Is the patients' fear of cancer the main barrier to prescribing menopausal hormone therapy?

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Isabella Melo Pompei, Sabrina Lara Abonizio Magdalena, Vivien Suemi Arimura, Rogério Bonassi Machado, César Eduardo Fernandes, Rossella Elena Nappi, Luciano Melo Pompei
{"title":"Is the patients' fear of cancer the main barrier to prescribing menopausal hormone therapy?","authors":"Isabella Melo Pompei, Sabrina Lara Abonizio Magdalena, Vivien Suemi Arimura, Rogério Bonassi Machado, César Eduardo Fernandes, Rossella Elena Nappi, Luciano Melo Pompei","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2025.2560327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for relieving menopausal symptoms. However, many women avoid this therapy due to fear, and in Brazil numerous cities lack access to this treatment in the public health system. This study aimed to investigate prescribing habits regarding MHT among gynecologist-obstetricians in the Brazilian public versus private health systems, and to identify the main barriers to its use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a quantitative approach. Gynecologist-obstetricians from across Brazil were invited to complete a structured electronic questionnaire assessing their prescribing practices in both the public and private health sectors.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 433 valid responses were analyzed. Among them, 51.5% of participants reported providing care to climacteric patients in the public health system, with 46.2% working in both sectors. Among physicians practicing in both settings, 76.5% reported prescribing MHT more frequently in the private sector. The main barriers to MHT prescription in the public system were treatment cost (68.2%) and lack of availability of free medication (61.4%), while in the private system the predominant barriers were fear of therapy-related risks (93.6%), especially cancer. Only 27.8% reported free access to MHT in their cities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that MHT prescribing practices in Brazil are still significantly influenced by structural barriers in the public sector and by negative perceptions in the private sector. Interventions aimed at expanding access and educating both physicians and patients are essential to ensure safe and equitable use of MHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2560327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for relieving menopausal symptoms. However, many women avoid this therapy due to fear, and in Brazil numerous cities lack access to this treatment in the public health system. This study aimed to investigate prescribing habits regarding MHT among gynecologist-obstetricians in the Brazilian public versus private health systems, and to identify the main barriers to its use.

Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a quantitative approach. Gynecologist-obstetricians from across Brazil were invited to complete a structured electronic questionnaire assessing their prescribing practices in both the public and private health sectors.

Result: A total of 433 valid responses were analyzed. Among them, 51.5% of participants reported providing care to climacteric patients in the public health system, with 46.2% working in both sectors. Among physicians practicing in both settings, 76.5% reported prescribing MHT more frequently in the private sector. The main barriers to MHT prescription in the public system were treatment cost (68.2%) and lack of availability of free medication (61.4%), while in the private system the predominant barriers were fear of therapy-related risks (93.6%), especially cancer. Only 27.8% reported free access to MHT in their cities.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that MHT prescribing practices in Brazil are still significantly influenced by structural barriers in the public sector and by negative perceptions in the private sector. Interventions aimed at expanding access and educating both physicians and patients are essential to ensure safe and equitable use of MHT.

患者对癌症的恐惧是绝经期激素治疗的主要障碍吗?
目的:绝经期激素治疗(MHT)是缓解更年期症状最有效的治疗方法。然而,许多妇女由于害怕而避免这种治疗,在巴西的许多城市,公共卫生系统无法获得这种治疗。本研究旨在调查巴西公共卫生系统与私人卫生系统中妇产科医生关于MHT的处方习惯,并确定其使用的主要障碍。方法:采用定量方法进行描述性横断面研究。来自巴西各地的妇产科医生被邀请完成一份结构化的电子问卷,评估他们在公共和私营卫生部门的处方做法。结果:共分析有效问卷433份。其中,51.5%的参与者报告在公共卫生系统为更年期患者提供护理,46.2%的参与者在两个部门都工作。在这两种环境中执业的医生中,76.5%的人报告在私营部门更频繁地开MHT处方。在公立医疗系统中,MHT处方的主要障碍是治疗费用(68.2%)和缺乏免费药物(61.4%),而在私立医疗系统中,主要障碍是对治疗相关风险的恐惧(93.6%),尤其是癌症。只有27.8%的人报告他们所在城市的MHT是免费的。结论:研究结果表明,巴西的MHT处方做法仍然受到公共部门结构性壁垒和私营部门负面看法的显著影响。旨在扩大可及性并对医生和患者进行教育的干预措施对于确保安全、公平地使用卫生保健医疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climacteric
Climacteric 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信