Viktor Savov, Stefan Peev, Ralitsa Yotsova, Varvara-Velika Rogova
{"title":"Influence of SLM-, SLS-, and DMLS-Manufactured Titanium Meshes on Bone Gain Parameters and Complications: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Viktor Savov, Stefan Peev, Ralitsa Yotsova, Varvara-Velika Rogova","doi":"10.3390/dj13090387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Guided bone regeneration one of the most widely used techniques, relies on combining bone graft material with barrier membranes or meshes. The choice of the mesh material depends on the specific clinical situation. Among the available options, titanium membranes are recognized as one of the most effective in dental implantology. The latter can be categorized into two groups: commercial and individualized. Advancements in additive manufacturing make customized titanium meshes an attractive option for bone regeneration. Customized titanium meshes can be manufactured using three main methods: selective laser sintering (SLS), selective laser melting (SLM), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). This review aims to provide information about the differences between the production process and the clinical outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: This systematic review was conducted by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Relevant articles were sought out in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases. <b>Results</b>: A total of ten articles were included and thoroughly reviewed. The type of bone graft used, the manufacturing technique, the amount of bone gain, the healing time, and the intraoperative and postoperative complications are discussed. <b>Conclusions</b>: All the relevant studies demonstrated good and predictable results using augmentation with individualized titanium meshes manufactured via SLS, SLM, or DMLS methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Guided bone regeneration one of the most widely used techniques, relies on combining bone graft material with barrier membranes or meshes. The choice of the mesh material depends on the specific clinical situation. Among the available options, titanium membranes are recognized as one of the most effective in dental implantology. The latter can be categorized into two groups: commercial and individualized. Advancements in additive manufacturing make customized titanium meshes an attractive option for bone regeneration. Customized titanium meshes can be manufactured using three main methods: selective laser sintering (SLS), selective laser melting (SLM), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). This review aims to provide information about the differences between the production process and the clinical outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was conducted by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Relevant articles were sought out in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Results: A total of ten articles were included and thoroughly reviewed. The type of bone graft used, the manufacturing technique, the amount of bone gain, the healing time, and the intraoperative and postoperative complications are discussed. Conclusions: All the relevant studies demonstrated good and predictable results using augmentation with individualized titanium meshes manufactured via SLS, SLM, or DMLS methods.
背景/目的:引导骨再生是应用最广泛的技术之一,它依赖于骨移植材料与屏障膜或网片的结合。补片材料的选择取决于具体的临床情况。在可用的选择中,钛膜被认为是最有效的牙科种植之一。后者可分为两类:商业和个性化。增材制造的进步使定制钛网成为骨再生的一个有吸引力的选择。定制钛网的制造主要有三种方法:选择性激光烧结(SLS)、选择性激光熔化(SLM)和直接金属激光烧结(DMLS)。本综述旨在提供有关生产过程和临床结果之间差异的信息。方法:本系统评价采用系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)进行。在Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus数据库中找到了相关文章。结果:共纳入10篇文章并进行了全面的综述。本文讨论了骨移植的类型、制造技术、骨增重量、愈合时间以及术中和术后并发症。结论:所有相关研究都表明,通过SLS、SLM或DMLS方法制造的个性化钛网增强效果良好且可预测。