Quantitative Analysis of Male Versus Female Frontal Bone and Orbital Skeletal Morphology.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007068
Meagan Wu, Lauren K Salinero, Ashley E Chang, Jonathan H Sussman, Benjamin B Massenburg, Zachary D Zapatero, Mariana O Almeida, Derek M Steinbacher, Jesse A Taylor, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of Male Versus Female Frontal Bone and Orbital Skeletal Morphology.","authors":"Meagan Wu, Lauren K Salinero, Ashley E Chang, Jonathan H Sussman, Benjamin B Massenburg, Zachary D Zapatero, Mariana O Almeida, Derek M Steinbacher, Jesse A Taylor, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the field of facial feminization surgery expands, plastic surgeons have increasingly sought to better understand differences in skeletal morphology between men and women. This study investigated sex-based differences in the frontal bone and orbital regions by quantitatively describing morphological variability in an adult cisgender population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed healthy adults who underwent head computerized tomography imaging before orthognathic surgery. Standardized sets of 501 digital landmarks were used to capture surface morphometrics of the forehead, supraorbital ridges, and orbital rims. All landmarked crania were aligned using Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Principal component analysis evaluated the contribution of sex to the overall variance in coordinates. Using robust rank aggregation, a ranked list of important landmarks or \"features\" most predictive of sex was generated after integrating mean feature differences, linear discriminant analysis, and random forest importance scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 patients were analyzed, including 70 (45%) men and 84 (55%) women imaged at 23.6 ± 7.7 and 26.0 ± 11.1 years of age, respectively. A list of 119 important features with significant aggregate rank scores (<i>P</i> < 0.05) demonstrated the greatest sex-based variability at the (1) upper forehead, (2) glabella and medial brow prominences, and (3) outer infraorbital rims, primarily in the posterior/anterior direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified key anatomical regions of the upper facial third with the greatest sex-based variability. Our findings provide an objective framework upon which continued investigations of skeletal dimorphisms may be performed and provide preliminary data to help guide preoperative counseling and surgical planning for facial feminization surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the field of facial feminization surgery expands, plastic surgeons have increasingly sought to better understand differences in skeletal morphology between men and women. This study investigated sex-based differences in the frontal bone and orbital regions by quantitatively describing morphological variability in an adult cisgender population.

Methods: We reviewed healthy adults who underwent head computerized tomography imaging before orthognathic surgery. Standardized sets of 501 digital landmarks were used to capture surface morphometrics of the forehead, supraorbital ridges, and orbital rims. All landmarked crania were aligned using Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Principal component analysis evaluated the contribution of sex to the overall variance in coordinates. Using robust rank aggregation, a ranked list of important landmarks or "features" most predictive of sex was generated after integrating mean feature differences, linear discriminant analysis, and random forest importance scores.

Results: A total of 154 patients were analyzed, including 70 (45%) men and 84 (55%) women imaged at 23.6 ± 7.7 and 26.0 ± 11.1 years of age, respectively. A list of 119 important features with significant aggregate rank scores (P < 0.05) demonstrated the greatest sex-based variability at the (1) upper forehead, (2) glabella and medial brow prominences, and (3) outer infraorbital rims, primarily in the posterior/anterior direction.

Conclusions: We identified key anatomical regions of the upper facial third with the greatest sex-based variability. Our findings provide an objective framework upon which continued investigations of skeletal dimorphisms may be performed and provide preliminary data to help guide preoperative counseling and surgical planning for facial feminization surgery.

男性与女性额骨和眶骨形态的定量分析。
背景:随着面部女性化手术领域的扩大,整形外科医生越来越多地寻求更好地了解男性和女性骨骼形态的差异。本研究通过定量描述成年顺性别人群的形态变异,调查了额骨和眶区基于性别的差异。方法:我们回顾了在正颌手术前接受头部计算机断层成像的健康成年人。使用标准化的501个数字地标集来捕获前额、眶上脊和眶缘的表面形态计量学。所有地标性颅骨均采用广义普罗斯特分析进行对齐。主成分分析在坐标上评估性别对总方差的贡献。在综合了平均特征差异、线性判别分析和随机森林重要性分数之后,使用鲁棒秩聚合,生成了最能预测性别的重要标志或“特征”的排序列表。结果:共分析154例患者,其中男性70例(45%),女性84例(55%),年龄分别为23.6±7.7岁和26.0±11.1岁。119个重要特征的综合评分显著(P < 0.05)表明,在(1)前额上、(2)眉间和内侧眉突出、(3)眶下外缘,主要在后/前方向上,性别差异最大。结论:我们确定了面部上三分之一的关键解剖区域,其性别差异最大。我们的研究结果提供了一个客观的框架,在此基础上可以继续进行骨骼二态性的研究,并提供初步的数据,以帮助指导面部女性化手术的术前咨询和手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信