William Thomas, Siddharth Kulkarni, Aleksandra Ilina, Matthew Reed, Brian W Pogue
{"title":"Oxygen concentration alters ROS yields with minor plasmid DNA damage change at Ultra High Dose Rate.","authors":"William Thomas, Siddharth Kulkarni, Aleksandra Ilina, Matthew Reed, Brian W Pogue","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy has become a large area of research due to observed normal tissue sparing without sacrificing tumor control, termed the FLASH effect. The purpose of this study was to compare reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA damage across various O2 levels at UHDR and conventional dose rates (CDR) in solutions without repair enzymes and radical scavengers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Solution assays of both ROS and DNA damage assessed dose rate and oxygen dependent (0-20% O2) changes between UHDR and CDR from an IntraOp Mobetron. For ROS reporters Amplex UltraRed (H2O2), and CellROX Deep Red (non-H2O2) were quantified via intensity per unit dose. DNA damage assayed plasmid pBR322 gel electrophoresis, to differentiate both single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ROS assays, a significant reduction was noted from CDR to UHDR across all measured oxygen levels. The generation of H2O2 decreased when departing from physiologically relevant oxygen levels (1-5%), with generation 30-40% lower at UHDR. The DNA damage assay showed no trends in the SSB or DSB values with O2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Examination of trends between ROS and DNA damage from factors such as oxygen can help elucidate FLASH mechanisms. The H2O2 yield has maximum yield at physiological oxygenation levels (1-5%), and UHDR further diminishes yield. In DNA damage no trend was observed. It is possible that these mechanisms have underlying effects on the FLASH effect in vivo.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study is the first to directly compare radiation chemistry differences caused by UHDR to biologically relevant DNA damage in identical solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy has become a large area of research due to observed normal tissue sparing without sacrificing tumor control, termed the FLASH effect. The purpose of this study was to compare reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA damage across various O2 levels at UHDR and conventional dose rates (CDR) in solutions without repair enzymes and radical scavengers.
Methods: Solution assays of both ROS and DNA damage assessed dose rate and oxygen dependent (0-20% O2) changes between UHDR and CDR from an IntraOp Mobetron. For ROS reporters Amplex UltraRed (H2O2), and CellROX Deep Red (non-H2O2) were quantified via intensity per unit dose. DNA damage assayed plasmid pBR322 gel electrophoresis, to differentiate both single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB).
Results: For ROS assays, a significant reduction was noted from CDR to UHDR across all measured oxygen levels. The generation of H2O2 decreased when departing from physiologically relevant oxygen levels (1-5%), with generation 30-40% lower at UHDR. The DNA damage assay showed no trends in the SSB or DSB values with O2.
Conclusion: Examination of trends between ROS and DNA damage from factors such as oxygen can help elucidate FLASH mechanisms. The H2O2 yield has maximum yield at physiological oxygenation levels (1-5%), and UHDR further diminishes yield. In DNA damage no trend was observed. It is possible that these mechanisms have underlying effects on the FLASH effect in vivo.
Advances in knowledge: This study is the first to directly compare radiation chemistry differences caused by UHDR to biologically relevant DNA damage in identical solutions.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option