Development and validation of machine-learning model based on dynamic tumor markers in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bin Chen, Tengyi Peng, Zhen Pan, Shoufeng Li, Ye Wang, Shaoqing Zheng, Jinfu Zhuang, Xing Liu, Xingrong Lu, Changqing Zeng, Guoxian Guan
{"title":"Development and validation of machine-learning model based on dynamic tumor markers in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Bin Chen, Tengyi Peng, Zhen Pan, Shoufeng Li, Ye Wang, Shaoqing Zheng, Jinfu Zhuang, Xing Liu, Xingrong Lu, Changqing Zeng, Guoxian Guan","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04993-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we constructed a new pCR predictor based on dynamic tumor marker changes before and after NCRT, the dynamic tumor marker score (DTMS), and combined it with other clinicopathological features to build a machine-learning model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study of patients with LARC between September 2010 and October 2017 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (FJMUFAH), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJMUUH), and Fujian Provincial Hospital (FJPH), the DTMS predictor was constructed using logistic regression. Factors associated with pCR were screened using single-factor and multifactorial logistic regression, and 10 machine-learning algorithms were used to construct a pCR prediction model. Additionally, various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), decision curve analysis, and calibration curves, were obtained to validate the model performance and verified using an external validation set. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the predictive model. Moreover, we developed a website to facilitate the use of prediction modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After analyzing the data of 892 patients with LARC from FJMUFAH, DTMS, tumor size, N stage, and tumor distance from the anal verge were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The \"extreme gradient boosting\" (XGB) model displayed the best performance in the training set, with a mean AUC value of 0.86, an AUPRC value of 0.732, and SHAP values utilized in the analysis. In the two external validation sets, the model yielded AUC values of 0.80 and 0.82, along with corresponding AUPRC values of 0.519 and 0.593, respectively, which were the highest among all ten evaluated models, incorporating the use of SHAP values in the analysis. The model maintained superior predictive efficacy in the external validation cohorts (FJMUUH and FJPH).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a novel marker based on dynamic changes in CEA and CA19-9 levels, DTMS effectively predicted pCR within the XGB model, providing clinicians with a practical tool for treatment decision-making regarding LARC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04993-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we constructed a new pCR predictor based on dynamic tumor marker changes before and after NCRT, the dynamic tumor marker score (DTMS), and combined it with other clinicopathological features to build a machine-learning model.

Methods: In this retrospective study of patients with LARC between September 2010 and October 2017 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (FJMUFAH), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJMUUH), and Fujian Provincial Hospital (FJPH), the DTMS predictor was constructed using logistic regression. Factors associated with pCR were screened using single-factor and multifactorial logistic regression, and 10 machine-learning algorithms were used to construct a pCR prediction model. Additionally, various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), decision curve analysis, and calibration curves, were obtained to validate the model performance and verified using an external validation set. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the predictive model. Moreover, we developed a website to facilitate the use of prediction modeling.

Results: After analyzing the data of 892 patients with LARC from FJMUFAH, DTMS, tumor size, N stage, and tumor distance from the anal verge were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The "extreme gradient boosting" (XGB) model displayed the best performance in the training set, with a mean AUC value of 0.86, an AUPRC value of 0.732, and SHAP values utilized in the analysis. In the two external validation sets, the model yielded AUC values of 0.80 and 0.82, along with corresponding AUPRC values of 0.519 and 0.593, respectively, which were the highest among all ten evaluated models, incorporating the use of SHAP values in the analysis. The model maintained superior predictive efficacy in the external validation cohorts (FJMUUH and FJPH).

Conclusions: As a novel marker based on dynamic changes in CEA and CA19-9 levels, DTMS effectively predicted pCR within the XGB model, providing clinicians with a practical tool for treatment decision-making regarding LARC.

基于动态肿瘤标志物的机器学习模型在预测局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解中的开发和验证:一项多中心队列研究。
目的:本研究基于NCRT前后动态肿瘤标志物变化,即动态肿瘤标志物评分(dynamic tumor marker score, DTMS),构建新的pCR预测因子,并结合其他临床病理特征,构建机器学习模型。方法:回顾性研究2010年9月至2017年10月在福建医科大学第一附属医院(FJMUFAH)、福建医科大学联合医院(FJMUUH)和福建省立医院(FJPH)就诊的LARC患者,采用logistic回归构建DTMS预测因子。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归筛选与pCR相关的因素,并采用10种机器学习算法构建pCR预测模型。此外,还获得了各种指标,包括接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、精确度-召回率曲线下面积(AUPRC)、决策曲线分析和校准曲线,以验证模型的性能,并使用外部验证集进行验证。最后,采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值对预测模型进行解释。此外,我们开发了一个网站,以方便使用预测建模。结果:对FJMUFAH 892例LARC患者的资料进行分析后,采用单因素和多因素回归分析,确定DTMS、肿瘤大小、N分期和肿瘤与肛门边缘的距离为pCR的独立预测因素。“极限梯度增强”(extreme gradient boosting, XGB)模型在训练集中表现最好,其平均AUC值为0.86,AUPRC值为0.732,并利用SHAP值进行分析。在两个外部验证集中,该模型的AUC值为0.80和0.82,对应的AUPRC值分别为0.519和0.593,在所有10个评估模型中最高,其中使用了SHAP值进行分析。该模型在外部验证队列(FJMUUH和FJPH)中保持了较好的预测效果。结论:DTMS作为一种基于CEA和CA19-9水平动态变化的新型标志物,能够在XGB模型中有效预测pCR,为临床医生对LARC的治疗决策提供实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信