Preferences for HIV prevention conditional cash transfers among Black/African American and Latinx cisgender MSM in Los Angeles.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
AIDS Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000004361
Corrina Moucheraud, Dillon Trujillo, Zachary Wagner, Wendy Garland, Terry Smith, Risa M Hoffman, Raphael J Landovitz
{"title":"Preferences for HIV prevention conditional cash transfers among Black/African American and Latinx cisgender MSM in Los Angeles.","authors":"Corrina Moucheraud, Dillon Trujillo, Zachary Wagner, Wendy Garland, Terry Smith, Risa M Hoffman, Raphael J Landovitz","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Los Angeles, cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) - particularly Black/African American and Latinx individuals - are a high-priority population for new HIV prevention interventions. Incentive programs that pay people for engaging in healthy behaviors, also known as \"conditional cash transfers\" (CCTs), are a promising strategy, but there is little evidence about their use in Black/African American and Latinx cisgender MSM.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We surveyed 133 cisgender MSM who identified as Black/African American or Latinx and included a discrete choice experiment to elicit their preferences for CCTs to incentivize preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use and, separately, HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings suggest that respondents preferred more frequent payments of higher monetary value (e.g., a 35.2 percentage point increased probability of choosing a PrEP use CCT with $1200 versus $300 payment, and a 49.7 percentage point increased probability of choosing an HIV testing CCT with $1200 versus $300 payment). Additionally, respondents showed a preference for receiving CCT payments in cash over gift card payments (a 9.4 percentage point increased preference in the PrEP use CCT, and an 11 percentage point increased preference in the HIV testing CCT), particularly among those who were unemployed. Younger respondents had a stronger preference for more frequent payments. Higher monetary amounts were more strongly preferred by those with greater educational attainment and those who were employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preimplementation research highlights important, and heterogeneous, preferences in the design details of a HIV prevention CCT for Black/African American and Latinx cisgender MSM in Los Angeles.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In Los Angeles, cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) - particularly Black/African American and Latinx individuals - are a high-priority population for new HIV prevention interventions. Incentive programs that pay people for engaging in healthy behaviors, also known as "conditional cash transfers" (CCTs), are a promising strategy, but there is little evidence about their use in Black/African American and Latinx cisgender MSM.

Design and methods: We surveyed 133 cisgender MSM who identified as Black/African American or Latinx and included a discrete choice experiment to elicit their preferences for CCTs to incentivize preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use and, separately, HIV testing.

Results: Our findings suggest that respondents preferred more frequent payments of higher monetary value (e.g., a 35.2 percentage point increased probability of choosing a PrEP use CCT with $1200 versus $300 payment, and a 49.7 percentage point increased probability of choosing an HIV testing CCT with $1200 versus $300 payment). Additionally, respondents showed a preference for receiving CCT payments in cash over gift card payments (a 9.4 percentage point increased preference in the PrEP use CCT, and an 11 percentage point increased preference in the HIV testing CCT), particularly among those who were unemployed. Younger respondents had a stronger preference for more frequent payments. Higher monetary amounts were more strongly preferred by those with greater educational attainment and those who were employed.

Conclusions: This preimplementation research highlights important, and heterogeneous, preferences in the design details of a HIV prevention CCT for Black/African American and Latinx cisgender MSM in Los Angeles.

洛杉矶黑人/非裔美国人和拉丁裔男同性恋者对艾滋病毒预防有条件现金转移的偏好。
目的:在洛杉矶,男男性行为者(MSM)——特别是黑人/非裔美国人和拉丁裔个体——是新的艾滋病毒预防干预措施的重点人群。奖励人们参与健康行为的激励计划,也被称为“有条件现金转移”(cct),是一个很有前途的策略,但很少有证据表明它们在黑人/非裔美国人和拉丁裔无性别男同性恋者中的应用。设计和方法:我们调查了133名被确定为黑人/非洲裔美国人或拉丁裔的顺性男同性恋者,并包括一个离散选择实验,以引出他们对有条件现金转移治疗的偏好,以激励暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用,以及单独的HIV检测。结果:我们的研究结果表明,受访者更倾向于更频繁地支付更高的货币价值(例如,与支付300美元相比,选择1200美元的PrEP使用CCT的可能性增加了35.2个百分点,选择1200美元的HIV检测CCT的可能性增加了49.7个百分点)。此外,受访者更倾向于接受现金有条件现金支付,而不是礼品卡支付(对PrEP使用有条件现金支付的偏好增加了9.4个百分点,对艾滋病毒检测有条件现金支付的偏好增加了11个百分点),特别是在失业者中。年轻的受访者更倾向于更频繁地付款。那些受教育程度较高和有工作的人更倾向于更高的金钱收入。结论:这项实施前研究突出了洛杉矶黑人/非裔美国人和拉丁裔顺性男同性恋者艾滋病预防CCT设计细节中的重要和异质偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS
AIDS 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
478
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信