Cristina Jiménez-Jara, Rodrigo Salas, Rienzi Díaz-Navarro, Steren Chabert, Marcelo E Andia, Julián Vega, Jesús Urbina, Sergio Uribe, Tetsuro Sekine, Francesca Raimondi, Julio Sotelo
{"title":"AI Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Cristina Jiménez-Jara, Rodrigo Salas, Rienzi Díaz-Navarro, Steren Chabert, Marcelo E Andia, Julián Vega, Jesús Urbina, Sergio Uribe, Tetsuro Sekine, Francesca Raimondi, Julio Sotelo","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12090345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has become a key tool in evaluating myocardial injury secondary to coronary artery disease (CAD), providing detailed assessments of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue composition. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning techniques, has enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of CMR by automating segmentation, improving image interpretation, and accelerating clinical workflows. Radiomics, through the extraction of quantitative imaging features, complements AI by revealing sub-visual patterns relevant to disease characterization. This systematic review analyzed AI applications in CMR for CAD. A structured search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 17 March 2025, following PRISMA guidelines and quality-assessed with the CLAIM checklist. A total of 106 studies were included: 46 on classification, 19 using radiomics, and 41 on segmentation. AI models were used to classify CAD vs. controls, predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), arrhythmias, and post-infarction remodeling. Radiomics enabled differentiation of acute vs. chronic infarction and prediction of microvascular obstruction, sometimes from non-contrast CMR. Segmentation achieved high performance for myocardium (DSC up to 0.95), but scar and edema delineation were more challenging. Reported performance was moderate-to-high across tasks (classification AUC = 0.66-1.00; segmentation DSC = 0.43-0.97; radiomics AUC = 0.57-0.99). Despite promising results, limitations included small or overlapping datasets. In conclusion, AI and radiomics offer substantial potential to support diagnosis and prognosis of CAD through advanced CMR image analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has become a key tool in evaluating myocardial injury secondary to coronary artery disease (CAD), providing detailed assessments of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue composition. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning techniques, has enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of CMR by automating segmentation, improving image interpretation, and accelerating clinical workflows. Radiomics, through the extraction of quantitative imaging features, complements AI by revealing sub-visual patterns relevant to disease characterization. This systematic review analyzed AI applications in CMR for CAD. A structured search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 17 March 2025, following PRISMA guidelines and quality-assessed with the CLAIM checklist. A total of 106 studies were included: 46 on classification, 19 using radiomics, and 41 on segmentation. AI models were used to classify CAD vs. controls, predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), arrhythmias, and post-infarction remodeling. Radiomics enabled differentiation of acute vs. chronic infarction and prediction of microvascular obstruction, sometimes from non-contrast CMR. Segmentation achieved high performance for myocardium (DSC up to 0.95), but scar and edema delineation were more challenging. Reported performance was moderate-to-high across tasks (classification AUC = 0.66-1.00; segmentation DSC = 0.43-0.97; radiomics AUC = 0.57-0.99). Despite promising results, limitations included small or overlapping datasets. In conclusion, AI and radiomics offer substantial potential to support diagnosis and prognosis of CAD through advanced CMR image analysis.