Ultrasound-Guided Regional Block in Renal Transplantation: Towards Personalized Pain Management.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ahmad Mirza, Munazza Khan, Zachary Massey, Usman Baig, Imran Gani, Shameem Beigh
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Regional Block in Renal Transplantation: Towards Personalized Pain Management.","authors":"Ahmad Mirza, Munazza Khan, Zachary Massey, Usman Baig, Imran Gani, Shameem Beigh","doi":"10.3390/jpm15090411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The management of peri-operative pain significantly impacts the post-operative recovery following kidney transplant. For decades, regional blocks have been utilized for post-operative pain management following abdominal surgery. The data on the routine use of regional blocks peri-operatively during kidney transplants are limited. We aim to review our current clinical practice of peri-operative use of regional blocks during kidney transplants and management of peri-operative pain up to 24 h. <b>Methods:</b> A consecutive series of 100 patients who underwent kidney transplant was reviewed. All demographic data including patient's age, gender, race, and body mass index were collected. Pre-transplant co-morbidities were summarized for all patients and included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Group A consisted of patients who received an ultrasound-guided TAP block, while Group B included patients who did not receive any form of TAP block. The intra-operative and post-operative use of analgesia was recorded for up to 24 h post kidney transplant. All peri-operative complications were reviewed. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test was used to compare symptoms (nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) between the two groups. Similarly, the use of analgesia was also compared. <b>Results:</b> A total of 100 patients were identified and equally distributed between the two groups [Group A = 50 (TAP block), Group B = 50 (non-TAP block)]. There was a statistically significant reduction in the use of intraoperative fentanyl (<i>p</i> = 0.04) in Group A. There was no difference in the post-operative use of hydromorphone (<i>p</i> = 0.665), oxycodone (<i>p</i> = 0.75), and acetaminophen (<i>p</i> = 0.64) up to 24 h after the kidney transplant procedure. There was no difference between post-operative nausea (<i>p</i> = 0.766), vomiting (<i>p</i> = 0.436), and pruritus. There were no complications recorded secondary to the use of regional blocks in Group A. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of regional anesthesia in kidney transplant recipients is a safe approach without complications. The study concluded that regional blocks decrease the use of intra-operative opioids. However, there was no difference in the use of post-operative requirements for analgesia or side effects up to 24 h after kidney transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15090411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The management of peri-operative pain significantly impacts the post-operative recovery following kidney transplant. For decades, regional blocks have been utilized for post-operative pain management following abdominal surgery. The data on the routine use of regional blocks peri-operatively during kidney transplants are limited. We aim to review our current clinical practice of peri-operative use of regional blocks during kidney transplants and management of peri-operative pain up to 24 h. Methods: A consecutive series of 100 patients who underwent kidney transplant was reviewed. All demographic data including patient's age, gender, race, and body mass index were collected. Pre-transplant co-morbidities were summarized for all patients and included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Group A consisted of patients who received an ultrasound-guided TAP block, while Group B included patients who did not receive any form of TAP block. The intra-operative and post-operative use of analgesia was recorded for up to 24 h post kidney transplant. All peri-operative complications were reviewed. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test was used to compare symptoms (nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) between the two groups. Similarly, the use of analgesia was also compared. Results: A total of 100 patients were identified and equally distributed between the two groups [Group A = 50 (TAP block), Group B = 50 (non-TAP block)]. There was a statistically significant reduction in the use of intraoperative fentanyl (p = 0.04) in Group A. There was no difference in the post-operative use of hydromorphone (p = 0.665), oxycodone (p = 0.75), and acetaminophen (p = 0.64) up to 24 h after the kidney transplant procedure. There was no difference between post-operative nausea (p = 0.766), vomiting (p = 0.436), and pruritus. There were no complications recorded secondary to the use of regional blocks in Group A. Conclusions: The use of regional anesthesia in kidney transplant recipients is a safe approach without complications. The study concluded that regional blocks decrease the use of intra-operative opioids. However, there was no difference in the use of post-operative requirements for analgesia or side effects up to 24 h after kidney transplant.

Abstract Image

超声引导的肾移植局部阻滞:迈向个性化疼痛管理。
导言:围手术期疼痛的处理对肾移植术后的恢复有重要影响。几十年来,局部阻滞已被用于腹部手术后疼痛管理。关于肾移植围手术期常规使用局部阻滞的数据有限。我们的目的是回顾我们目前的临床实践,在肾移植围手术期使用区域阻滞和处理围手术期疼痛长达24小时。方法:连续系列100例接受肾移植的患者进行了回顾。收集患者年龄、性别、种族、体重指数等所有人口统计数据。对所有患者的移植前合并症进行总结,并纳入美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分。根据患者是否接受了腹横平面(TAP)阻滞,将患者分为两组。A组由接受超声引导的TAP阻滞的患者组成,而B组包括未接受任何形式TAP阻滞的患者。记录肾移植后24小时内术中及术后镇痛的使用情况。回顾所有围手术期并发症。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较两组患者的症状(恶心、呕吐和瘙痒)。同样,镇痛药的使用也进行了比较。结果:共确定100例患者,并均匀分布于两组[A组= 50例(TAP阻断),B组= 50例(非TAP阻断)]。a组术中芬太尼的使用有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。肾移植术后24小时内氢吗啡酮(p = 0.665)、羟考酮(p = 0.75)和对乙酰氨基酚(p = 0.64)的使用无统计学差异。术后恶心(p = 0.766)、呕吐(p = 0.436)、瘙痒无明显差异。在a组中没有继发使用区域阻滞的并发症记录。结论:在肾移植受者中使用区域麻醉是一种安全无并发症的方法。该研究得出结论,局部阻滞减少了术中阿片类药物的使用。然而,在肾移植后24小时内,使用术后镇痛或副作用的要求没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信