The potential of large language models in the field of infertility: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Wei Li, Attiq Ur-Rehman, Meng-Wei Ge, Lu-Ting Shen, Xi-Yuan Peng, Kang Zhong, Rui Feng, SiQi Gao, Fei-Hong Hu, Yi-Jie Jia, Hong-Lin Chen
{"title":"The potential of large language models in the field of infertility: a systematic review.","authors":"Wei Li, Attiq Ur-Rehman, Meng-Wei Ge, Lu-Ting Shen, Xi-Yuan Peng, Kang Zhong, Rui Feng, SiQi Gao, Fei-Hong Hu, Yi-Jie Jia, Hong-Lin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03679-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Large language models have demonstrated significant potential across a wide range of medical fields and may potentially induce a transformation in the field of infertility and sterility. This systematic review aims to synthesize existing research and explore the current strengths and limitations of large language models in the field of infertility and sterility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers conducted a comprehensive search across three databases and employed a thematic synthesis approach for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included a total of 13 studies. Large language models exhibited advantages in the accuracy and reproducibility of information output and consultation, demonstrated robust learning capabilities, and were able to provide satisfactory recommendations to patients. However, there were significant variations in the performance of different large language models, and the readability of the output information was poor, making it difficult to provide comprehensive answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the domain of infertility, large language models have not yet achieved full reliability and should be regarded solely as information sources whose outputs require careful verification; they are presently incapable of substituting for clinical diagnosis. Their development requires increased investment in relevant technologies and the use of authoritative, accurate information to unlock their potential in this field and other medical areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03679-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Large language models have demonstrated significant potential across a wide range of medical fields and may potentially induce a transformation in the field of infertility and sterility. This systematic review aims to synthesize existing research and explore the current strengths and limitations of large language models in the field of infertility and sterility.

Methods: Researchers conducted a comprehensive search across three databases and employed a thematic synthesis approach for data analysis.

Results: The analysis included a total of 13 studies. Large language models exhibited advantages in the accuracy and reproducibility of information output and consultation, demonstrated robust learning capabilities, and were able to provide satisfactory recommendations to patients. However, there were significant variations in the performance of different large language models, and the readability of the output information was poor, making it difficult to provide comprehensive answers.

Conclusion: In the domain of infertility, large language models have not yet achieved full reliability and should be regarded solely as information sources whose outputs require careful verification; they are presently incapable of substituting for clinical diagnosis. Their development requires increased investment in relevant technologies and the use of authoritative, accurate information to unlock their potential in this field and other medical areas.

大型语言模型在不孕症领域的潜力:系统综述。
目的:大型语言模型在广泛的医学领域显示出巨大的潜力,并可能引发不孕症和不育领域的变革。本系统综述旨在综合现有研究,探讨目前大型语言模型在不孕症和不育领域的优势和局限性。方法:研究人员对三个数据库进行了全面检索,并采用主题综合方法进行数据分析。结果:本分析共纳入13项研究。大型语言模型在信息输出和咨询的准确性和可重复性方面具有优势,表现出强大的学习能力,并能够为患者提供满意的建议。然而,不同大型语言模型的性能差异较大,输出信息的可读性较差,难以提供全面的答案。结论:在不孕不育领域,大型语言模型尚未达到完全的可靠性,应单独视为信息源,其输出需要仔细验证;它们目前还不能代替临床诊断。它们的发展需要增加对相关技术的投资,并使用权威、准确的信息,以释放它们在这一领域和其他医疗领域的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信