Detection of a white cataract with elevated intralenticular pressure using an optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shota Kamei, Kouhei Hashizume, Junya Kizawa, Daijiro Kurosaka
{"title":"Detection of a white cataract with elevated intralenticular pressure using an optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography.","authors":"Shota Kamei, Kouhei Hashizume, Junya Kizawa, Daijiro Kurosaka","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01284-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether a white cataract (WC) with elevated intralenticular pressure (EWC) can be distinguished from one with normal intralenticular pressure (NWC) using an optical biometer based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study METHODS: Patients with a WC who had undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation at Iwate Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Using surgical videos, WCs with/without leakage of the liquefied cortex or bulging of the swollen cortex were classified as EWC and NWC, respectively. Both groups were compared in terms of age, sex, ocular comorbidities, various parameters, and the presence of characteristic appearances of the liquefied cortex on SS-OCT images. If the parameters were not measured appropriately, remeasurement using SS-OCT images were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 48 patients with a WC, 26 eyes were classified as having an EWC, and 22 as NWC. There were significant differences in lens thickness (LT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), ΔLT, ΔACD (the differences in LT or ACD between the eyes with a WC and the fellow eyes, respectively), and age between an EWC and an NWC. ROC analysis showed that the AUC values of LT, ΔLT, and ΔACD were higher than 0.970. LT required remeasurement in approximately half of the WC, whereas ACD did not. Image evaluation for detecting an EWC had a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 90.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An optical biometer based on SS-OCT may detect an EWC using LT, ΔLT, ΔACD, and SS-OCT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01284-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a white cataract (WC) with elevated intralenticular pressure (EWC) can be distinguished from one with normal intralenticular pressure (NWC) using an optical biometer based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT).

Study design: Retrospective observational study METHODS: Patients with a WC who had undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation at Iwate Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Using surgical videos, WCs with/without leakage of the liquefied cortex or bulging of the swollen cortex were classified as EWC and NWC, respectively. Both groups were compared in terms of age, sex, ocular comorbidities, various parameters, and the presence of characteristic appearances of the liquefied cortex on SS-OCT images. If the parameters were not measured appropriately, remeasurement using SS-OCT images were performed.

Results: Of the 48 patients with a WC, 26 eyes were classified as having an EWC, and 22 as NWC. There were significant differences in lens thickness (LT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), ΔLT, ΔACD (the differences in LT or ACD between the eyes with a WC and the fellow eyes, respectively), and age between an EWC and an NWC. ROC analysis showed that the AUC values of LT, ΔLT, and ΔACD were higher than 0.970. LT required remeasurement in approximately half of the WC, whereas ACD did not. Image evaluation for detecting an EWC had a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 90.9%.

Conclusions: An optical biometer based on SS-OCT may detect an EWC using LT, ΔLT, ΔACD, and SS-OCT images.

基于扫描源光学相干断层扫描的光学生物计检测白色白内障伴晶状体内压升高。
目的:利用基于扫源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)的光学生物测量仪,确定白色白内障(WC)伴高晶状体内压(EWC)与正常晶状体内压(NWC)是否可以区分。研究设计:回顾性观察性研究方法:入选在岩手医科大学医院行超声乳化术和人工晶状体植入术的WC患者。通过手术录像,有/没有液化皮质渗漏或肿胀皮质膨出的WCs分别被分类为EWC和NWC。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、眼部合并症、各项参数以及SS-OCT图像上液化皮质的特征性表现。如果参数测量不正确,则使用SS-OCT图像进行重新测量。结果:48例wwc患者中26眼为EWC, 22眼为NWC。在晶状体厚度(LT)、前房深度(ACD)、ΔLT、ΔACD(分别为有WC眼与无WC眼之间的LT或ACD差异)以及EWC眼与NWC眼之间的年龄方面存在显著差异。ROC分析显示,LT、ΔLT、ΔACD的AUC值均大于0.970。LT需要在大约一半的WC中重新测量,而ACD则不需要。图像评价检测EWC的灵敏度为88.5%,特异性为90.9%。结论:基于SS-OCT的光学生物计可以通过LT、ΔLT、ΔACD和SS-OCT图像检测EWC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信