eHealth Applications Improve Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Junjie Huang, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Siu Hin Wong, Chung Yi Lo, Man Kin Yim, Martin C S Wong
{"title":"eHealth Applications Improve Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Junjie Huang, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Siu Hin Wong, Chung Yi Lo, Man Kin Yim, Martin C S Wong","doi":"10.2196/67761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The eHealth app introduced a chronic disease management module to enhance the efficiency of clinical consultations and facilitate self-health management. However, there was limited information on health outcomes after using the module.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the health outcomes of individuals who used the health management module of an individualized electronic application compared to those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 165 participants, with 82 participants assigned to the control group and 83 participants assigned to the intervention group. Randomization was done via a computer randomizer to evaluate the impact of the eHealth chronic disease management module installation on clinical outcomes such as blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), renal function tests, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio. Data were collected at baseline and at follow-up visits at 4 and 8 months. Student t tests and chi-square tests were performed to analyze the difference between the intervention and control groups and examined the potential impact of the use of the eHealth chronic disease management module on various health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 161 participants were included in the analysis, with an average age of 66.58 (SD 9.75) and 66.49 (SD 8.45) years in control and intervention group respectively. After 4 months, the intervention group showed better glycemic control, with significantly lower mean HbA1c levels (mean 6.76%, SD 0.64%) compared to the control group (mean 7.09%, SD 0.82%, P=.007). Also, more participants in intervention group achieved optimal HbA1c levels (n=58, 73.4%; P=.004) compared to the control group (n=36, 49.3%) in month 4. App usage had significantly decreased when comparing the usage after 4 months (mean 1.88 points, SD 0.81 points) and month 8 (mean 1.39 points, SD 0.72 points; P<.001). The results indicated better glycemic control for participants using the module in a relatively shorter period of time, and app adherence was the key for the continuous optimal glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the potential of the module for clinical application in patients with suboptimal glycemic control. The long-term benefit of the module may be affected by the compliance of participants to the module.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR2500108895; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=214865.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e67761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The eHealth app introduced a chronic disease management module to enhance the efficiency of clinical consultations and facilitate self-health management. However, there was limited information on health outcomes after using the module.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the health outcomes of individuals who used the health management module of an individualized electronic application compared to those who did not.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 165 participants, with 82 participants assigned to the control group and 83 participants assigned to the intervention group. Randomization was done via a computer randomizer to evaluate the impact of the eHealth chronic disease management module installation on clinical outcomes such as blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), renal function tests, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio. Data were collected at baseline and at follow-up visits at 4 and 8 months. Student t tests and chi-square tests were performed to analyze the difference between the intervention and control groups and examined the potential impact of the use of the eHealth chronic disease management module on various health outcomes.

Results: In total, 161 participants were included in the analysis, with an average age of 66.58 (SD 9.75) and 66.49 (SD 8.45) years in control and intervention group respectively. After 4 months, the intervention group showed better glycemic control, with significantly lower mean HbA1c levels (mean 6.76%, SD 0.64%) compared to the control group (mean 7.09%, SD 0.82%, P=.007). Also, more participants in intervention group achieved optimal HbA1c levels (n=58, 73.4%; P=.004) compared to the control group (n=36, 49.3%) in month 4. App usage had significantly decreased when comparing the usage after 4 months (mean 1.88 points, SD 0.81 points) and month 8 (mean 1.39 points, SD 0.72 points; P<.001). The results indicated better glycemic control for participants using the module in a relatively shorter period of time, and app adherence was the key for the continuous optimal glycemic control.

Conclusions: These findings support the potential of the module for clinical application in patients with suboptimal glycemic control. The long-term benefit of the module may be affected by the compliance of participants to the module.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR2500108895; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=214865.

电子健康应用改善糖尿病患者血糖控制:随机对照试验
背景:eHealth app引入慢性病管理模块,提高临床会诊效率,方便自我健康管理。然而,关于使用该模块后健康结果的信息有限。目的:本研究旨在检查使用个性化电子应用程序的健康管理模块的个体与未使用的个体的健康结果。方法:采用随机对照试验,共165人,其中对照组82人,干预组83人。通过计算机随机化器进行随机化,以评估eHealth慢性病管理模块安装对临床结果的影响,如血压、血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)、肾功能测试、估计肾小球滤过率和尿白蛋白/肌酐比。在基线和4个月和8个月的随访中收集数据。采用学生t检验和卡方检验来分析干预组和对照组之间的差异,并检验使用eHealth慢性病管理模块对各种健康结果的潜在影响。结果:共纳入研究对象161人,对照组平均年龄66.58岁(SD 9.75),干预组平均年龄66.49岁(SD 8.45)。4个月后,干预组血糖控制较好,平均HbA1c水平(平均6.76%,SD 0.64%)明显低于对照组(平均7.09%,SD 0.82%, P= 0.007)。干预组在第4个月达到最佳HbA1c水平的患者(n=58, 73.4%; P= 0.004)多于对照组(n=36, 49.3%)。与4个月后(平均1.88分,SD 0.81分)和8个月后(平均1.39分,SD 0.72分)的使用情况相比,App使用率显著下降。结论:这些发现支持该模块在血糖控制不理想患者的临床应用潜力。该模块的长期效益可能受到参与者对该模块的遵从性的影响。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2500108895;https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=214865。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信