Melissa Pitton, Johannes C Rusch, Shotaro Torii, Lea Caduff, Charles Gan, Federica Cariti, Patrick Schmidhalter, Christoph Ort, Tamar Kohn, Timothy R Julian
{"title":"Performance and characteristics of three digital PCR platforms for detection and quantification of viral targets in wastewater.","authors":"Melissa Pitton, Johannes C Rusch, Shotaro Torii, Lea Caduff, Charles Gan, Federica Cariti, Patrick Schmidhalter, Christoph Ort, Tamar Kohn, Timothy R Julian","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxaf243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The wider implementation of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has increased the necessity for nucleic acid detection and quantification from complex samples. Here, we compared the performance and the characteristics of three digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The dPCR platforms selected in this study included the QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital PCR System from Bio-Rad, the QIAcuity One, 2plex Device from Qiagen, and the 3-color Naica System manufactured by Stilla Technologies. Platforms were compared and described based on their handling in the laboratory and performance quantifying two viral targets-SARS-CoV-2 and Norovirus GII-in wastewater samples. Our findings showed that no single platform consistently outperformed the others in terms of target quantification. Moreover, we observed similarities amongst the systems with respect to resilience to inhibition, but differences in laboratory handling including sample throughput and method of quantification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that all three selected dPCR platforms are similarly suitable for WBS, as quantitative performance of the systems for viral RNA targets extracted from wastewater is comparable. Decisions on platform selection can be driven by researcher preference on handling, throughput, and other differentiating characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: The wider implementation of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has increased the necessity for nucleic acid detection and quantification from complex samples. Here, we compared the performance and the characteristics of three digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) platforms.
Methods and results: The dPCR platforms selected in this study included the QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital PCR System from Bio-Rad, the QIAcuity One, 2plex Device from Qiagen, and the 3-color Naica System manufactured by Stilla Technologies. Platforms were compared and described based on their handling in the laboratory and performance quantifying two viral targets-SARS-CoV-2 and Norovirus GII-in wastewater samples. Our findings showed that no single platform consistently outperformed the others in terms of target quantification. Moreover, we observed similarities amongst the systems with respect to resilience to inhibition, but differences in laboratory handling including sample throughput and method of quantification.
Conclusions: This study suggests that all three selected dPCR platforms are similarly suitable for WBS, as quantitative performance of the systems for viral RNA targets extracted from wastewater is comparable. Decisions on platform selection can be driven by researcher preference on handling, throughput, and other differentiating characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.