Retrospective analysis of the analgosedative efficacy and safety of midazolam combined with fentanyl in mechanically ventilated neonates.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1647247
Fangfang Lin, Shuidi Lin, Wenhong Cai, Yanli Ren
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of the analgosedative efficacy and safety of midazolam combined with fentanyl in mechanically ventilated neonates.","authors":"Fangfang Lin, Shuidi Lin, Wenhong Cai, Yanli Ren","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1647247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the analgosedative efficacy and safety of the combination of midazolam and fentanyl with those of midazolam monotherapy in mechanically ventilated neonates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of mechanically ventilated patients in our neonatal intensive care unit from April 1, 2021 to December 1, 2024. After dividing patients into midazolam + fentanyl (M + F) and midazolam (M) groups according to their respective sedation/analgesia regimens, we conducted intergroup comparisons of pain scores, ventilator parameters, and vital signs 5 min pre-treatment and at post-treatment time points (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h). We also compared pre-and post-treatment (3 h, 24 h, 48 h) non-invasive hemodynamic parameters; adverse reactions; and discharge outcomes of the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 neonates were included, with 106 in the M + F group and 104 in the M group. N-PASS pain scores obtained 5 min pre-treatment were similar between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05); however, N-PASS scores were significantly lower in the M + F than in the M group at each post-treatment time point (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Ventilator parameters (MAP, FIO<sub>2</sub>) obtained 5 min pre-treatment were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05), but were significantly lower at each post-treatment time point (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) in the M + F group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Pre- and post-treatment (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) vital signs did not differ between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Pre-and post-treatment (3 h, 24 h, 48 h) non-invasive hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in adverse reactions or discharge outcomes (<i>P</i> > 0. 05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of midazolam and fentanyl relieved pain and reduced ventilator parameters more effectively than midazolam monotherapy, without increasing adverse reactions or worsening discharge outcomes among mechanically ventilated neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1647247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1647247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the analgosedative efficacy and safety of the combination of midazolam and fentanyl with those of midazolam monotherapy in mechanically ventilated neonates.

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of mechanically ventilated patients in our neonatal intensive care unit from April 1, 2021 to December 1, 2024. After dividing patients into midazolam + fentanyl (M + F) and midazolam (M) groups according to their respective sedation/analgesia regimens, we conducted intergroup comparisons of pain scores, ventilator parameters, and vital signs 5 min pre-treatment and at post-treatment time points (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h). We also compared pre-and post-treatment (3 h, 24 h, 48 h) non-invasive hemodynamic parameters; adverse reactions; and discharge outcomes of the two groups.

Results: A total of 210 neonates were included, with 106 in the M + F group and 104 in the M group. N-PASS pain scores obtained 5 min pre-treatment were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, N-PASS scores were significantly lower in the M + F than in the M group at each post-treatment time point (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) (all P < 0.05). Ventilator parameters (MAP, FIO2) obtained 5 min pre-treatment were similar (P > 0.05), but were significantly lower at each post-treatment time point (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) in the M + F group (all P < 0.05). Pre- and post-treatment (1 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) vital signs did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). Pre-and post-treatment (3 h, 24 h, 48 h) non-invasive hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in adverse reactions or discharge outcomes (P > 0. 05).

Conclusion: The combination of midazolam and fentanyl relieved pain and reduced ventilator parameters more effectively than midazolam monotherapy, without increasing adverse reactions or worsening discharge outcomes among mechanically ventilated neonates.

Abstract Image

咪达唑仑联合芬太尼对机械通气新生儿镇痛镇静效果及安全性的回顾性分析。
目的:比较咪达唑仑联合芬太尼与咪达唑仑单药治疗机械通气新生儿的镇痛镇静效果和安全性。材料与方法:对我院新生儿重症监护室2021年4月1日至2024年12月1日机械通气患者进行单中心回顾性分析。将患者根据镇静镇痛方案分为咪达唑仑+芬太尼(M + F)组和咪达唑仑(M)组,分别在治疗前5 min和治疗后时间点(1 h、3 h、12 h、24 h、48 h)进行组间疼痛评分、呼吸机参数和生命体征比较。我们还比较了治疗前后(3小时、24小时、48小时)的无创血流动力学参数;不良反应;以及两组的出院情况。结果:共纳入新生儿210例,其中M + F组106例,M组104例。两组治疗前5 min N-PASS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05);M + F组在治疗后各时间点(1 h、3 h、12 h、24 h、48 h)的N-PASS评分均显著低于M组(P < 0.05),而M + F组在治疗后各时间点(1 h、3 h、12 h、24 h、48 h)的N-PASS评分均显著低于M组(P < 0.05)。治疗前、治疗后(3 h、24 h、48 h)两组无创血流动力学参数差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间不良反应及出院情况差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。05)。结论:咪达唑仑联合芬太尼比咪达唑仑单药治疗更有效地缓解了机械通气新生儿的疼痛和降低了呼吸机参数,没有增加不良反应或恶化出院结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信