Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Scoping Review of Applications, Challenges, and Gaps.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohammed El-Hakim, Robert Anthonappa, Amr Fawzy
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Scoping Review of Applications, Challenges, and Gaps.","authors":"Mohammed El-Hakim, Robert Anthonappa, Amr Fawzy","doi":"10.3390/dj13090384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This scoping review aims to map existing AI applications in dental education, in student learning, assessment, and diagnostic training, identifying key limitations and challenges. <b>Methods:</b> Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases were searched in March 2025 using combinations of the following search words: \"dental education,\" \"artificial intelligence,\" \"machine learning,\" and \"student assessment\". Inclusion was limited to English-language empirical studies focused on dental student education. Of 547 identified studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria. They were categorized into four domains: (1) Preclinical Training, (2) AI in Clinical, Diagnostic Training, and Radiographic Interpretation, (3) AI as an Assessment Tool and Feedback System, and (4) AI in Content Generation for Dental Education. <b>Results:</b> AI has positively influenced various domains, enhancing procedural accuracy, diagnostic confidence, assessment efficiency, and content delivery. However, it struggles to assess nuanced competencies like dexterity and clinical judgment. The challenges faced include disparate definitions of AI, ethical and privacy concerns, model variability, and a deficiency of dental leadership in AI development. At present, most tools are engineered by computer scientists and may not align effectively with the priorities of dental education. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI holds significant potential to enhance dental education outcomes. However, to guarantee its relevance and reliability, it requires standard frameworks, ethical oversight, and clinician-led development. Future research should concentrate on implementing real-time AI-driven feedback systems during preclinical training and advocate for more precise definitions to support consistent AI application and evaluation in dental education.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This scoping review aims to map existing AI applications in dental education, in student learning, assessment, and diagnostic training, identifying key limitations and challenges. Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases were searched in March 2025 using combinations of the following search words: "dental education," "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," and "student assessment". Inclusion was limited to English-language empirical studies focused on dental student education. Of 547 identified studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria. They were categorized into four domains: (1) Preclinical Training, (2) AI in Clinical, Diagnostic Training, and Radiographic Interpretation, (3) AI as an Assessment Tool and Feedback System, and (4) AI in Content Generation for Dental Education. Results: AI has positively influenced various domains, enhancing procedural accuracy, diagnostic confidence, assessment efficiency, and content delivery. However, it struggles to assess nuanced competencies like dexterity and clinical judgment. The challenges faced include disparate definitions of AI, ethical and privacy concerns, model variability, and a deficiency of dental leadership in AI development. At present, most tools are engineered by computer scientists and may not align effectively with the priorities of dental education. Conclusions: AI holds significant potential to enhance dental education outcomes. However, to guarantee its relevance and reliability, it requires standard frameworks, ethical oversight, and clinician-led development. Future research should concentrate on implementing real-time AI-driven feedback systems during preclinical training and advocate for more precise definitions to support consistent AI application and evaluation in dental education.

人工智能在牙科教育中的应用、挑战和差距。
背景/目的:本综述旨在绘制现有的人工智能在牙科教育、学生学习、评估和诊断培训中的应用,确定关键的局限性和挑战。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley框架和PRISMA-ScR指南,于2025年3月使用以下搜索词组合检索6个数据库:“牙科教育”、“人工智能”、“机器学习”和“学生评估”。纳入仅限于关注牙科学生教育的英语实证研究。在547项确定的研究中,17项符合纳入标准。它们被分为四个领域:(1)临床前培训;(2)临床、诊断培训和放射学解释中的人工智能;(3)作为评估工具和反馈系统的人工智能;(4)牙科教育内容生成中的人工智能。结果:人工智能对各个领域产生了积极影响,提高了程序准确性、诊断信心、评估效率和内容交付。然而,它很难评估诸如灵活性和临床判断等细微的能力。面临的挑战包括人工智能的不同定义、道德和隐私问题、模型可变性以及人工智能开发中缺乏牙科领导力。目前,大多数工具都是由计算机科学家设计的,可能无法有效地与牙科教育的优先事项保持一致。结论:人工智能在提高牙科教育成果方面具有显著的潜力。然而,为了保证其相关性和可靠性,它需要标准框架、伦理监督和临床医生主导的发展。未来的研究应侧重于在临床前培训中实施实时人工智能驱动的反馈系统,并倡导更精确的定义,以支持人工智能在牙科教育中的一致应用和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信