Research opportunities in precision oncology: perspectives on biospecimen and genomic data sharing from adults with cancer in Ireland.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shane O'Grady, Jessica C Ralston, Eadaoin McKiernan, Frances J Drummond, Jan Rynne, Derick Mitchell, Isabella Bray, William M Gallagher, Amanda Drury, Walter Kolch
{"title":"Research opportunities in precision oncology: perspectives on biospecimen and genomic data sharing from adults with cancer in Ireland.","authors":"Shane O'Grady, Jessica C Ralston, Eadaoin McKiernan, Frances J Drummond, Jan Rynne, Derick Mitchell, Isabella Bray, William M Gallagher, Amanda Drury, Walter Kolch","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04082-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although surveys of people living with cancer in other nations have generally found a high degree of willingness to donate to research services such as genomic databases and biobanks, results may vary between countries. Additional questions also remain surrounding issues such as preferred model of consent, reporting of findings and concerns surrounding potential commercial application of health data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was gathered from 176 adults living with and beyond cancer in Ireland over a 16-month period, utilising an online survey platform. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the survey cohort, with relationships between variables tested using the Spearman correlation or chi-square analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight percent of respondents had previously donated a biological sample to research, while all those who had not previously donated indicated they would do so if given the opportunity. There was a strong preference for total transparency with personal health data, with the vast majority wanting to know of any risk factors identified in their genome, even if these risks were not medically actionable. Respondents held a high degree of trust in both the clinical and scientific community, with most indicating that this played a major role in influencing their decision to donate. Finally, while most did not have issues with commercial involvement in the donation process, 26% did express some reservations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate a high degree of receptiveness to biological sample donation amongst people living with cancer in Ireland, suggesting that further efforts to recruit individuals could yield substantial improvements in sample donation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04082-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although surveys of people living with cancer in other nations have generally found a high degree of willingness to donate to research services such as genomic databases and biobanks, results may vary between countries. Additional questions also remain surrounding issues such as preferred model of consent, reporting of findings and concerns surrounding potential commercial application of health data.

Methods: Data was gathered from 176 adults living with and beyond cancer in Ireland over a 16-month period, utilising an online survey platform. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the survey cohort, with relationships between variables tested using the Spearman correlation or chi-square analysis.

Results: Twenty-eight percent of respondents had previously donated a biological sample to research, while all those who had not previously donated indicated they would do so if given the opportunity. There was a strong preference for total transparency with personal health data, with the vast majority wanting to know of any risk factors identified in their genome, even if these risks were not medically actionable. Respondents held a high degree of trust in both the clinical and scientific community, with most indicating that this played a major role in influencing their decision to donate. Finally, while most did not have issues with commercial involvement in the donation process, 26% did express some reservations.

Conclusion: Our results indicate a high degree of receptiveness to biological sample donation amongst people living with cancer in Ireland, suggesting that further efforts to recruit individuals could yield substantial improvements in sample donation rates.

在精确肿瘤学的研究机会:对生物标本和基因组数据共享的观点从成人癌症在爱尔兰。
背景:尽管对其他国家癌症患者的调查普遍发现,他们对基因组数据库和生物银行等研究服务的捐赠意愿很高,但结果可能因国家而异。其他问题还围绕着诸如首选的同意模式、调查结果报告以及对健康数据潜在商业应用的关切等问题。方法:利用在线调查平台,在16个月的时间里,从爱尔兰的176名患有癌症或没有癌症的成年人中收集数据。描述性统计用于描述调查队列的特征,变量之间的关系使用Spearman相关或卡方分析进行检验。结果:28%的受访者以前曾捐献过生物样本用于研究,而所有以前没有捐献过的人都表示,如果有机会,他们会这样做。人们强烈希望个人健康数据完全透明,绝大多数人希望知道他们基因组中确定的任何风险因素,即使这些风险在医学上不可行。受访者对临床和科学界都抱有高度信任,大多数人表示,这在影响他们捐赠决定方面发挥了重要作用。最后,虽然大多数人在捐赠过程中没有商业参与的问题,但26%的人表达了一些保留意见。结论:我们的研究结果表明,爱尔兰癌症患者对生物样本捐赠的接受程度很高,这表明进一步招募个人的努力可能会大大提高样本捐赠率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信