Effectiveness of Silica Coatings in Enhancing Resin Cement Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Laura C Lara-Hernández, Luis C Jiménez-Borrego, Nelly S Roa
{"title":"Effectiveness of Silica Coatings in Enhancing Resin Cement Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Laura C Lara-Hernández, Luis C Jiménez-Borrego, Nelly S Roa","doi":"10.3390/dj13090426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The use of zirconia-based restorations has increased in dentistry due to their aesthetics, high strength, and biocompatibility. However, achieving durable adhesion between resin cements and zirconia remains a challenge in restorative dentistry. Adhesive failures can lead to complications ranging from dentin hypersensitivity to the loss of the restored tooth. This review evaluates the impact of surface treatments based on silica coatings as a strategy to improve the adhesion of resin cements to zirconia. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. In vitro studies were included if they (1) evaluated silica-based coatings on zirconia surfaces; (2) measured bond strength at the zirconia-cement interface through shear tests (MPa) and reported failure type (adhesive, cohesive, mixed); (3) used ≥8 specimens per group; and (4) included an untreated zirconia control group. Data were extracted and compared for conditions before and after thermocycling in the studies that reported this procedure. <b>Results</b>: The average bond strength for silica-coated zirconia was 15 MPa without thermocycling and 11.97 MPa after thermocycling, regardless of the coating technique. These values were significantly higher than those of untreated zirconia (8.45 MPa and 6.41 MPa, respectively). Cohesive and mixed failures predominated in silica-treated groups, suggesting more effective adhesion compared to controls, which presented mainly adhesive failures. <b>Conclusions</b>: Silica coatings, especially when combined with adhesion promoters, MDP-based primers, significantly enhance the bond strength of resin cements to zirconia. This reduces the risk of secondary caries, sensitivity, restoration debonding, and potential tooth fractures. However, the effectiveness of these coatings varies depending on the technique used, suggesting the need to standardize protocols to optimize clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of zirconia-based restorations has increased in dentistry due to their aesthetics, high strength, and biocompatibility. However, achieving durable adhesion between resin cements and zirconia remains a challenge in restorative dentistry. Adhesive failures can lead to complications ranging from dentin hypersensitivity to the loss of the restored tooth. This review evaluates the impact of surface treatments based on silica coatings as a strategy to improve the adhesion of resin cements to zirconia. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. In vitro studies were included if they (1) evaluated silica-based coatings on zirconia surfaces; (2) measured bond strength at the zirconia-cement interface through shear tests (MPa) and reported failure type (adhesive, cohesive, mixed); (3) used ≥8 specimens per group; and (4) included an untreated zirconia control group. Data were extracted and compared for conditions before and after thermocycling in the studies that reported this procedure. Results: The average bond strength for silica-coated zirconia was 15 MPa without thermocycling and 11.97 MPa after thermocycling, regardless of the coating technique. These values were significantly higher than those of untreated zirconia (8.45 MPa and 6.41 MPa, respectively). Cohesive and mixed failures predominated in silica-treated groups, suggesting more effective adhesion compared to controls, which presented mainly adhesive failures. Conclusions: Silica coatings, especially when combined with adhesion promoters, MDP-based primers, significantly enhance the bond strength of resin cements to zirconia. This reduces the risk of secondary caries, sensitivity, restoration debonding, and potential tooth fractures. However, the effectiveness of these coatings varies depending on the technique used, suggesting the need to standardize protocols to optimize clinical outcomes.

二氧化硅涂层增强树脂水泥与氧化锆附着力的有效性:系统综述。
背景:由于其美观、高强度和生物相容性,氧化锆基修复体的使用在牙科中有所增加。然而,在修复牙科中,实现树脂水泥与氧化锆之间的持久粘附仍然是一个挑战。粘接失败可导致并发症,从牙本质过敏到修复的牙齿脱落。这篇综述评估了基于二氧化硅涂层的表面处理作为一种改善树脂水泥与氧化锆粘合的策略的影响。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。在Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed、EBSCO和ScienceDirect中进行了搜索。如果体外研究(1)评估氧化锆表面上的硅基涂层,则包括在内;(2)通过剪切试验测定了氧化锆-水泥界面的粘结强度(MPa)和报告的破坏类型(粘结、内聚、混合);(3)每组≥8个标本;(4)为未经氧化锆处理的对照组。数据被提取出来,并在报道这一程序的研究中比较了热循环前后的条件。结果:无论涂覆工艺如何,未热循环的氧化锆的平均结合强度为15 MPa,热循环后的平均结合强度为11.97 MPa。这些值显著高于未处理氧化锆(分别为8.45 MPa和6.41 MPa)。在二氧化硅处理组中,黏附和混合失效占主导地位,表明与主要表现为黏附失效的对照组相比,黏附更有效。结论:二氧化硅涂层,特别是当与粘结促进剂、mdp底漆结合使用时,可以显著提高树脂水泥与氧化锆的结合强度。这样可以减少继发性龋齿、敏感性、修复脱粘和潜在的牙齿骨折的风险。然而,这些涂层的有效性取决于所使用的技术,这表明需要标准化的方案来优化临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信