The Effectiveness of Live and Prerecorded Video Demonstrations in Teaching Restorative Dentistry to Undergraduate Students: Cohort Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rana Alkattan, Lulwah Alreshaid
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Live and Prerecorded Video Demonstrations in Teaching Restorative Dentistry to Undergraduate Students: Cohort Study.","authors":"Rana Alkattan, Lulwah Alreshaid","doi":"10.2196/74383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mastering complex psychomotor skills is essential in undergraduate dental education; however, traditional live demonstrations (LDs) face limitations such as high instructor-to-student ratios and restricted viewing angles. Prerecorded video demonstrations (VDs) offer scalable, repeatable instructions and the ability to integrate multimedia cues but may lack real-time interaction and immediate feedback. There is limited evidence comparing these teaching modalities, particularly regarding gender differences, in the acquisition of restorative dentistry skills.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) compare first-year dental students' knowledge acquisition and procedural performance following a LD versus a prerecorded VD of a class II amalgam restoration and (2) evaluate whether gender influences outcomes within each demonstration method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 51 students enrolled in an Introduction to Operative Dentistry course (2024-2025) participated in this cohort study. The students were randomized into 2 groups: LD (26/51, 51%) or VD (25/51, 49%). Both groups received identical lectures and demonstrations of a standardized class II cavity preparation and amalgam restoration. Knowledge was assessed via preprocedural and postprocedural multiple-choice questionnaires, and the procedural performance was graded by 2 blinded raters using a 10-point rubric. Student perceptions were measured with an 8-item Likert survey. Mixed ANOVA and independent and paired 2-tailed t tests evaluated between-group and within-group differences, while gender analyses used factorial ANOVA. Interrater reliability (interclass correlation coefficient=0.991) was confirmed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline knowledge scores did not differ between the 2 groups. After the demonstration, knowledge was significantly higher with LD (mean 71.22, SD 17.3) than VD (mean 58.4, SD 21.7; P=.02; Cohen d=0.65). The LD method demonstrated significant within-group improvement (P<.001; Cohen d=0.83). Procedural grading favored LD (mean 8.3, SD 0.9 vs mean 7.9, SD 1.0); however, results were not statistically significant (P=.08; Cohen d=0.50). No significant differences were found in the student perception survey. Gender analysis revealed that male students in the LD group achieved higher postknowledge scores (mean 74.0, SD 12.3 vs mean 55.0, SD 24.3; P=.03), greater score improvements (P=.03), and higher grading scores (mean 8.5, SD 0.6 vs mean 7.6, SD 1.3; P=.03) compared to those in the VD group. No significant differences were observed among female students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LDs yielded superior knowledge acquisition and better performance compared to VDs, particularly for male students. VDs remain a viable alternative when supplemented with interactive elements and instructor feedback. Blended teaching models integrating live and video methods may optimize the demonstration experience for the students, thus enhancing the learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e74383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/74383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mastering complex psychomotor skills is essential in undergraduate dental education; however, traditional live demonstrations (LDs) face limitations such as high instructor-to-student ratios and restricted viewing angles. Prerecorded video demonstrations (VDs) offer scalable, repeatable instructions and the ability to integrate multimedia cues but may lack real-time interaction and immediate feedback. There is limited evidence comparing these teaching modalities, particularly regarding gender differences, in the acquisition of restorative dentistry skills.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) compare first-year dental students' knowledge acquisition and procedural performance following a LD versus a prerecorded VD of a class II amalgam restoration and (2) evaluate whether gender influences outcomes within each demonstration method.

Methods: A total of 51 students enrolled in an Introduction to Operative Dentistry course (2024-2025) participated in this cohort study. The students were randomized into 2 groups: LD (26/51, 51%) or VD (25/51, 49%). Both groups received identical lectures and demonstrations of a standardized class II cavity preparation and amalgam restoration. Knowledge was assessed via preprocedural and postprocedural multiple-choice questionnaires, and the procedural performance was graded by 2 blinded raters using a 10-point rubric. Student perceptions were measured with an 8-item Likert survey. Mixed ANOVA and independent and paired 2-tailed t tests evaluated between-group and within-group differences, while gender analyses used factorial ANOVA. Interrater reliability (interclass correlation coefficient=0.991) was confirmed.

Results: The baseline knowledge scores did not differ between the 2 groups. After the demonstration, knowledge was significantly higher with LD (mean 71.22, SD 17.3) than VD (mean 58.4, SD 21.7; P=.02; Cohen d=0.65). The LD method demonstrated significant within-group improvement (P<.001; Cohen d=0.83). Procedural grading favored LD (mean 8.3, SD 0.9 vs mean 7.9, SD 1.0); however, results were not statistically significant (P=.08; Cohen d=0.50). No significant differences were found in the student perception survey. Gender analysis revealed that male students in the LD group achieved higher postknowledge scores (mean 74.0, SD 12.3 vs mean 55.0, SD 24.3; P=.03), greater score improvements (P=.03), and higher grading scores (mean 8.5, SD 0.6 vs mean 7.6, SD 1.3; P=.03) compared to those in the VD group. No significant differences were observed among female students.

Conclusions: LDs yielded superior knowledge acquisition and better performance compared to VDs, particularly for male students. VDs remain a viable alternative when supplemented with interactive elements and instructor feedback. Blended teaching models integrating live and video methods may optimize the demonstration experience for the students, thus enhancing the learning outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

现场和预先录制的视频演示在本科学生修复牙科教学中的有效性:队列研究。
背景:掌握复杂的心理运动技能是本科牙科教育的必要条件;然而,传统的现场演示(ld)面临着诸如教师与学生比例高和观看角度受限等限制。预先录制的视频演示(VDs)提供可扩展的、可重复的指令和集成多媒体提示的能力,但可能缺乏实时交互和即时反馈。比较这些教学方式的证据有限,特别是在获得牙科修复技能方面的性别差异。目的:本研究旨在(1)比较一年级牙科学生在LD与预先记录的II类汞合金修复VD后的知识获取和程序表现;(2)评估性别是否影响每种演示方法的结果。方法:入选2024-2025年牙科学导论课程的51名学生参与队列研究。随机分为LD组(26/51,51%)和VD组(25/51,49%)。两组都接受了相同的讲座和标准化II类空腔制备和汞合金修复的演示。通过手术前和手术后的多项选择问卷对知识进行评估,手术表现由2名盲法评分者采用10分制评分。学生的认知是通过8项李克特调查来衡量的。混合方差分析和独立和配对双尾t检验评估组间和组内差异,而性别分析使用因子方差分析。组间信度(组间相关系数=0.991)得到证实。结果:基线知识得分在两组间无差异。经论证,LD组的知识水平(平均71.22,SD 17.3)显著高于VD组(平均58.4,SD 21.7; P= 0.02; Cohen d=0.65)。LD方法在组内表现出显著的改善(p结论:LD方法与vd方法相比,在知识获取和表现方面表现更好,尤其是对于男生。如果辅以互动元素和教师反馈,dvd仍然是一种可行的选择。结合直播和视频的混合教学模式可以优化学生的演示体验,从而提高学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信