Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation of consensus-based recommendations for the management of very old people in intensive care.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Richard S Bourne, Laura Alberto, Nathan E Brummel, Bas de Groot, Dylan W De Lange, Paul Elbers, Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk, Hans Flaatten, Yonathan Freund, Alessandro Galazzi, Ana Garcia-Martinez, Bertrand Guidet, Iva Holmerová, Jeremy M Jacobs, Gavin M Joynt, Susannah Leaver, Marc Leone, Bairbre McNicholas, David McWilliams, Victoria Metaxa, Christian H Nickel, Daniele Poole, Chiara Robba, Kevin Roedl, Marc Romain, Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Sviri Sigal, Wojciech Szczeklik, Hélène Vallet, James van Oppen, Christian Jung, Michael Beil
{"title":"Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation of consensus-based recommendations for the management of very old people in intensive care.","authors":"Richard S Bourne, Laura Alberto, Nathan E Brummel, Bas de Groot, Dylan W De Lange, Paul Elbers, Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk, Hans Flaatten, Yonathan Freund, Alessandro Galazzi, Ana Garcia-Martinez, Bertrand Guidet, Iva Holmerová, Jeremy M Jacobs, Gavin M Joynt, Susannah Leaver, Marc Leone, Bairbre McNicholas, David McWilliams, Victoria Metaxa, Christian H Nickel, Daniele Poole, Chiara Robba, Kevin Roedl, Marc Romain, Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Sviri Sigal, Wojciech Szczeklik, Hélène Vallet, James van Oppen, Christian Jung, Michael Beil","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent consensus-based recommendations on the management of people aged ≥80 years in intensive care units (ICUs) were developed to guide the management of quality care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand perceived barriers and facilitators to consensus-based recommendations to support their implementation into multi-professional and disciplinary clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of comments made by an international multiprofessional group of intensive care, emergency and geriatric medicine specialists in the Delphi consensus on the management of people aged ≥80 years in ICUs. Barrier and facilitators were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Care statement comments were provided by 99 of the 124 (79.8%) participants completing the Delphi first round; primarily identifying barriers (239/258; 92.6%). Most participants identified limitations in the environmental context and resources within the healthcare system (152, 63.6%); predominantly limitations in resources/material resources, with staffing (60, 25.1%), and beds or facilities (30, 12.6%) concerns. Potentially modifiable domains focused on inadequate knowledge (25, 10.5%), beliefs about consequences (18, 7.5%), care goals (16, 6.7%) and social/professional role and identity (16, 6.7%). Facilitators focused on improving staff knowledge, particularly amongst geriatric medicine and intensive care medicine specialities, and environmental context and resources (both 8, 42.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The environmental context and resources domain was the most common barrier identified. Behaviour change opportunities are centred on the domains knowledge, beliefs about consequences, goals and social/professional role and identity. Linked behaviour change techniques can be identified and developed according to local healthcare context to support implementation of care recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent consensus-based recommendations on the management of people aged ≥80 years in intensive care units (ICUs) were developed to guide the management of quality care.

Objective: To understand perceived barriers and facilitators to consensus-based recommendations to support their implementation into multi-professional and disciplinary clinical practice.

Methods: Analysis of comments made by an international multiprofessional group of intensive care, emergency and geriatric medicine specialists in the Delphi consensus on the management of people aged ≥80 years in ICUs. Barrier and facilitators were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results: Care statement comments were provided by 99 of the 124 (79.8%) participants completing the Delphi first round; primarily identifying barriers (239/258; 92.6%). Most participants identified limitations in the environmental context and resources within the healthcare system (152, 63.6%); predominantly limitations in resources/material resources, with staffing (60, 25.1%), and beds or facilities (30, 12.6%) concerns. Potentially modifiable domains focused on inadequate knowledge (25, 10.5%), beliefs about consequences (18, 7.5%), care goals (16, 6.7%) and social/professional role and identity (16, 6.7%). Facilitators focused on improving staff knowledge, particularly amongst geriatric medicine and intensive care medicine specialities, and environmental context and resources (both 8, 42.1%).

Conclusions: The environmental context and resources domain was the most common barrier identified. Behaviour change opportunities are centred on the domains knowledge, beliefs about consequences, goals and social/professional role and identity. Linked behaviour change techniques can be identified and developed according to local healthcare context to support implementation of care recommendations.

了解实施基于共识的重症监护高龄患者管理建议的障碍和促进因素。
背景:最近针对≥80岁高龄患者在重症监护病房(icu)的管理提出了基于共识的建议,以指导质量护理的管理。目的:了解基于共识的建议的障碍和促进因素,以支持其在多专业和学科的临床实践中实施。方法:分析国际多专业重症、急诊和老年医学专家在德尔菲共识中对≥80岁icu患者管理的意见。使用理论领域框架分析障碍和促进因素。结果:完成德尔菲第一轮的124名参与者中,有99名(79.8%)提供了护理陈述评论;主要识别障碍(239/258;92.6%)。大多数参与者确定了医疗保健系统内环境背景和资源的局限性(152,63.6%);主要是资源/物质资源的限制,人员(60,25.1%)和床位或设施(30,12.6%)的问题。潜在可修改的领域集中在知识不足(25.10.5%)、对后果的信念(18.7.5%)、护理目标(16.6.7%)和社会/职业角色和身份(16.6.7%)。辅导员注重提高员工的知识,特别是老年医学和重症监护医学专业的知识,以及环境背景和资源(均为8.42.1%)。结论:环境背景和资源领域是最常见的障碍。行为改变的机会集中在领域的知识,对后果的信念,目标和社会/职业角色和身份。可以根据当地卫生保健情况确定和开发相关的行为改变技术,以支持实施护理建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信