Evaluation of acridine derivatives as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Cytotoxicity, molecular interactions, and neuroprotective potential in AD

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
E. Joel Mart, C. Ronald Darwin
{"title":"Evaluation of acridine derivatives as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Cytotoxicity, molecular interactions, and neuroprotective potential in AD","authors":"E. Joel Mart,&nbsp;C. Ronald Darwin","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration, memory impairment, and neuroinflammation. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) represents a critical therapeutic target due to its role in acetylcholine regulation and amyloid-beta aggregation. This study evaluated five synthesized acridine derivatives (AAM7, AAM5, AC8, AC6, AM1) as potential AChE inhibitors through molecular docking, dynamics simulations, ADMET profiling, and cytotoxicity assessment using SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Molecular docking revealed AAM7 exhibited the highest binding affinity (-10.6 kcal/mol) to AChE, followed by AAM5, AC6, and AC8 (each −10.2 kcal/mol), while AM1 showed the lowest affinity (-9.1 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed AAM7's stable protein-ligand interactions with consistent hydrogen bonding (&gt;70 % trajectory occupancy) and π-π stacking with key residues Tyr124, Asp74, Ser125, and Trp86. ADMET analysis demonstrated favorable CNS penetration for all compounds, with AAM7 showing optimal drug-like properties (MW: 383.49 g/mol, LogP: 4.65, TPSA: 45.23 Ų) despite moderate solubility concerns. Cytotoxicity studies revealed AC6 as the most potent compound (IC₅₀: 135.56 μg/ml), followed by AM1 (IC₅₀: 202.36 μg/ml), while AAM7 demonstrated minimal cytotoxicity (IC₅₀: 394.02 μg/ml), indicating superior safety profile. Network analysis identified AChE as a central hub protein in neurodegeneration pathways. These findings establish AAM7 as a promising lead compound for AD therapy, combining strong AChE binding affinity with favorable safety characteristics, warranting further optimization for clinical development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 115842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825004292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration, memory impairment, and neuroinflammation. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) represents a critical therapeutic target due to its role in acetylcholine regulation and amyloid-beta aggregation. This study evaluated five synthesized acridine derivatives (AAM7, AAM5, AC8, AC6, AM1) as potential AChE inhibitors through molecular docking, dynamics simulations, ADMET profiling, and cytotoxicity assessment using SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Molecular docking revealed AAM7 exhibited the highest binding affinity (-10.6 kcal/mol) to AChE, followed by AAM5, AC6, and AC8 (each −10.2 kcal/mol), while AM1 showed the lowest affinity (-9.1 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed AAM7's stable protein-ligand interactions with consistent hydrogen bonding (>70 % trajectory occupancy) and π-π stacking with key residues Tyr124, Asp74, Ser125, and Trp86. ADMET analysis demonstrated favorable CNS penetration for all compounds, with AAM7 showing optimal drug-like properties (MW: 383.49 g/mol, LogP: 4.65, TPSA: 45.23 Ų) despite moderate solubility concerns. Cytotoxicity studies revealed AC6 as the most potent compound (IC₅₀: 135.56 μg/ml), followed by AM1 (IC₅₀: 202.36 μg/ml), while AAM7 demonstrated minimal cytotoxicity (IC₅₀: 394.02 μg/ml), indicating superior safety profile. Network analysis identified AChE as a central hub protein in neurodegeneration pathways. These findings establish AAM7 as a promising lead compound for AD therapy, combining strong AChE binding affinity with favorable safety characteristics, warranting further optimization for clinical development.
吖啶衍生物作为乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂的评价:AD的细胞毒性、分子相互作用和神经保护潜力。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)以进行性神经变性、记忆障碍和神经炎症为特征。乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)由于其在乙酰胆碱调节和淀粉样蛋白聚集中的作用而成为一个关键的治疗靶点。本研究利用SH-SY5Y神经母细胞瘤细胞,通过分子对接、动力学模拟、ADMET谱分析和细胞毒性评估,对5种合成的吖啶衍生物(AAM7、AAM5、AC8、AC6、AM1)作为AChE抑制剂进行了评价。分子对接结果显示,AAM7对AChE的结合亲和力最高(-10.6kcal/mol),其次是AAM5、AC6和AC8(均为-10.2kcal/mol), AM1的亲和力最低(-9.1kcal/mol)。分子动力学模拟证实了AAM7与关键残基Tyr124、Asp74、Ser125和Trp86的稳定的蛋白质-配体相互作用,具有一致的氢键(>70%轨迹占用)和π-π堆叠。ADMET分析表明,所有化合物都具有良好的CNS穿透性,尽管存在中等溶解度问题,但AAM7表现出最佳的类药物性质(MW: 383.49g/mol, LogP: 4.65, TPSA: 45.23Ų)。细胞毒性研究显示,AC6是最有效的化合物(IC₅₀:135.56μg/ml),其次是AM1 (IC₅₀:202.36μg/ml),而AAM7表现出最小的细胞毒性(IC₅₀:394.04 μg/ml),表明具有优越的安全性。网络分析发现AChE是神经退行性通路中的中枢蛋白。这些发现表明AAM7是一种很有前景的治疗AD的先导化合物,具有很强的AChE结合亲和力和良好的安全性,值得进一步优化用于临床开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信