Crown-Root Ratio as a Predictive Morphometric Indicator in Mandibular First Molars with Occlusal Trauma and Periodontitis: A Radiographic and Clinical Modeling Study.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Lidya Irani Nainggolan, Bramma Kiswanjaya, Menik Priaminiarti, Sri Lelyati Chaidar Masulili, Hanna H Bachtiar-Iskandar, Yuniarti Soeroso, Pitu Wulandari, Eha Renwi Astuti, Akihiro Yoshihara
{"title":"Crown-Root Ratio as a Predictive Morphometric Indicator in Mandibular First Molars with Occlusal Trauma and Periodontitis: A Radiographic and Clinical Modeling Study.","authors":"Lidya Irani Nainggolan, Bramma Kiswanjaya, Menik Priaminiarti, Sri Lelyati Chaidar Masulili, Hanna H Bachtiar-Iskandar, Yuniarti Soeroso, Pitu Wulandari, Eha Renwi Astuti, Akihiro Yoshihara","doi":"10.3390/dj13090419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Trauma from occlusion (TFO) is a modifying factor in periodontal disease progression, yet its morphometric impact on mandibular molars remains underexplored. The crown-root ratio (CRR), traditionally used in prosthodontic prognosis, may also serve as a diagnostic marker for structural changes in periodontally compromised teeth. This study evaluated the relationship between crown and root dimensions and clinical/radiographic parameters in mandibular first molars with TFO and developed predictive models emphasizing the role of CRR. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cross-sectional study included 99 periodontitis patients clinically and radiographically diagnosed with TFO. Digitized periapical radiographs of mandibular first molars (tooth 36 or 46) were analyzed to measure clinical and radiographic CRR, crown and root length, tooth inclination, alveolar bone loss, and root morphology. Correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses identified predictors of crown and root length. <b>Results:</b> Males had significantly greater crown length (7.6 vs. 7.2 mm), root length (13.3 vs. 12.3 mm), and radiographic CRR (1.2 vs. 1.0) (<i>p</i> = 0.008). Clinical CRR showed a moderate positive correlation with crown length (<i>r</i> = 0.526) and a strong inverse correlation with root length (<i>r</i> = -0.735) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regression models revealed that clinical CRR, root length, and sex significantly predicted crown length (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.955), while CRR and crown length predicted root length (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.958). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrated that the clinical crown-root ratio (CRR) is a strong predictor of both crown and root lengths in mandibular first molars affected by trauma from occlusion (TFO) in periodontitis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Trauma from occlusion (TFO) is a modifying factor in periodontal disease progression, yet its morphometric impact on mandibular molars remains underexplored. The crown-root ratio (CRR), traditionally used in prosthodontic prognosis, may also serve as a diagnostic marker for structural changes in periodontally compromised teeth. This study evaluated the relationship between crown and root dimensions and clinical/radiographic parameters in mandibular first molars with TFO and developed predictive models emphasizing the role of CRR. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 99 periodontitis patients clinically and radiographically diagnosed with TFO. Digitized periapical radiographs of mandibular first molars (tooth 36 or 46) were analyzed to measure clinical and radiographic CRR, crown and root length, tooth inclination, alveolar bone loss, and root morphology. Correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses identified predictors of crown and root length. Results: Males had significantly greater crown length (7.6 vs. 7.2 mm), root length (13.3 vs. 12.3 mm), and radiographic CRR (1.2 vs. 1.0) (p = 0.008). Clinical CRR showed a moderate positive correlation with crown length (r = 0.526) and a strong inverse correlation with root length (r = -0.735) (p < 0.001). Regression models revealed that clinical CRR, root length, and sex significantly predicted crown length (R2 = 0.955), while CRR and crown length predicted root length (R2 = 0.958). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the clinical crown-root ratio (CRR) is a strong predictor of both crown and root lengths in mandibular first molars affected by trauma from occlusion (TFO) in periodontitis patients.

冠根比作为下颌第一磨牙咬合创伤和牙周炎的预测形态学指标:影像学和临床模型研究。
背景/目的:咬合创伤(TFO)是牙周病进展的一个调节因素,但其对下颌磨牙形态的影响尚不清楚。冠根比(CRR),传统上用于修复预后,也可以作为诊断牙周受损牙齿结构变化的标志物。本研究评估了下颌第一磨牙TFO患者的冠根尺寸与临床/影像学参数的关系,并建立了强调CRR作用的预测模型。方法:回顾性横断面研究纳入99例临床及影像学诊断为TFO的牙周炎患者。分析下颌第一磨牙(第36或46牙)的数字化根尖周x线片,测量临床和影像学CRR、牙冠和牙根长度、牙倾斜、牙槽骨丢失和牙根形态。相关分析和逐步多元回归分析确定了冠长和根长的预测因子。结果:男性的冠长(7.6 vs. 7.2 mm)、根长(13.3 vs. 12.3 mm)和放射成像CRR (1.2 vs. 1.0)显著大于男性(p = 0.008)。临床CRR与冠长呈中度正相关(r = 0.526),与根长呈强负相关(r = -0.735) (p < 0.001)。回归模型显示,临床CRR、根长和性别对冠长有显著预测作用(R2 = 0.955), CRR和冠长对根长有显著预测作用(R2 = 0.958)。结论:本研究表明,临床冠根比(CRR)是牙周炎患者下颌第一磨牙牙冠和牙根长度的一个强有力的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信