the adoption of free flap procedures in Jordan, such as limited access to specialized tools, inadequate training, financial constraints, and disparities in surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for structured training programs, improved institutional support, and improved insurance policies.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.