Comparative Efficacy of Two Hemostatic Agents in Post-Extraction Bleeding Control Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Giovanna Pesce, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende, Madelaine Torres da Silva, Jose Mauro Granjeiro, Massimo Del Fabbro, Carlos Fernando Mourão, Monica Calasans-Maia
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Two Hemostatic Agents in Post-Extraction Bleeding Control Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Giovanna Pesce, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende, Madelaine Torres da Silva, Jose Mauro Granjeiro, Massimo Del Fabbro, Carlos Fernando Mourão, Monica Calasans-Maia","doi":"10.3390/jfb16090305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adequate bleeding control is crucial in surgical procedures. Surgifoam and Hemospon are absorbable hemostatic sponges made from lyophilized porcine gelatin, commonly used in oral surgery. This clinical study aimed to evaluate bleeding control, soft tissue healing, and postoperative pain in dental sockets after mandibular third molar extractions filled with Surgifoam and Hemospon. Twenty-five volunteers requiring extractions of both left and right lower third molars participated in this randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. After extraction, each socket was randomly filled with Hemospon (test group) or Surgifoam (control group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Bleeding at 30 and 60 min (Souto and Mühlemann scales) and soft tissue healing at 7 and 14 days (Brancaccio scale) were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Bleeding scores at 30 min predominantly showed no bleeding (score 0) in 80% of participants using Surgifoam, compared to 60% in the Hemospon group. No significant differences in bleeding were observed between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and both showed a similar reduction over time. Soft tissue healing was revealed at 14 days complete healing (score 0) in 90% of participants in both groups. No significant differences between Hemospon<sup>®</sup> and Surgifoam<sup>®</sup> were observed (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Postoperative pain evaluation showed highly variable scores on the first day (median: 2; range: 1-6) for both Surgifoam<sup>®</sup> and Hemospon<sup>®</sup>. By the seventh day, pain levels significantly reduced (median: 0), with no significant differences observed between the groups at any time point (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that Hemospon and Surgifoam are equally effective in bleeding control, healing, and pain control after third molar surgery. This research aims to guide surgeons on the clinical aspects of using these specific hemostatic sponges in post-extraction procedures for posterior molars and seeks to direct future clinical studies involving these materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adequate bleeding control is crucial in surgical procedures. Surgifoam and Hemospon are absorbable hemostatic sponges made from lyophilized porcine gelatin, commonly used in oral surgery. This clinical study aimed to evaluate bleeding control, soft tissue healing, and postoperative pain in dental sockets after mandibular third molar extractions filled with Surgifoam and Hemospon. Twenty-five volunteers requiring extractions of both left and right lower third molars participated in this randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. After extraction, each socket was randomly filled with Hemospon (test group) or Surgifoam (control group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Bleeding at 30 and 60 min (Souto and Mühlemann scales) and soft tissue healing at 7 and 14 days (Brancaccio scale) were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Bleeding scores at 30 min predominantly showed no bleeding (score 0) in 80% of participants using Surgifoam, compared to 60% in the Hemospon group. No significant differences in bleeding were observed between groups (p > 0.05), and both showed a similar reduction over time. Soft tissue healing was revealed at 14 days complete healing (score 0) in 90% of participants in both groups. No significant differences between Hemospon® and Surgifoam® were observed (p > 0.05). Postoperative pain evaluation showed highly variable scores on the first day (median: 2; range: 1-6) for both Surgifoam® and Hemospon®. By the seventh day, pain levels significantly reduced (median: 0), with no significant differences observed between the groups at any time point (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that Hemospon and Surgifoam are equally effective in bleeding control, healing, and pain control after third molar surgery. This research aims to guide surgeons on the clinical aspects of using these specific hemostatic sponges in post-extraction procedures for posterior molars and seeks to direct future clinical studies involving these materials.

两种止血药物对下颌第三磨牙手术拔牙后出血控制的比较疗效:一项随机临床试验。
充分的出血控制在外科手术中是至关重要的。Surgifoam和haemspon是由冻干的猪明胶制成的可吸收止血海绵,通常用于口腔手术。本临床研究旨在评估使用Surgifoam和homspon填充的下颌第三磨牙拔牙后出血控制、软组织愈合和牙槽术后疼痛。25名需要拔除左、右下三磨牙的志愿者参加了这项随机、双盲、分口的研究。拔牙后,每个孔内随机填充止血海绵(试验组)或Surgifoam(对照组)。术后第1、2、3、7天采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛。采用Fisher精确试验评估30min和60min出血(Souto和m hlemann评分)和7 d和14 d软组织愈合(Brancaccio评分)。在使用Surgifoam的患者中,80%的患者在30分钟内无出血(0分),而在使用止血海绵的患者中,这一比例为60%。两组间出血无显著差异(p < 0.05),且两组随时间减少相似。两组90%的受试者在14天软组织完全愈合(评分0)。hemspon®与Surgifoam®之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。术后疼痛评估显示,Surgifoam®和hemspon®在第一天的评分变化很大(中位数:2;范围:1-6)。到第7天,疼痛水平显著降低(中位数:0),各组之间在任何时间点均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。总之,本研究结果表明,在第三磨牙手术后,止血海绵和外科泡沫在止血、愈合和疼痛控制方面同样有效。本研究旨在指导外科医生在后磨牙拔牙过程中使用这些特殊止血海绵的临床方面,并寻求指导未来涉及这些材料的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信