Safety of Combination TARE and SBRT in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Literature & Single-Center Case Series.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Bahareh Gholami, Ali Afrasiabi, Andrew M Moon, Ted K Yanagihara, Hui Wang, Sandra Gad, Alex Villalobos, David M Mauro, Hyeon Yu, Johannes L du Pisanie, Nima Kokabi
{"title":"Safety of Combination TARE and SBRT in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Literature & Single-Center Case Series.","authors":"Bahareh Gholami, Ali Afrasiabi, Andrew M Moon, Ted K Yanagihara, Hui Wang, Sandra Gad, Alex Villalobos, David M Mauro, Hyeon Yu, Johannes L du Pisanie, Nima Kokabi","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32090487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer. At the time of diagnosis, many HCC patients are not candidates for surgical resection and are considered for other locoregional therapies, including transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To date only a few studies have explored the safety and efficacy of combining TARE and SBRT. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate it. Patients who received both SBRT and TARE from 2016 to 2024 were retrospectively evaluated for treatment-related toxicity based on criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v4.0). Treatment response was evaluated by modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (m-RECIST). We identified 12 patients with median age of 66.5 (range: 40, 87) and median follow up of 12 months. The median time between TARE and SBRT was 6.5 months (range: 1.5 to 24). Following the second treatment, ALBI grade remined the same among all patients at 3-month post treatment compared to baseline. Baseline CP was A among all patients and remained unchanged during follow-up and no higher than grade 3 clinical or biochemical toxicity was seen. The objective response rate (ORR) among patients receiving treatment to the same lesion was 100%. The combination treatment was consistent with prior studies in which the combination of TARE and SBRT has been shown to have good local control with few cases of grade 3 toxicity. Our study demonstrates that treatment with TARE and SBRT was safe and effective among our small sample of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer. At the time of diagnosis, many HCC patients are not candidates for surgical resection and are considered for other locoregional therapies, including transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To date only a few studies have explored the safety and efficacy of combining TARE and SBRT. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate it. Patients who received both SBRT and TARE from 2016 to 2024 were retrospectively evaluated for treatment-related toxicity based on criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v4.0). Treatment response was evaluated by modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (m-RECIST). We identified 12 patients with median age of 66.5 (range: 40, 87) and median follow up of 12 months. The median time between TARE and SBRT was 6.5 months (range: 1.5 to 24). Following the second treatment, ALBI grade remined the same among all patients at 3-month post treatment compared to baseline. Baseline CP was A among all patients and remained unchanged during follow-up and no higher than grade 3 clinical or biochemical toxicity was seen. The objective response rate (ORR) among patients receiving treatment to the same lesion was 100%. The combination treatment was consistent with prior studies in which the combination of TARE and SBRT has been shown to have good local control with few cases of grade 3 toxicity. Our study demonstrates that treatment with TARE and SBRT was safe and effective among our small sample of patients.

TARE联合SBRT治疗肝细胞癌的安全性:文献综述及单中心病例系列。
肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的原发性肝癌。在诊断时,许多HCC患者不适合手术切除,而考虑采用其他局部治疗,包括经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)和立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)。迄今为止,只有少数研究探讨了TARE和SBRT联合使用的安全性和有效性。因此,我们打算对其进行评估。根据不良事件标准(CTCAE v4.0),回顾性评估2016年至2024年同时接受SBRT和TARE的患者的治疗相关毒性。采用改良的实体瘤反应评价标准(m-RECIST)评价治疗反应。我们确定了12例患者,中位年龄为66.5岁(范围:40岁,87岁),中位随访时间为12个月。TARE和SBRT之间的中位时间为6.5个月(范围:1.5至24个月)。在第二次治疗后,与基线相比,治疗后3个月所有患者的ALBI等级保持不变。所有患者的基线CP均为A,随访期间保持不变,未见高于3级的临床或生化毒性。同一病灶接受治疗的患者的客观有效率(ORR)为100%。联合治疗与先前的研究一致,在这些研究中,TARE和SBRT联合治疗已被证明具有良好的局部控制效果,很少有3级毒性病例。我们的研究表明,在我们的小样本患者中,使用TARE和SBRT治疗是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信